the 2oo1 dodge neon r/t runs 16.1o @ 87mph with 5spdthe 92 24oSX se runs 16.2s @ 86mph, so your work is cut out for you, its basically driver ability from thereBlackstar wrote:the neon r/ts have 150 hp?! my friend has one 5 speed w/ exhaust who wants to race me (92 240 5speed completely stock). I'd hate to think he might actually win. I'd be so ashamed
Blackstar wrote:thanks for the info/times. How far back did they make the r/t? do only the newer ones have 150 hp?
EnzoRWD wrote:just another perspective on this debate, i was at road america a few weeks ago, and someone was hustling their new black SRT4 around the track, and decided to get all over my butt. even with a KA, i walked away from the dodge. granted, his car was new and he was prolly taking it easy, but looking at the understeer in the rearview mirror, he wasnt letting me go. nonetheless, the little 240 dropped the 250hp dodge.so if u dont mind not being top dawg at the strip, 240's rule. or save your pennies and have some creative fun with your motor choice hehehe-Enzo
EnzoRWD wrote:lol shes a really capable car hehehe. yeah the nittos are about crapped out, new yoko es100's coming in spring, w/ the z brakes. dont worry ill take good care of her.-Enzops i dont think ill be selling it,too much fun. and i also plan on staying KA, in case u care to know
![]()
That's what I was thinkingAntyoo wrote:if it does not have the turbo, it is not an srt4 and only has about 130hp
the srt4 is totally different from all the other neons, sure the block might be the same, but everything on and in it are different.
that is why they call it the srt4 and not a neon, but to me it will always still be a neon
thanks man, and no htat isnt the 'exact' quote, i couldnt remember it, i just remember the jes of the conversation, and i htought it was damn funnyCoastalMtrSprts wrote:LOL I love the sig Nizmo! I think the actual quote though was "So it's a turbo rotary Mustang with headers, right?" The idiot just looks at him and says "oh... yeah, yeah" LOL! Teckademics is awesome:D
nlzmo400r wrote:sounds pretty logical to me, does the new SRT-4 have cariable valve timing?
nlzmo400r wrote: but the new ej25 easily has more power potential, especially with the extra .5 liters
the first and second gen eclipse turbo's (gst and gsx) had the 4g63motor, it was rated at 215hp however, while the evo's was rated at 276hp. The valve cover difference has nothing to do with power, the front mount intercooler helps a bit, and the evo has a 16G turbo, while the eclipse has a smaller turbo (atleast im prety sure) the rest is just tuning.nacho_nissan wrote:well isnt the eclipse(95-99) engine the same as the evo?I think it is,but i think the reason it has a little more power is because it's intercooled and the different valve cover.Could somebody tell me if im right...thanx.
the ej25 is basically a stroke out ej2o, however i hear the internals are stronger than the ej2o's that we got here in america. From what ive heard, the ej25 responds well to mods, but nothing super sensative. Either way, ill take the .5 liters displacement stock, with (imo) better looks, and just an all around cooler car.J-Spec Tuner wrote:I was at a WRX meet and a kid that had a new STI said the motor is basically just a stroked out version of the EJ20 and and doesnt take to modification very well.
Its hard to argue with 230hp and 250tq fore $21,000 even if it is FWD. I would love to have one of those for a daily driver, but the first $20K i get for a "new" car will be spent on a used AWD G35 for daily driving![]()
There are certainly valid criticisms of the Neon/SRT-4 out there. This, however, is not one of them. Does the WRX suck because it's just an Impreza, Subaru's economy car? Does the Evo suck because it's only a Lancer, the King of Crappy Fleet Vehicles?CanadianCoch wrote:all I have to say is at the end of the day he's still driving a NEON, the cheapest car Dodge makes, so he can never really win.