Bubba1 wrote:Dave, brewing coffee yourself costs about a dime per cup, The cost of the $30 coffee pot is amortized over several hundred cups.
lol, that was someone else about the coffee pot. But I understand now that this is a wasted dime, just as a cigarette is a wasted 30 cents or so. I was just showing how the article was biased is all.
Bubba1 wrote:As far as tobacco cigarettes. they are essentially an expensive, stinky, cancer causing nicotine delivery system. There are no health benefits to them at all.
Coffee, in general, stains your teeth, makes your breath smell bad and is a caffeine delivery system. There are no health benefits from it.
Bubba1 wrote:As far as oil, each car manufacturers publishes its recommended oil change intervals. Many cars come from the factory with old fashioned dino oil, so I'm not sure what you're point is. Changing the oil more frequently than the manufacturer recommends will not do any harm, but it won't provide any measureable benefits either. That's the issue. It's your choice to spend the extra money where its not necessary..
You cannot say "it won't provide any measurable benefits" because nobody traces a single driver in his habits and how the car runs every day for years...
I have plenty of reason to believe what I do, and it's not based on some made-up idea. But apparently I'm just dumb and that's it.
Bubba1 wrote:On the topic of brand name vs store brand, the article was actually referring to groceries, not drugs. They cited a blind taste test for 21 foods where consumers could not tell the difference. But Generic drugs is a good topic too.
Oh, my bad. But when you cook for yourself, using name brand products has a huge taste difference. I also don't think that 21 nondescript "foods" is good enough to make that kind of claim.