Is the droptop 240 worth gettin

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

Holy ressurected threads, batman!

It's funny to read through these old threads where everyone is like "'verts rock!" :D


SilviaS14KA24DE
Posts: 1121
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:34 pm
Car: Doriftu

Post

240SXedUp wrote:I wouldnt pimp the rims in the first pic.


NOT PIMP THE FIRST PICTURES' RIMS? omg you must be joking. mesh rims w/ deep dish are the way to go. oldschool jap style and drift style. hell, i'd trade my stock chromies to get my hand on some SSR rims!

BoyWonder
Posts: 864
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 10:51 am
Car: '93 Nissan 240SX S13 Convertible (reclaimed... wootles)
Contact:

Post

ah.. people are seeing the light. I know I did.. if mine only drove.. soon enough! :D

TrunkMonkey
Posts: 3190
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 7:48 am
Car: 2000 Lincoln Navigator

Post

S13 Power wrote:The question is im being offered a 92 convertible w/136K for 2800. The asking price was originally 4000. What do you guys think? i could try and haggle more to see if he could drop it down more.
only $2800!!!!

you can't steal a vert for less the $4k around here. go for it.

-demetrius

TrunkMonkey
Posts: 3190
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 7:48 am
Car: 2000 Lincoln Navigator

Post

can't...let...convertible...threads...die...:D .

i love the red vert, but this one is my favorite...



-demetrius

[Zero-S]
Posts: 5295
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 10:56 am
Car: Tell me whats wrong with this picture. 3 240's, only one runs.

Post

I want a vert so bad, but can't really afford it right now:sad

nailed
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2002 9:20 pm

Post

those are freakin sweet

i remember reading that the 'verts were a lot worse in the performance category than the the hard tops. stock handling was also supposedly for ****. any truth to this?

TrunkMonkey
Posts: 3190
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 7:48 am
Car: 2000 Lincoln Navigator

Post

nailed wrote:i remember reading that the 'verts were a lot worse in the performance category than the the hard tops. stock handling was also supposedly for ****. any truth to this?
somewhat true.

if your looking for something to drag, drift, or autocross, then the coupe or fastback are much better platforms. for spirited/daily driving, the convertible isn't as bad as people make it seem. the only issue i have is the chasis flex. on smooth roads, the convertible rides as smooth as silk, and imo, handles just as well as my old fastback. on rough roads, then the body rattles, shakes, creaks, moans, groan, twists, turns...(insert any other descriptions terms you can come up with).

if you just want a fun daily driver, then there's nothing wrong with a 240 vert.

-demetrius

luna11
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 5:18 am

Post

I picked up a nice clean 240sx white convertible last month for $3000..it has 113,500 miles on it,2 yr old perfect top. you just have to keep looking...Can't stay, off to the beach! :)

User avatar
dr!ft
Posts: 1489
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 9:49 am
Car: 1988 Isuzu Trooper II, wish it was a 240...
Contact:

Post

crypt2k wrote:I still dont get why they call it "strawberry" ... but yah... i would look great as in the previous pics.

marshun wrote:one of the first companies to make parts for the conversion.

i think


The Japanese word for "15" sounds a lot like the word for "strawberry". Hence S15 face = Strawberry face.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”