Actually, the guides usually break piece by piece, putting plastic in the oil pan and putting pieces in the way of the chain. Thats how many higher-mileage 90-93 Qs kick the bucket.SATAN wrote:
You are telling me that out of the 160,000+ miles this car has on it and chain hasn't jumped yet, that the next few cranks it "is hugely against" me? I'm sorry but that statistically impossible. That is like million+ to one odds FOR me.
Nice, yeah, I just took some pictures through that hole and saw a metal backed timing guide and got excited. Only to find out, that one came metal backed anyways. It is the tension guide. That is probably what I am going to do, just pull the front apart and go from there.Q451990 wrote:I suspect all of the diagnostic work on your engine was a result of guide failure already. Best case, pull the front cover (you can't see anything from that inspection hole), retime if necessary, and then check compresson for bent valves. Worst case, just check compression... It's up to you - just let us know what you find.
Heath
Your reading comprehension seems to be lacking. I HIGHLY suggest you go read my posts again.Haitian_King wrote:No need to get testy.
I take it that you're new to Q45's and the VH45DE engine. This engine is well-designed and quite bulletproff. However, the plastic chain guides are this magnificent machine's kryptonite.
These guys are pretty well-versed in Q45-ery. (Totally made that word up).
It doesn't pay to be the hot-shot maverick who doesn't listen and does his own thing. Top Gun wasn't real.
No one is looking to make you do anythnig extra or detrimental to your Q. In fact, they want to help you help yourself get your Q running the way it should.
But whatever floats your boat. Water floats mine.
My comprehension skills are quite high. In fact, from the highlighted sentence, I can comprehend that you're disagreeing with the statement "The odds are against you." That was a response to your statement thatSATAN wrote:No they are not. People, stop replying to my posts if you refuse to read them.
Uhh. Pretty sure that was the gist of it.SATAN wrote:You are telling me that out of the 160,000+ miles this car has on it and chain hasn't jumped yet, that the next few cranks it "is hugely against" me? I'm sorry but that statistically impossible. That is like million+ to one odds FOR me. .
Ok, jackass, You done went and made me quote myself, Thanks. Now read the whole ****ing thing and then tell me what I said one more time?SATAN wrote:
You are telling me that out of the 160,000+ miles this car has on it and chain hasn't jumped yet, that the next few cranks it "is hugely against" me? I'm sorry but that statistically impossible. That is like million+ to one odds FOR me.
Perhaps you didnt read my whole post, I AM HEEDING the advice and inspecting the chains before I do anymore cranking though. I will probably get to it this weekend. By the time I get home on the week nights it is too dark to do anything. That and one of my other cars just got totaled out by some other person, so I have been dealing with that this week too.
I do appreciate the advice of the board members. Thank you for replying.
This is absolutely painful to read-have you no shame? Where do you derive your self image-please God, let it not be a car!!maxnix wrote:Dennis' prose is kind of a cryptic post-apocalytic crisis engineering style.
It's like reading Chaucer in the original. After a while, your mind accomodates and completes and corrects the narrative and declarative sentence structure. The facts are all there for those who want them.