Premium fuel

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
lamuncha
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:41 pm

Post

I'm trying to get a an explanation regarding premium fuel in the V6 engine.
My Xterra is 4.0 L, 9.7 ratio, 261 HP, 281 lb-ft T
Pathfinder: 4.0 L, 9.7 ratio, 266 HP, 288 lb-ft T

The owners manual on the Xterra says regular
The owners manual on the Pathfinder says premium.

Essentially the same engine.
Anyone shed any light on this?

Thanks


User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

oh boy, you're opening Pandora's box here!

User avatar
troskinatior
Posts: 1228
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:26 pm
Car: A Two Tone Piggy Coupe
Location: Jersey Shore Bish

Post

go regular, there was a artical about this awile ago

User avatar
corn322
Posts: 1572
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 10:11 am
Car: 1993 240sx
Location: Austin, TX

Post

Perhaps the Pathfinder has a more aggressive ECU tune?

lamuncha
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:41 pm

Post

I guess, but with similar HP and Torque if they advanced it they sure didn't squeeze much more out to justify premium.

User avatar
VMPhil
Posts: 1585
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:06 pm
Car: 2007 Volkswagen GTI
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Post

from everything I have read Premium is only useful on forced induction engines.

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

Here is an article with some generalities about octanes.

http://www.nicoclub.com/archives/gasoli ... myths.html

I'll do some more research to see if I can find any specifics about the Pathfinder.

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

^ that article is good for generalities

if your manual recommends premium, there is usually a reason... timing could be that reason although i agree i'd like to see bigger numbers if they advanced enough to call for premium

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Perhaps they used the greater octane for better fuel economy as opposed to HP numbers. Maybe help lessen the "sticker shock"? :gotme

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

lamuncha wrote:I'm trying to get a an explanation regarding premium fuel in the V6 engine.
My Xterra is 4.0 L, 9.7 ratio, 261 HP, 281 lb-ft T
Pathfinder: 4.0 L, 9.7 ratio, 266 HP, 288 lb-ft T

The owners manual on the Xterra says regular
The owners manual on the Pathfinder says premium.

Essentially the same engine.
Anyone shed any light on this?

Thanks
Do you own both? If so, which fuel are you using?

User avatar
s0m3th1ngAZ
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:11 am
Car: 96' Miata
2014 Focus ST

Post

I was told boost and a compression ratio above 10.5 requires premium...fact or fiction?

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

premium for anything running boost / supercharged; not sure about specific compression ratios

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

ScorchedNX2K wrote:I was told boost and a compression ratio above 10.5 requires premium...fact or fiction?
depends... mostly yes... 10.5 is a good number to use premium for sure

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

ScorchedNX2K wrote:I was told boost and a compression ratio above 10.5 requires premium...fact or fiction?
There are a LOT more factors that go into it than that. There are lots of designs/materials that dissipate heat better, prevent hot spots, etc. Saying "10.5" isn't a very good method. Hell, stock 240s have 9.5:1 compression, and require premium.

Aluminum blocks/heads dissipate heat better, so you can usually run higher compression there without the need for premium (or still run premium, and run even HIGHER compression :woot: )

Oil squirters, cooling design, altitude, ambient temperature, atomization efficiency & injection cycle (look at what direct injection can achieve) all play factors.

Really, it goes back to this:
PEZi720 wrote: if your manual recommends premium, there is usually a reason...
Can you run regular? In most cases, yes. Performance and fuel economy will suffer, and you could potentially damage some components/longevity if you hot dog the s*** out of it for extended periods of time on regular fuel.

User avatar
s0m3th1ngAZ
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:11 am
Car: 96' Miata
2014 Focus ST

Post

PapaSmurf2k3 wrote: Hell, stock 240s have 9.5:1 compression, and require premium.
What? No they dont...Texaco Regular for two years and didn't ping.

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

ScorchedNX2K wrote: What? No they dont...Texaco Regular for two years and didn't ping.
pinging isn't the only issue to be had by not running the recommended fuel as stated above

whether or not the manual says premium for the 240... dunno.. never looked at one

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

Why put up with reduced horsepower? For a couple bucks a tank its worth it if your owners manual asks for it.

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

Jesda wrote:Why put up with reduced horsepower? For a couple bucks a tank its worth it if your owners manual asks for it.
This

User avatar
BusyBadger
Posts: 3753
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 3:20 pm
Car: '92 Nissan 240SX
'05 Nissan 350Z
'13 Nissan Juke
Contact:

Post

^ ^ Beat me to it.
ScorchedNX2K wrote:
PapaSmurf2k3 wrote: Hell, stock 240s have 9.5:1 compression, and require premium.
What? No they dont...Texaco Regular for two years and didn't ping.
No they don't...what? Have a 9.5:1 compression ratio or require premium?
PEZi720 wrote:whether or not the manual says premium for the 240... dunno.. never looked at one
I know the inside gas flap says premium. That being said, I've run 87 in mine for years and never had a problem and it's got just a bit over 300K on the clock on the stock mill.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

anything with a higher compression be it naturally aspirated or not will need a higher octane gas to keep it a little more stable under the compression stroke.

pre detonation is a bad bad thing.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Mr1der wrote:anything with a higher compression be it naturally aspirated or not will need a higher octane gas to keep it a little more stable under the compression stroke.

pre detonation is a bad bad thing.
Direct Injection is a hell of a drug.
Image

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

:rotfl

Welp, I went turbo so premium/no premium isn't a debate anymore.
Me no want boom.

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

What's the deal with a 240 being recommended premium? I NEVER put anything but regular in mine except for once during a track day. It ran no different at all. And I'm 90% sure the KA engine was never recommended premium.

Dunno about the Pathfinder/Xterra thing though. I would go to the dealer and ask one of the techs.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

AZ89two4Tsx wrote: And I'm 90% sure the KA engine was never recommended premium.
.
You'd be 90% wrong
READ YOUR MANUALS PEOPLE!!!
http://www.edmunds.com/nissan/240sx/
"From a practical standpoint, the car was hampered by a borderline-useless backseat and trunk and a need for premium fuel."

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

BusyBadger wrote: I know the inside gas flap says premium. That being said, I've run 87 in mine for years and never had a problem and it's got just a bit over 300K on the clock on the stock mill.
AZ89two4Tsx wrote: And I'm 90% sure the KA engine was never recommended premium.
something tells me one of these people knows more than the other.... jus' sayin'
AZ89two4Tsx wrote: I NEVER put anything but regular in mine except for once during a track day. It ran no different at all.
this is typical... it doesn't run better right away regardless because it takes your ECU time to realize the premium is in there

people running race gas at the track will sometimes notice that it does nothing while they're there because it hasn't adjusted to the high octane... but on the way home they might notice some extra pep.... ECU's are worthless! :couch:

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Just sack up and twist your dizzy after putting premium or race fuel in there. You'll notice that pretty quickly.

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:Just sack up and twist your dizzy after putting premium or race fuel in there. You'll notice that pretty quickly.
mine is fully twisted all the time.... :ohno:

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

PEZi720 wrote:
BusyBadger wrote: I know the inside gas flap says premium. That being said, I've run 87 in mine for years and never had a problem and it's got just a bit over 300K on the clock on the stock mill.
AZ89two4Tsx wrote: And I'm 90% sure the KA engine was never recommended premium.
something tells me one of these people knows more than the other.... jus' sayin'
Mine always said "unleaded fuel only." On the inside of the gas door and and on the cluster. I assumed that meant 87.

That being said, I had a single cam. Dunno if that makes a difference.

User avatar
PEZi
Posts: 20441
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:21 am
Car: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX Mitsubishi Racing Edition
Location: Pikes Peak, CO
Contact:

Post

AZ89two4Tsx wrote:
That being said, I had a single cam. Dunno if that makes a difference.
good question....

lamuncha
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:41 pm

Post

Thanks PEZi720 - probably the most likely reason. Bumped the timing up a bit to get a few more HP.

BTW those thinking octane is related to fuel economy or performance or that the engine is smart enough to know what's burning are (in low compression machines) mistaken.
The higher octane fuel is refined a bit further in the chain and different additives are use to prevent detonation.


Return to “General Chat”