AZhitman wrote:Thanks, Captain Obvious. We're all much more enlightened now.
Is that why Nico goes down around 1am EST?AZhitman wrote:We've already completed Stage I of our big upgrades (migrating all static content to WP), and are implementing gzip on both the forum templates and the static stuff (as well as the ad server) just like you suggested...
AZhitman wrote:We've already completed Stage I of our big upgrades (migrating all static content to WP), and are implementing gzip on both the forum templates and the static stuff (as well as the ad server) just like you suggested...
Cause and effect: You're doing it wrong.PoorManQ45 wrote:Is that why Nico goes down around 1am EST?
You didn't establish the cause...AZhitman wrote:
Cause and effect: You're doing it wrong.
np man i have a few php monkeys ready to unleash (under supervision, of course) heh.AZhitman wrote:Some of that will be addressed with this phase of improvements, but getting it where I think it needs to be will take a little longer, after the actual forum and archive transitions.
TG, I may take you up on your offer to some extent... We're just plain slammed with work.
Anyways, no the site goes down at 1am for regular maintenance, backups and purging and rebuilding indices likely.PoorManQ45 wrote:
Is that why Nico goes down around 1am EST?
Hehe, I have a faster server in my house then that... Dell R410...tg wrote:SO anyways, you have my email greg. I also have a qc xeon with 8gb of ram and a few TB of space on a very very fast backbone doing nothing. I could hook you up for the cost of bandwidth (we pay 4$/mbps). I really hope you guys aren't paying anywhere near the pricing I saw on pair.com :\ wow.
Why isn't this done on the fly?tg wrote:Anyways, no the site goes down at 1am for regular maintenance, backups and purging and rebuilding indices likely.
cool so nicoclub gets two servers. thats nice of you.PoorManQ45 wrote:
Hehe, I have a faster server in my house then that... Dell R410...
Why isn't this done on the fly?
Backups should not be pulled from the live server(s). They should be done from a mirrored system.
Why would you need to rebuild anything?
Why did I not predict that our resident know-it-all would come in here and tell us all how he could do it faster, easier, and better?PoorManQ45 wrote:
Hehe, I have a faster server in my house then that... Dell R410...
Why isn't this done on the fly?
Backups should not be pulled from the live server(s). They should be done from a mirrored system.
Why would you need to rebuild anything?
That does happen when you get oldAZhitman wrote:
Why did I not predict that our resident know-it-all would come in here and tell us all how he could do it faster, easier, and better?
I must be slipping ni my old age.
It kind of sucks not having paper credentialsAZhitman wrote:Brien, if you were 1/10th as smart as you think you are, you'd be getting paid a lot of money for your expertise.
Nope, I commend you and the others for the work that you have put in to make, and keep, Nico free for all!AZhitman wrote:You should probably go start a forum. I hear it's fun, interesting, and stress-free.
funny how the only jobs that aren't being taken over by illegal immigrants are the ones that require papers... makes me sort of happy that i didn't study in construction.PoorManQ45 wrote:
It kind of sucks not having paper credentials
Nope, I commend you and the others for the work that you have put in to make, and keep, Nico free for all!
tg wrote:
Ask any sysadmin, any real sysadmin. It doesn't matter if you have 4 cores or 40; throughput is throughput.
hehe, I am waiting for STEC SSDs to become more realistically priced. Talk about throughput and I/O!!!tg wrote:Ask any sysadmin, any real sysadmin. It doesn't matter if you have 4 cores or 40; throughput is throughput.
What type of systems are you rocking? I can always get new toys just because...tg wrote:Anyways, the server I offered was a SPARE I had lying around, rest assured we have some 4U monsters that would put your R410 to shame ;D
let me know when your db server is doing 140,000 iops ok. Anyways, azhitman you know where to find me. I'll leave it at that.PoorManQ45 wrote:
hehe, I am waiting for STEC SSDs to become more realistically priced. Talk about throughput and I/O!!!
What type of systems are you rocking? I can always get new toys just because...
SSDs FTW. I love mine in my PCs, but I don't even want to price them out on the server side. Thankfully, that's not an issue for me.PoorManQ45 wrote:STEC SSDs
Check out STEC once. You might be a little shocked. A single STEC Zeus is good for Read: up to 80,000, Write:40,000!!! That is effing sexytg wrote:
let me know when your db server is doing 140,000 iops ok. Anyways, azhitman you know where to find me. I'll leave it at that.
I had a pair of Samsung 256GB SSDs in my laptop. They were set up in a Raid 0. Initially the average read speed was 440MBps! But after ~6 months of heavy use the average read dropped to ~150MBps!!! I sold them and went to a pair of 500GB 7200s in a raid 0. Not as fast, but pretty quick.AppleBonker wrote:
SSDs FTW. I love mine in my PCs, but I don't even want to price them out on the server side. Thankfully, that's not an issue for me.
Too bad TRIM isn't supported across raid. My windows drive on my desktop is a pair of OCZ 30 GB drives raid 0, but I don't use windows much. My Ubuntu drive is a single 30 OCZ. When I get around to buying windows 7 I'll probably pick up a 160 gig Intel G2 and move one of the OCZs to my netbook (and the other to my HTPC) and take the 80 GB Intel G2 out of my netbook and use as my windows drive on my desktop. Unfortunately the 160 GB Intel is too pricey for me right now.PoorManQ45 wrote:But after ~6 months of heavy use the average read dropped to ~150MBps!!!
8 ocz vertex raid 0 in my home pc. Been running this setup since last spring, no slowdowns. Thanks for coming out though.PoorManQ45 wrote:
Check out STEC once. You might be a little shocked. A single STEC Zeus is good for Read: up to 80,000, Write:40,000!!! That is effing sexy
I had a pair of Samsung 256GB SSDs in my laptop. They were set up in a Raid 0. Initially the average read speed was 440MBps! But after ~6 months of heavy use the average read dropped to ~150MBps!!! I sold them and went to a pair of 500GB 7200s in a raid 0. Not as fast, but pretty quick.
tg wrote:
trust me you're not the one putting the logs on the rail.AppleBonker wrote:
Well, I guess my e-peen is tiny. Sorry for derailing your thread tg. I'm out! I apparently can't compete.
RamDrive > SSDstg wrote:
8 ocz vertex raid 0 in my home pc. Been running this setup since last spring, no slowdowns. Thanks for coming out though.
Really? How did he end up in that position? Did he found that datacenter?AZhitman wrote:BTW, our SysAdmin makes $120K and doesn't have a credential to his name.
this is not ramdrive, this is my ssd array.PoorManQ45 wrote:
RamDrive > SSDs
I never got around to setting it up on my laptop. I've got 16GB of DDR3
I expect to see it!AZhitman wrote:Thanks for coming out (I'm gonna keep using that one... )
What Raid controller are you using, and what bus is it one?tg wrote:
this is not ramdrive, this is my ssd array.
You and I both, LOL.Rex wrote:My 2 favs are
su - rootandsetpri
Of course, I have no idea what I'm talking about