Return of the Hachi Roku?

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

the us govt can take a lot of blame for overweight cars (think safety). the rest of that blame can go to spoiled americans that "need" their creature comforts. the enthusiasts who don't want airbags, stereos, power locks/windows, etc. are in the minority so it won't make sense to produce enough bare minimum cars to keep them satisfied (as iff the govt would allow less safety equipment anyways). in the end, if the enthusiasts want the car bad enough to overlook the extra unnecessary equipment, they'll buy the car anyways. in which case, the auto manufacturer doesn't care anymore because they already have your money.


User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

PEZi720 wrote:from what i've heard... could be wrong... but its a government regulation that they weigh more now so that they are 'safer'
Never heard of that, but sounds believable enough from Uncle Sam. Kinda contradictory of the whole "green" movement though, as more hp is needed to slop the pigs around.

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

numbnuts240 wrote: the enthusiasts who don't want airbags, stereos, power locks/windows, etc. are in the minority so it won't make sense to produce enough bare minimum cars to keep them satisfied (as iff the govt would allow less safety equipment anyways).
the problem i have with this is that technically this car is aimed towards enthusiasts... so minimal stuff should be applied... but yeah no way getting around the gov't safety BS

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

All this talk of a minimalist approach to this car is nice and all... but we all know it's not gonna happen. The common shopper wouldn't look twice at something that stripped down and Toyota would lose money.

Wait, maybe... if they sold it as just that: A limited production, stripped down model just like the Evo RS. Maybe then it might fly, but certainly not as the mainstream model....

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

i woulda took the EVO RS assuming i coulda afforded it... oh well

User avatar
ScrapMetal
Posts: 3420
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:19 am
Car: 1999 Chevrolet S10
1991 Ford Bronco 5.0
Location: Sugarcandy Mountain
Contact:

Post

hachiroku781 wrote:Tito how dare you diss toyota. Puerto ricans can not hate toyota.
I thought Puerto Ricans were partial towards Mazdas. I've even heard you guys even have a Mazda museum down there. I've also heard you guys stick rotary engines in everything, from old school Toyo pick ups and Corollas to Datsun dimes.
flohtingPoint wrote:They want to release a real next-gen 86, give me the following:-A technologically stupid car (no fancy lights, only analog gauges, etc)-plain-Jane interior-3SGE motor-No more than 2500 lbs curb weight-option for crank windows-No bigger than 15 inch wheels stock-no plastic motor garnish anywhere under the bonnet

I can keep going but it's a moot point. This idea by Toyota is misguided.
That is so unrealistic not only for a $20K car, but for any car nowadays. This is a modern version of the AE86 as in it is a front engine RWD compact(by today's standard) coupe. It is not meant to be an exact replica of the original AE86 by how you describe it should be aside from the 3SGE. Is the new 370Z an exact replica of the original 240Z? No way in hell, but it still embodies that same "spirit" of the original.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

simmode1 wrote:All this talk of a minimalist approach to this car is nice and all... but we all know it's not gonna happen. The common shopper wouldn't look twice at something that stripped down and Toyota would lose money.

Wait, maybe... if they sold it as just that: A limited production, stripped down model just like the Evo RS. Maybe then it might fly, but certainly not as the mainstream model....
if you make it cheap and visually appealing, it'll get gobbled up for having the sombrero on the grill.

the problem with the REALLY cheap cars on the market right now is that they're all 4 doors and godawful ugly with no balls to them.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

ScrapMetal wrote:
I thought Puerto Ricans were partial towards Mazdas. I've even heard you guys even have a Mazda museum down there. I've also heard you guys stick rotary engines in everything, from old school Toyo pick ups and Corollas to Datsun dimes.
nowadays that is very true. there are rotaries everywhere on the island. for a while, though, the fastest drag cars were dimes with nasty ka24e's. i can't even find any youtube videos anymore amongst all the rotaries,


Return to “General Chat”