StricNyne wrote:i am gunna be running a hx35 with 6boost mani i am super excited to see this baby in action
twisted99s10 wrote:im running an rb25 and i would love to hit the 500 hp mark, but being a drift car, decent spool time is more important to me im really torn between the hx35 and the hx40 holset turbos.
also, it would be great to get some sort of a grid going with motor - turbo size - minimum upgrades required to run - and estimated hp range. if some one can get me the info id be glad to arrange it all.
Correct sir Post #14 thanks to the DSM guys.Sil240 wrote:Not sure but I believe there is some kinda Grid/Chart at the begining of this thread.
But maybe someone could put all relevant data in the First post of this thread.Maybe check out the DSM and Ford and Dodge forums and put all the info together.
Sweet. Not many poeple use the 50. Think you can get some measurements of the wheels and the shaft of the turbine for me?toadx8u wrote:i just bought a hx50 for my rb26 car...woot woot...now when i get home ill need to put 2 motors together and lay the down
Have you noticed no one seems to post dyno plots of the Holset turbos? I have been waiting for ages to see some solid proof of the claims people make of their spool etc. I have had a long standing interest in them, but given I have seen anything solid enough (other than people using then banging their drum, which is what everyone does for their own choice...) to be sure they are really all that. The fact that there are supposedly heaps of RBs running them with great success, but I haven't seen a dyno plot as proof yet makes me suspicious...twisted99s10 wrote:im running an rb25 and i would love to hit the 500 hp mark, but being a drift car, decent spool time is more important to me im really torn between the hx35 and the hx40 holset turbos.
also, it would be great to get some sort of a grid going with motor - turbo size - minimum upgrades required to run - and estimated hp range. if some one can get me the info id be glad to arrange it all.
MrLith wrote:
Have you noticed no one seems to post dyno plots of the Holset turbos? I have been waiting for ages to see some solid proof of the claims people make of their spool etc. I have had a long standing interest in them, but given I have seen anything solid enough (other than people using then banging their drum, which is what everyone does for their own choice...) to be sure they are really all that. The fact that there are supposedly heaps of RBs running them with great success, but I haven't seen a dyno plot as proof yet makes me suspicious...
I am running a .82 Garrett GT3076R on my stock RB25 on the stock manifold and am making 1.1bar by around 3500rpm and the thing is capable of near 500hp @ wheels if one were to lean on it, they make for awesome response and a wide solid power band... I tend to lean towards going with something proven.
Those aren't Skylines... but since you mention DSMs, here's what at one point was the fastest pump gas/no NOS DSM in the world - running FP 3052 (FP's GT3076R):http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nszA9Z4F0XECjmartz2k wrote:Here are a bunch of results from DSM guys running 2.0L 4G63's. Apples to oranges as far as spool times, but you can see what kind of hp numbers holsets can make
I don't really trust GTechs, I did a run with one and got a crap launch and still did 12.6 @ 124mph when my car was still only a low 13s/112mph car on a proper drag strip.Cjmartz2k wrote:Almost forgot, I'm trapping 126-128mph on a regular basis on the Gtec with mine.
With all due respect, there isn't much to setting up a GTech - beyond it being calibrated (which the software does) and making sure the mounts have good purchase, there surely isn't much more to be done. Of course the marketing is going to say its accurate - though didn't Tesla themselves say that the GTech gives optimistic trap speeds when they released the GTech competitions?Cjmartz2k wrote:Gtecs and the like have been proven to be accurate over and over again as long as they are mounted properly. They have thrown them in 8 seconds awd door slammers and 16 second jeeps and run them down the strip with the same results as the clocks down to 1 mph and .1 second.
No I didn't. I said a mate of mine has an HX40 (!?) 1JZ powered car which is quite a lot laggier than mine, and its the only Holset powered car I have had exposure to. I never said they don't make the power, what I am basically saying is it would be really nice to see something like an HX35/3540/40 dyno plot for an engine I am familiar with. Your video looks really good, definitely promising. I am not here because I want to prove you wrong, I want to be convinced they are worth looking into....Cjmartz2k wrote:You keep bringing up spool and saying holsets are laggy. What do you have to say about my videos? The other thing I think you are saying is that they don't make make the power people claim from them?
Sorry if I come off to argumentative. I don't intend it, I just get a little carried away sometimes I totally understand about wanting to see a dyno on an RB. Hopefully CEF11 on SAU will come through soon. Like I said, Okinawa sucks for anything more technologically advanced than a toaster oven, so no dyno here.MrLith wrote:
No I didn't. I said a mate of mine has an HX40 (!?) 1JZ powered car which is quite a lot laggier than mine, and its the only Holset powered car I have had exposure to. I never said they don't make the power, what I am basically saying is it would be really nice to see something like an HX35/3540/40 dyno plot for an engine I am familiar with. Your video looks really good, definitely promising. I am not here because I want to prove you wrong, I want to be convinced they are worth looking into....
I see what your saying, but it just looks to me like he finished the run a little earlier because he had already made peak torque. As far as the begining, every dyno run I've done I haven't paid real close attention to where I start. I will be the first to admit though, my dyno experience is fairly limited, so I won't argue something didn't change gear ratio wise. I can always PM him and ask though.MrLith wrote:I never said either, actually. I have just never seen a nice "steady" result - one which I feel comfortable in taking a gamble on. For example, the HX40 and GT3076R comparison you posted blatently looks like the ratio the two runs are done with is different - whether its wheel size or a different diff or gearbox. Its not different gear different, but definitely sufficient to make the impression of spool comparable.
Look at it analytically, the dyno run starts at the same power level 4mph earlier than the GT30R one and finishes 10mph earlier - its like the same curve but compressed so the scale is different.
All good - I like to question to get answers, and sometimes a bit of debate is the best way of getting out the best info... definitely no harm done and so long as you know where I am coming from Its very frustrating not having as many of these around to see what they are like.Cjmartz2k wrote:Sorry if I come off to argumentative. I don't intend it, I just get a little carried away sometimes One other thing, I didn't post that dyno graph up because it was a comparison to his old GT30. I didn't even notice it was on there until I saw the later post about him making 680 something and clicked on his build thread. I really don't think it's fair to compare a HX40 to a GT30r. They are in two different leagues. Now the HX35 would be much better to compare to your turbo hp and spool wise. Look at that results thread I post. Most of those guys are trapping high 120's and low 130's with those and amazing spool.
Damn I wish we had a dyno here
A dyno plot would be awesome if its a possibility They are a good equivalent of a GT3076R, which I know I can get 1.2bar before 3700rpm with.bmart wrote:My brother ran 428hp at 17psi with 91 pump gas and 440cc injectors on his hx35 1jz this summer. His turbo starts making boost around 3800rpm and is at full boost by 4200rpm. I might be able to get you his dyno chart if you want it.