It's also referred to as Paleoconservatism. Here's the Wikipedia article (which I haven't read, sorry - need to get some orders in for NX parts before I go to bed)WDRacing wrote:When you say traditional conservative, what do you mean exactly?
I'll read that when I get home from work todaysrellim234 wrote:WD- if it helps, here's his campaign website:
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/home/skip/?s=0618
I do have a question for you and although I know better I'll ask everyone else here not to make any kind of judgement, snide remark or argue about your answer, because it is entirely personal on your part. Answer not open for debate or criticism. In fact, I will ask the same question of everyone here who feels compelled to vote for a major candidate to prevent the other from being elected:
If, somehow it became obvious prior to the election that the candidate you were going to vote for had absolutely no chance, would you seriously look at other candidates? If you found someone more to your liking than McCain or Obama would you then change your vote to a third party?
NX parts aye...whyishkabibble wrote:
It's also referred to as Paleoconservatism. Here's the Wikipedia article (which I haven't read, sorry - need to get some orders in for NX parts before I go to bed)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoconservatism
...wasn't this discussion about 'character'?rn79870 wrote:
Really, we don't dispute that in his younger days he was a great man. The McCain of 2000 was even a better man. But the McCain of 2008 isn't a shell of what he once was. It's unfortunate, but it's true. Look in his eyes when he tries to assemble sentences other than the ones his handlers have provided for him, he's lost.
He's recently used cocaine? When??AZhitman wrote: recent cocaine use.
People can change. are you not familiar with this concept? Bush used to be an alcoholic & a coke user, but he changed.AZhitman wrote:In what universe does a person's 'character', their core being, change with age?
Basically when this happened apparentlystopcamping wrote:He's recently used cocaine? When??
That's behavior, not character. His character, as Ish said above, hasn't changed.stopcamping wrote:
People can change. are you not familiar with this concept? Bush used to be an alcoholic & a coke user, but he changed.
Nice try. When you can keep up with the majority of the posters in this thread on an intellectual level, then you can call it "spin". Just because you can't comprehend the intricacies of this discussion, doesn't make it "spin".stopcamping wrote:ok so i guess it is not recent then. hitman apparently is just a cog in the republican spin machine.
I see alot of old people driving down the road. They're real characters. Old people don't drive like younger people, and they seem to cause a lot more accidents. Sometimes, I wonder if it's safe for old people to drive.AZhitman wrote:Character: the inherent complex of attributes that determines a persons moral and ethical actions and reactions... a person's repute, a person's qualifications and dependability.
Well there you have it. You've been thinking baseball and I've been hitting 320 yard drives down the center of the fairway. I wondered why you missed my shots so often... [/QUOTE]rn79870 wrote:
I see alot of old people driving down the road. They're real characters. Old people don't drive like younger people, and they seem to cause a lot more accidents. Sometimes, I wonder if it's safe for old people to drive.
[qquote=AZHitman]*There ya go Bob, I set the ball on the tee for you - Now you swing and try to hit it past the infield.
Nah, I count many on-topic posts in this thread. Plus, it's meaningful to me - people's actions are more important than their words.smockers83 wrote:
To whom it may concern,No worries, this thread got off topic so quickly that it's essentially pointless.
Bush was a drunk and a coke user, which are characters.AZhitman wrote:
That's behavior, not character. His character, as Ish said above, hasn't changed.
I call it like I see it, AZspinman. Don't get upset just because someone noticed your spinning.AZhitman wrote:
Nice try. When you can keep up with the majority of the posters in this thread on an intellectual level, then you can call it "spin". Just because you can't comprehend the intricacies of this discussion, doesn't make it "spin".
Nice try spinman, but not so. If he hasn't done any drugs in +20 yrs, then saying his coke use is recent is disingenuous because it gives the impression that he's resumed coke. Republican ads could not say his coke use was recent because then they'd be sued for slander, as they should be.AZhitman wrote:Besides, at 45 years old, EVERYTHING is "recent".
OK, spinman. We'll be watching.AZhitman wrote:I'll lump BO in the "coke user" and "terrorlst sympathizer" category.
I'm not sure we were watching the same video. Perhaps your computer took you to a different site or something.rn79870 wrote:the linked McCain video was a textbook example of dementia, complete with classic confusion and slurred speech. Honestly, he may have even soiled himself in that interview.
Yeah, that darn DOJ... always handling libby business.AZhitman wrote:Another typical libbyism - Run and find a lawyer to handle your business.