UpStar wrote:....and I could give a fcuk less what you think.
UpStar wrote:Again... I could give a fcuk less what you think!
You must be fresh out of fcuks by now.
If you don't like what I post, then don't respond to me, Tantrum-Boy.
BTW, I'll let you know when you "slap me across the head" with one of your posts. It hasn't happened yet, but I'm sure you'll have your hand down the front of your Depends tonight, dreaming of how cool it would be.
UpStar wrote:Back on topic:
Palin has taken another step out of bounds. She called out the repubs and made it clear that they should get onboard with the tea baggers
How is that "out of bounds"?
Maybe "out of bounds" for someone who believes that our speech should be censured, but what's wrong with someone speaking their mind?
And, specifically, what's wrong with what she said? Since you always have such a hardon for Ms. Palin, let's hear your brilliant critique of her statement.
No chickening out, either. We're "ON TOPIC", Pops. You have the spotlight - Amaze me.
Let me help - I don't want you to injure yourself: Yes, the GOP does need to seriously consider the groundswell in the country towards those candidates who support smaller government, increased accountability, and are pro-business, pro-civil liberties and oppose mislabeled, so-called "progressive" policies.
Maybe YOU should learn a little more about where we're headed, rather than ignorantly repeating demeaning little names ("tea baggers") that you heard from some snot-nosed lefty pseudo-journalist, and taking empty pot-shots at something without backing it up.
The only thing more pathetic than someone who doesn't know what they stand for is someone who opposes things but can't explain why.