elgarvo616 wrote:
you believe that? look at the fastest cars in the world (f1), are naturally aspirated. N/A is better in every way over forced induction (aside from price).
a well set up honda is a hard thing to beat, no matter where the race is happening.
I'm not one to tell people when they are completely wrong...ok I am...lol. In this case, you're so wrong it's comical. The fastest cars on the PLANET have huge blowers attached to them bro...that's a no brainer. I know almost EVERYTHING about FI compared to NA and I can make one blanket statement that is simply fact, take ANY NA motor and add one lb of boost over atmospheric and you'll gain power. Period dot...
.......................................................
This whole BS thread about what is faster and how much it takes to be faster is like comparing apples and oranges...you simply DON'T do it unless you want to appear to know nothing about everything.
There are some many variables involved in ANY road race that HP goes out the window. NA can be faster then a FI car that has double the available power. Then again the rolls can easily be reversed.
Racing in the simplest terms is all about time spent in the power curve and the shape of said curve. It doesn't matter whether you're comparing a VTEC 2 liter to a LSX...
Anyone that says Honda doesn't make a great motor is an idiot.
WD