Excellent analysis of the situation.Kohster wrote:He spoke out on this incident because he is a personal friend of his. I'm glad he called the cop stupid, it made me lol.
What is equally as bad if not worse is how BHO was discussing a history of profiling, etc. This was not a police stop, this was not profiling. The neighbor called the police after seeing two men attempting to break in. Gates should be thanking the neighbor and the police, not causing a fuss and acting a fool.AZhitman wrote:So, friends of the Prez get preferential treatment?He's stupid. For sticking his nose into something that's none of his business, and not understanding that protocol was followed.
Where does it say that? It says his comment was bla bla bla. We don't know weather he was asked about it or weather he brought the thing up.heliochrome85 wrote: The president was asked a question.
http://www.politico.com/news/s....htmldusred wrote:
Where does it say that? It says his comment was bla bla bla. We don't know weather he was asked about it or weather he brought the thing up.
i would say something, but your words are telling enough. congrats on being the top of your class.dusred wrote:lmfao!
Are you kidding!? The only thing Mr. Prez said anything is probably because Gates was a friend from Harvard. . . a black friend at that. Harvard men stick together, just in case you didn't know.
Easy there, Prince Abooboo.heliochrome85 wrote:he shows them his Harvard ID, and Drivers License to prove he lives there
reading, its your friend. its not just for the educated liberals.
C-Kwik wrote:I might note that NOONE here knows exactly what happened that night. While I do think its not something Obama should have commented on, we are not any different in offering rather opinionated judgements of him when we also do not know the full story. Perhaps it is we, who should be redirecting focus on the "bigger issues" rather than dwelling on such a minor incident. Or perhaps its convenient to be so critical of one who we want to see fail...
http://andrewsullivan.theatlan....htmlThe Atlantic Online wrote:
Is This the Instance of Police Misconduct to Obsess About?
by Conor Friedersdorf
Interesting as it is to speculate about Henry Louis Gates and the Cambridge Police Department, the attention the case is generating reflects an unfortunate feature of American public discourse: you've got someone like Radley Balko who spends the bulk of his career documenting the most grave instances of police misconduct imaginable -- including cases that involve the incarceration of innocent people for years on end -- and most of even the egregious cases he writes about never break into mainstream conversation, whereas a minor altercation involving a Harvard professor who isn't even being charged with a crime spawns wall-to-wall media coverage.
Isn't it notable that six months into his presidency, the most prominent advocacy President Obama has done on behalf of minorities mistreated by police is to stand up for his Ivy League buddy? Somehow I imagine that Professor Gates would've fared just fine absent help from Harvard's most prominent alumnus.
Whereas if President Obama spoke up at a press conference on behalf of people wrongly imprisoned due to "testimony" by police dogs, or advocated for those sexually assaulted by an officer, or spoke against prosecutors who block access to DNA testing, or called out the officer who choked a paramedic, or objected to the practice of police killing family pets, or asked the Innocence Project for a clear cut case of injustice to publicize...
I understand, of course, that Pres. Obama was asked about Henry Louis Gates, which is also part of the problem. Wrongly arrest a black men who happens to be a Harvard professor, release him without filing charges, and the national press corps asks the president to comment. Wrongly imprison for years on end a black man who happens to be working class and without celebrity, and the national press corps continues to utterly ignore a criminal justice system that routinely convicts innocent people. Apportioning blame for this sorry state of affairs isn't as important as recognizing that the news we get on these matters reflects a value system that is seriously flawed, and that news consumers bear blame for too.
Methinks that he needs to actually focus on ONE issue, instead of all problems at once. The first problem being a new bill tat disallows any bill that is over 300 pages long to be passed. Of course this bill would probably end up being 311 pages long so....AZhitman wrote:Methinks our Commander-in-Chief needs to focus on bigger issues and keep his yap shut when he doesn't know what he's talking about
Its nice to see that the Oval Office can exert some pressure on the might of the Cambridge PD, we've all seen how he stood up to Iran and North Korea.Kohster wrote:I really give obama credit for having the testicular fortitude to state his opinion on this matter.
LOL. I'm a firm believer that you shouldn't write a check w/ your mouth unless you're prepared to pay for it, and since the 1st amendment doesn't protect you from the repercussions of your speech.WDRacing wrote:I think the cop should have tazered the professor prior to the arrest.
But he didn't. But the reality is, it is of no consequence by itself (unless he's actually making policy out of it). The Prez is only human afterall. Unless you actually believe he is the "Messiah."AZhitman wrote:Oh, and Chano - I'd like nothing more than for our Prez to succeed, as we're sorely in need of some good leadership.
I could give a damn about the larger issue, because this small incident is simply a building block OF that larger issue. I'm sure both parties could have done things differently, but my beef is with the Prez putting himself in a precarious position. He SHOULD have said, "I don't really know enough about the situation to comment."