Post by
maxnix »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/maxnix-u127.html
Fri Apr 02, 2004 8:15 pm
No, you are correct, but there is some dissension on heat transfer from an iron disc through an aluminum hat to the hub carrier. Heat transfer from the pistons to the caliper is probably negligible due to the pistons being floating. I would think much more heat is transferred to the brake fluid since there is direct thermal coupling. So alloy calipers are mainly lighter and (hopefully) stiffer in that they have less flex.
Lighter calipers would be an aid to heavier rotors (in mitigating the increase in unsprung mass), which is what a brake that will resist heat defomation needs; increased thermal inertia due to increased mass. However, in a one time stop, increased rotational mass is the enemy.
Hence, swept area is key, given the same pad formulation. A greater swept area will allow finer control and more clamping area to spread the friction and heat on the rotor. Remember the old R&T summary pages on the road test summary page with the swept area/ton?
Finally, if you can lock the brakes or trigger the ABS now, the tires are the limiting factor, and no increse in brake size or diameter is going to shorten that first stop. However, rotor life in specification and many repeated decelerations (pursuit or sport driving) performance will increase with larger, heavier rotors and more pistons in a stiffer, lighter caliper, given the same brake pad formulation and thickness and fluid.
Other issues, such as deeping the hydraulic assist ratio between the front and rear breaks constant are ignored for the moment.