dkill:
I never had a chance to notice a reduction in top end since I have yet to take this car to 160-170mph, but if you look at the revs you will see that no reduction in top end is expected to occur.
As for the 4.08 I currently cant tell how much it adds as my car is currently hampered by a wrong JWT ecu that limits my rpm to 6500 instead of 7300 ( JWT).
Lopping off 10% of your upper revs on a multivalve VVT engine means you lose a lot of extra power and sometimes induce a extra shift.
I havent had the time to fix it in the 11 months I owned this car as I would need JWT cooperation.
You you hear so many horror stories of folks getting the run around just wanting to buy a part and give them money I can just imagine what would happen with the solution needed for this.
We have a member aaacomp, who does Q45 chips as well and most that have dealt with him were very satisfied ( there was one exception) .
So I cant take full advantage of the 4.08 with ym lower redline.
But I can say that my milage seems unaffected maybe because it helps keep the engine nearer its efficiency bad for the sporty driving I tend to do?Also, it allows me to keep the stick in "D" rather than my previously habitual "3" for in town driving.
I say drivability has improved as a result of the shorter diff, but I cant make any tru performance comparisons as my numbers have been disapointing, which i suspect is due to my reredline problem.
A consensus exists, that a quality chip like JWT is very worthwhile and most (but not all) feel the 4.08 is worthwhile as well.
Fred...
