Fact 1.eomund wrote:You people are fun.
Fact 2: You don't know how to drive.
Out of curiosity, how many of you missed this? We were coming up to a stop and I breaked a little early on purpouse. Oh, and I wasn't 'Hanging in the left lane'. I was actually speeding.eomund wrote:Well, the streach turns to 55 because of an up coming stop light.
Not 'destroyed' I don't think. Looked pretty minor actually. Might've hurt the 3" fart can thoughKatapl wrote:Destroyed a riced out Civic?
Hey man, nice shot.
A+
Refer to this:eomund wrote:...and I wasn't 'Hanging in the left lane'. I was actually speeding.
It doesn't matter that you were speeding. You are supposed to move over and let traffic pass, regardless of the situation. What's the point of forcing the Civic behind you? What does that prove?AZhitman wrote:California Vehicle Code
21654. (a) Notwithstanding the prima facie speed limits, any vehicle proceeding upon a highway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at such time shall be driven in the right-hand lane for traffic or as close as practicable to the right-hand edge or curb, except when overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction
It proves how TUFF he is.DevilMB3017 wrote:It doesn't matter that you were speeding. You are supposed to move over and let traffic pass, regardless of the situation. What's the point of forcing the Civic behind you? What does that prove?
Again, I had a LEFT turn coming up within the next few lights.DevilMB3017 wrote:
Refer to this:
It doesn't matter that you were speeding. You are supposed to move over and let traffic pass, regardless of the situation. What's the point of forcing the Civic behind you? What does that prove?
I dunno about you but a FEW lights around here is like two blocks. And which way were you turning again?eomund wrote:Again, I had a LEFT turn coming up within the next few lights.
marlin29311 wrote:+1 for riced out civic.
-2 for breaking the law and causing an accident.
I'm actually normally a courteous driver 90% of the time. If the Honda'd not have come up behind me and not gotten about 6 inches off my tail, 99% chance I would've gotten over for him. I save my aggressive driving tactics for people who'd rather do something like tail gate then be patient.Marenta wrote:Odd thing is, I bet that if he had gotten into the right lane to pass, you probably would've moved over with him just so he couldn't pass you. I mean, that's what normally aggressive drivers do, right?
That's what your OP should have said dude...eomund wrote:I love fresh flowers and walks with my "life partner". He also enjoys flowers too, but not the kind I like. I prefer pansies...
If that isn't how you destroy a Civic, then I don't know what is.eomund wrote:Not 'destroyed' I don't think. Looked pretty minor actually. Might've hurt the 3" fart can though
i think we just found his life partner.Katapl wrote:
If that isn't how you destroy a Civic, then I don't know what is.
loool
"Tactics"? You're trained?eomund wrote:I save my aggressive driving tactics for people who'd rather do something like tail gate then be patient.
Ummmmmmmmmm..... But here in cali even if your in the slow lane and doing 65 people still come up your Azz and tailgate and honk at you... I have brake checked many people over the years for coming up behind me and honking at me for going 65mph in a 65mph being the maximum speed. I have had a cop ride Q45s *** for 5-6 miles while i was doing 65 in the slow lane and when i moved one lane over to the left to let him go, he didn't go but backed off a bit so i go back to the slow lane again doing 65 and he pulled me over and his reason was that i made an unnecessary lane change without signaling properly... I mean wtffff i let my signals blink five times before i made both lane changes. It was a $150 ticket which i lost the case in court. Some people deserve being brake checked but making them crash i mean is a bit too much, and in this case the civic driver was an idiot for slamming on his brakes since he knew he had it coming for tailgating for that long and was ready to slam on them...AZhitman wrote:
Again I ask - Would you have behaved like this if there was a black Crown Vic in your rear view?
Encryptshun wrote:For those of you too lazy to read, in short:
You are a douchebagYou are lucky no one got your plate for causing an accident and then fleeing the sceneIf you are in the fast lane and someone comes up behind you, you PULL OVER INTO THE OTHER LANE AND LET THEM PASSIt's not your job to enforce traffic laws with your c*ck
Dude. Your kidding right?eomund wrote:Now let me point out the slow lane is pretty much open and he can pass me on the right any time he wants.
psmith wrote:I'm with Encryptshun on this one... 75 is NOT fast and if the slow lane was open that's where you should have been. Not forcing other drivers to pass you on the right...
fixedADDirishboy wrote:I love being an absolute d!ck to people. And FYI for everyone, you can't get in trouble for doing that (unless you SLAM on the brakes.) The person behind you is responsible for not being to close to you.
Yea, I do like being a d!ck to people like that. Now I would feel bad if I caused an accident, but if not then they usually deserve it.SCCoupe wrote:
fixed
I stopped reading right there. You are what is wrong with this country. GTFO Commie.eomund wrote:
Well, when I get a tailgater, my policy is to slow down.