No, that is a real bad idea! The covers leak because the RTV or rubber has lost its elasticity so will not seal any longer.oldmako wrote:With regard to the valve covers, it's POSSIBLE that they only need to be re-torqued and the old gaskets are still capable of keeping the oil in.
And you could be fatally wrong. Chance is actually hugely against you.SATAN wrote:I am willing to put money on the fact that if the chain has not jumped already, it is not going to jump while doing a compression test. It is a game of chance. Chance is HUGELY on my side.
Quite true. The last thing any board member wants to see is another owner taking unnecessary risks. I've been reading archived posts and I've learned that these guys have been learning the hard way about Q's since the Yahoo days. They know what they're talking about. They've been there and done that. Probably why they're so fashionably jaded. To quote the Barenaked Ladies: "It's All Been Done."maxnix wrote: We are trying to help you. Why take a chance that is unnecessary?
Probaby won't see much with a mirror but you may be able to get a fiber optic scope down there.SATAN wrote:But... either way, I will get a mirror and check the guides to see if they have been replaced. IF THEY HAVE, then I will put it back together, get a new CAS from someone and see if it starts, If not, I will pull it apart and see if it has jumped teeth or if it is timed correctly. ?
Check NICO's Infiniti Parts Forum:brooklyn_in_kansas_city wrote:a i just got a 1990 Infinity q45 and i know what i need but it like no one have it in stock. Do you know of any sits that i could buy a ignition lock cylinder,a hood, hood latch, doors locks and a trunk lock.....anyone
Actually, the 11 in th plug specification refers to the 1.1 mm gap.GseaQ wrote:Make sure you check the gap in your spark plugs before you install them.
Don't bother getting the colder than stock plugs.
Good for you! It's amazing what one can learn from these earlier posts. A couple of years ago, the first thing a new member would do is sit down over the course of a month or two and read these posts. There was a lot less "Which Dubs should I get?" or "You've got mail." type of posts back then.Haitian_King wrote: I've been reading archived posts and I've learned that these guys have been learning the hard way about Q's since the Yahoo days. They know what they're talking about. They've been there and done that. Probably why they're so fashionably jaded.
maxnix wrote:No, that is a real bad idea! The covers leak because the RTV or rubber has lost its elasticity so will not seal any longer.
Over torquing an aluminum reciever is a very bad idea unless you love helicoil.
These engines are not Detroit cast pig iron!
They generally don't (aluminum is ductile and frictive), and there is so little margin in an aluminum reciever and with no elasticity in the gasket there is a danger of stripping them torquing them even at OEM specifications.oldmako wrote:Who said anything about over tightening the bolts? I merely suggested that perhaps they had come loose.
You are telling me that out of the 160,000+ miles this car has on it and chain hasn't jumped yet, that the next few cranks it "is hugely against" me? I'm sorry but that statistically impossible. That is like million+ to one odds FOR me.maxnix wrote:
And you could be fatally wrong. Chance is actually hugely against you.
But as Harry Callahan said, "Do you feel lucky, punk?"
Don't be one. Inspect the timing chain guides first, then do your compression check. We are trying to help you. Why take a chance that is unnecessary?
Actually, statistics has nothing to do with predicting an individual event, only its likely hood presuming the data collection desgn and analysis was done correctly.SATAN wrote:
You are telling me that out of the 160,000+ miles this car has on it and chain hasn't jumped yet, that the next few cranks it "is hugely against" me? I'm sorry but that statistically impossible.