Ok. This is the worst thought out statement ever. If the cross-sectional area of your stock intake pipe is roughly the same as the cross-sectional area of the stock exhaust pipe, do explain how upgrading the exhaust and not the intake is a good idea? You are aware that in order for exhaust to exit your engine, air first has to enter it through the intake, right?A34D4ME wrote:The stock intake flows more than enough air for a N/A motor. So adding a bigger pipe is simply supurflous. The stock exhaust system does not flow enough and therefore leaves room for HP gain via bigger pipes.
I'm also considering 180 whp na ka. You would definately need cams and larger injectors along with a good engine management. A port and polish of the head and upgraded tb will help but I don't think internals will really make much difference when talking about est. 200hp. KA internals are overbuilt. Spend money you save on internals on haltech ems.Silvia_Freak wrote:How hard would it be to make atleast 200hp or more? What would be needed?
Exhaust System (with Test pipe)Underdrive Pulleys.Ground Wire kit.Custom ITB from Suzuki ITB 750cc with custom Pleneum to run FRONT MOUNT COLD AIT INTAKE.Spark PLugs from DENSOSPARK PLUG WIRES from NologyNew BatteryStage 2 Clutch and Fidanza Flywheel.I also already have a Shaved Valves
Also...... I was thinking about doing engine internal work.What is needed for that? What kind of pistons and cams.I was thinking ........from Race Engineering . COmI would by bigger pistons and vavles and have the whole bore and port and polish thing going on. And also a new or used crankshaft balanced and cut.
You're a complete moron. The amount that the fuel is adding to your exhaust gas volume is completely negligable for a few reasons:A34D4ME wrote:Well, first off there is a lot more gas coming out of the exhaust because you are burning fuel in the combustion process. Not trying to be a jerk but if you think that the volume of air (gasses) entering your intake are equal to the volume of exhaust gasses you might want to check out "how stuff works.com" This is the chemical basis of the internal combustion engine.
It's not about adding a small amount of gasoline to your air intake, it's about what happens when you burn it.InsanityInc wrote:
You're a complete moron. The amount that the fuel is adding to your exhaust gas volume is completely negligable for a few reasons:
1) The amount of fuel being injected is small. Generally your A:F will be between 13:1 and 15:1.2) When you react the fuel with the air the gass will get more dense due to the addition of the molecules from the hydrocarbons, but it will barely increase in volume.
So, basically, even if you think that every bit of fuel is extra volume, your exhaust would only be about 7% bigger than your intake, meaning that if you have a 2.75" intake, you'd need a 3" exhaust (give or take). Stock is around 2", if that.
Expansion of gas isn't the same thing as more gas, idiot. Hydrocarbon combustion is an exothermic reaction, meaning it releases energy. In the form of heat, mainly. Heating a gas begets pressure. That pressure then in turn drives your piston. Gas pressure isn't the same thing as more gas. More gas in the same space WILL raise the pressure, but that isn't what occurs in the combustion chamber.A34D4ME wrote:You are saying that the gases given off by combustion are negligible? So you don't know that it is the expansion of these gases that powers your motor? So, a teaspoon of gasoline lit with a match will only produce one teaspoon of gaseous products? As for density - heat and expanding gases are more dense? How on earth do you arive at that conclusion?
You seem to be misunderstanding the fundamentals of chemistry. Gases don't "expand" when they react. Gases only expand to fill the space you put them in. The rising pressure of the gas due to heat forces the piston downward, which in turn creates space for the gas to expand into. Expansion is a result of moving the piston, not the cause.A34D4ME wrote:You know, that thing that happens when you ignite the mixture. Rapidly expanding gases and lots of heat.
No, you don't produce expanding gases you goddamned moron. Light a bomb in a lead box. No expanding gases, because the gases have nowhere to expand. The PRESSURE of the gas rises.A34D4ME wrote:Let me try to explain this one last time. When you react gasoline with oxygen you produce heat and rapidly expanding gases.
I know you think you know how to spell principles, but you don't.A34D4ME wrote:Dude, I promise you. I have spent numerous hours learning this stuff. I know you think you understand these principals but you don't.
Liquid becoming a gas doesn't inherently cause pressure. Try running a combustion engine with an endothermic reaction and see how well that works out for you.A34D4ME wrote:Dude! Increased gaseous products and heat try to expand and cause pressure when acting against a fixed volume. This increased pressure, as a result of heat, and a liquid becoming a gas or gaseous products, cause pressure. This forces the piston down.
Molecules of the same substance don't repel eachother. If they did, you could never form liquids or solids, or any compound at all. Are you talking about electrostatic repulsion? All that does is stops molecules from passing through eachother.A34D4ME wrote:Gee, I don't know - perhaps it has to do with the molecules repelling each other. Basic stuff and yet a light year over your head. I don't suppose you've took organic chemistry?
wow man, maybe throw in a few more personal attacks and people will start to see your points. every tech thread ive seen you post in you are a completely condescending *******. not hugged as a child or just need to get laid? drop the attitude and make an attempt to be civil.InsanityInc wrote:You're a complete moron....you goddamned moronHow retarded are you?Damn, you're an idiot.How dumb are you?
Expanding gases do not cause pressure, because you can change pressure without gases expanding.A34D4ME wrote:blah blah, I dont' have a brain
A34D4ME wrote:Or perhaps you have another convoluted explaination of where all that gasoline goes if not out of your tail pipe in the form of gaseous emissions.
Well to put it bluntly you are right anyways. But you guy's don't have to argue for hours, if we are that confused we can pick up a book.Of course there is more gas coming out of the exhaust burn't or not, and it is denser. Nissan has a tendancy of running ecu tunes richer than leaner in order to keep NOX emissions low, unleaded Octane fuel is much denser than air to begin with (it doesn't take a genius to figure it out). There will be exess fuel that isn't even burnt in the process. Exhaust gasses no matter what is denser.Back pressure is good for streetable cars that want to achieve good gas mileage and pass smog emissions. Without backpressure an EGR assembly would be pointless and serve no function.In the process of adding a high flow CAT I increased my HP, while decreasing my gas mileage. On average I have lost about 1 mile per gallonA34D4ME wrote:Well, first off there is a lot more gas coming out of the exhaust because you are burning fuel in the combustion process. Not trying to be a jerk but if you think that the volume of air (gasses) entering your intake are equal to the volume of exhaust gasses you might want to check out "how stuff works.com" This is the chemical basis of the internal combustion engine.
There is slightly more material coming out than going in, since you're injecting fuel to the charge. But I said that right up front. About 7%. He seems to think that the gas becoming pressurized raises the CFM requirements of the exhaust.Bigvinnie wrote:Well to put it bluntly you are right anyways. But you guy's don't have to argue for hours, if we are that confused we can pick up a book.Of course there is more gas coming out of the exhaust burn't or not, and it is denser.