O.K so I am a bit confused on the MAF part? Would you be using a ABACO tunable MAF for corvettes, and Roush Mustangs setups?D-UNIT wrote:
I have a JimWolf stage 4 turbo ecu for my turbo set-up. Tuned for 740cc Tomei injectors and a 93 ford cobra MAF. Jwt said I could only use the stock oem ford maf - $325. I know jwt tunes conservative so I wanted an safc too - $180???= $505 or so. Then I found this fully tunable 100% digital MAf. I had two choices 85mm or 97mm ( can flow over 1000+ whp) The V8 shop guys said get the bigger one cuz its digital and only $10 more. = $395 maf and tunability.
SInce Jwt doesn't use endorse anything but stock mafs (probably 4 legal reasons) I decided to run my set up N/A so if something was wrong I wouldn't blow my engine. So I loaded the 93 ford program and fired her up. OMG ran like a champ. Took it on the street INSANE I never felt a KA like that. It could burnout in first then let off , catch , stomp it again and start burning out again all the way to redline , turbo style it was crazy (15in w/ ss595s). Pls the high end opened up big time. I was revving to 7200rpm and it felt like it was pulling hard all the way. I thought the turbo ecu would be pulling timing and acting up but no it was great. Must dyno NOW! It felt like 175- 180+whp. I raced a KA-T w/a T25 @ 7psi. I smoked him 1-2-3 over six car lenghts. He said his car bogged (famous one) and he let off So I said lets go again he said "nah" and looked all dejected.
Disclaimer!! The above statements were done w/ an LC-1 wideband , that for some reason loves to uncalibate itself. I highly recommend getting a WB and using the analog output emulator to feed o2 signal to your ECU. Awesome feeling. My dyno runs were without WB. it kept acting up so I unplugged it and used the stock one (bad move). Tried to adjust maf to compensate but I didn't know what the hell I was doing and made it worst. stupid LC-1.
Anyway my first pull was off the shops WB gauge - below 8.0:1afrs but I still managed a 151whp and 154ft-lbs. I tried maf tuning again but it got worse (wasted run). My final run was at 9.5:1 afrs and hit 154whp and 158 ft-lbs. I was impressed but I knew it had way more but I ran outta time. Btw when It was crazy fast on the street it was about 11.2:1 afrs. *deep breath**whew* lol.
Stock engine , no header , egr working , swirl valves working , stock cams (91 thou) , 3in intake / exhuast , JWT lightweight flywheel , clutch fan delete.
From what I understand KA engines also loves a tad bit of richness at high RPM. I believe that happy place for alot of power is in the 12.6:1 to 12.4.1 AFR at 6500~7000RPM range. When the engine made 162 WHP my AFR was a 12.5:1, I could of possibly pulled 2 more donkeys running just a tad leaner at 12.6:1. Could of also left the A/Fr at 12.5:1 and tried to tune base timing for an advance of 3, to pull the ecu MAP timing from significant retard. Could of possibly gotten the engine to 165WHP with some minor tweaks and adjustments. When my engine was richer in the 12.2:1 range it was still making power at 157WHP at 6500RPM. So it does seem some what relative to what you are saying about the A/Fr's Dunit.
I'm pretty surprised for the amount of richness that you did have it didn't effect best mean torque. When ever your shooting for that happy peak torque number its better to have the engine a tad leaner. Then when your shooting for peak HP at a really high rpm its better to go a tad richer.
