Cjmartz2k wrote:The 8 blade should be good for 400rwhp, but I wouldn't think a WHOLE lot more than that at reasonable boost levels. I think the biggest limiting factor with the RB20 isn't the displacement, it's the head, so your head work and cams sound like a good idea to me.
I'm confused Cj, after reading this....
"The 8blade hx35 has a 56mm compressor inducer. This is found on 1995-1998 cummins manual pickups. The compressor flows 52 lb/min according to the compressor map. The bolton BEP housing (0.55 a/r) is enough to push the limit of the compressor. There's several 500whp 8blade hx35 cars out there with the bolt on housing. It reaches 20+psi by 3500rpms in 3rd with 272 cams. Smaller cams would equal a faster spool speed in most cases."
What makes the rb20 not capable of achieving the same power levels? Are you saying that it wont make this power without running obscene amounts of boost, or are you saying the head is that much more restrictive than a 4g63 head? Keep in mind we are running the stock divided 12cm2 housing instead of the smaller BEP bolt on housing, this should give us a power advantage at the cost of a few hundred rpm of spool.
There's a couple of 500 whp RB20's in the SAU dyno thread that have stock heads, cams, and bottom end parts. Granted, this is at 23-27 psi boost. If you'd like me to link you I will. I'm not dissagreeing, I just want to know what you know lol.
Thanks