Has the NAACP outlived its usefulness?

A place for intelligent and well-thought-out discussion involving politics and associated topics. No nonsense will be tolerated at all.
User avatar
CakeDaddy
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:58 am
Car: Y34,Pathfinder SE, Mercedes CLK500AMG Sport Pkg & A Fleet of Premium Avis Rental Cars

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:
Speaking of ignorant comments. I was pointing out a fallacy in his argument. You have done nothing but criticize, at least I was offering a thought based on something other than hatred.
I think you got handled appropiately(sp) in a statement by Rjdmm, so take that lesson and learn from it. Thats all!
OriginalWheelman wrote:None of my black friends have a problem with me calling them black. :
Fine... call them what you want, but if and when they choose to be called African Americans... what are you going to do?


User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

CakeDaddy wrote:Fine... call them what you want, but if and when they choose to be called African Americans... what are you going to do?
Stop being friends with them. I don't waste my time with people who use semantics to start arguments.

User avatar
CakeDaddy
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:58 am
Car: Y34,Pathfinder SE, Mercedes CLK500AMG Sport Pkg & A Fleet of Premium Avis Rental Cars

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:
Stop being friends with them. I don't waste my time with people who use semantics to start arguments.
Typical! Im not even suprised by that answer.

My work is done here!!! The ignorance from some of you is starting to seep out through the monitor into my pores and its making my stomach hurt.
Modified by CakeDaddy at 8:30 PM 5/6/2009

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

CakeDaddy wrote:
Typical! Im not even suprised by that answer.
I could say the same thing about your statements.

Every (with VERY few exceptions) American's ancestors that came here from somewhere else. Claiming to be *-American is stupid unless you are from there originally and immigrated.

User avatar
rjdmmfl1
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:52 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe, Radiant Silver, 3.5SE, Premium Package, VDC

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:


Wow, so conservatives are against equal rights? Race traitors? What bothers me are people like you, that have never known the discrimination of which you speak, holding it against people like me, who have never discriminated against anyone.
Yes, many conservatives are aginst equal rights.. all, no nothing is absolute...

and yes , folks that championed things such as equal rights back then were referred to as race traitors back then... now its those darned leftist liberals....

and by the way, I'm from the deep south, lived there for 22 years Jacksonville , Fl (north Florida not south Florida) and Atlanta, GA.. I've had my fair share of discrimination, not that that's something to brag about
AZhitman wrote:
Just the type of stereotypical thinking and revisionist thinking I'd expect from someone in SoCal.
uhh, I was born and raised in the deep south for the first 22 years of my life... any of your family members pass down stories of a great uncle lynched in the south? I doubt it. ANy of your family members march in Selma? maybe, mine did, and they were jailed , and hosed, and all that other crap ya'll watch on TV, I have grandparents that LIVED it
AZ wrote:
To ASSUME (as you have) that all slaves were Black is ignorant.

To ASSUME that all were of African descent is ignroant as well.

To ASSUME they were all treated horribly is ignorant (many owned homes on the land, raised their families, owned livestock, and even had retirement and pensions). You wouldn't accept that, though.

To ASSUME widespread abuse (you even go so far as to imply sexual abuse, perhaps even rape) tells me you've already made up your mind. I have to wonder where you learned so much... stories passed down through the generations? No? Textbooks? No? Ever LIVE in the deep south?
I actually didn't assume any of those things, don't put words in my mouth, what do I now need t preference slaves in america with saying that not all were black, mistreated, abused? NO, when speaking of slavery in America, these are the assumed truths, I didn't start that. NO, not all slaves were abused, raped, and black, but in THE UNITED STATES OF AMERIKKKA , mmany or most of them were... you spend your nights trying to re-write history if you want to, I wwon't even engage those comments any further
AZ wrote:I grew up in the deep south. 14 years. I saw the aftereffects. My grade school had seperate drinking fountains and restrooms, although the words "White" and "Colored" had been painted over a few years prior (but still visible).

Made me upset, even as a child. (I always wondered, what did they do about the Korean kids? The Mulatto kids? The Haitians? There were many of them in my classes.)
I love hearing stories like this of how upset these things made you.. and maybe they did.. but YOU didn't live through them, and neither did I, but your stance on things today are a far cry from being the supportive freedom fighter that you're making yourself out to be with your "being upset at the painted over sign of colored or white" ...

the point that you [being of Aremnian blood (since you don't like Armenian-American and ] and many jews do not see is that, depending on the degree of ignorance of a potential biggot, you may or may not be able to just sneak through and not be a victim of racism... not that you haven't experienced it, but that it is not written on your face the way it is for blacks. That is something that you will just never understand, anymore than I will understand what its like to be a poor kid from some backwoods town in Arkansas.
AZ wrote: I take offense to that. Apparently, because I don't see a need for the NAACP, I may harbor some racist ideology? I'd suggest you read up on me a little. Nothing could be further from the truth.

By the way, why can't I gain admission to Alcorn State? Why couldn't my mother?

Exclusionary.
no, its not that that means you harbor some racist ideology, it simply means that you are blind to the very REAL need for the organizations to protect those not in power from those that would, if left unchecked, try to keep power to themsleves and to those that look like them.

Also, regarding ALcorn state, I don't know why you couldn't gain admission, if you really tried... but there are whites at Alcorn state now, and Morehouse, and almost every other HBCU.... as Hannibal mentioned, my alma mater graduated its first white valedictorian last year, and that brother (white guy but still 100% my brother) turned down acceptances to Harvard, Yale, and Princeton to attend Morehouse College. So it defintely happens, its not that these schools are exclusionary, but they exist to give many folks who otherwise would not be able to get an education that opportunity. How does that TAKE AWAY from your opportunities?
AZ wrote:I'm saddened that you have deduced that I'm aligned with those who refuse to become colorblind. I'm going to leave that as an unfortunate misconception on your part, because I know in my heart it's inaccurate.
I didn't say nor have I deduced that you have aligned yourself with folks that refuse to become colorblind... however, in your efforts to be colorblind, you are blind to the true racism that still exists and the need to combat that racism in an organized manner... i.e. the NAACP.... from this point, let's just agree to disagree... I have no delusions that I will change you or wheelman's views on this subject, and to get back to the OP's question...honestly, it doesn't matter because the NAACP is here to stay... that is until genoism takes place of racism and we find a new way to seperate ourselves from other people!
hannibal wrote:^ too much at once!

I dunno if youre banned from this site yet, but you gotta say one peice at a time. Thats a lot to digest if its the first time someone's considered it.

Expect the majority of your posts (no matter the subject) to be dismissed from now on...
I don't thin I've said anything that warrants Greg banning me...

also, I'm not much worried about my posts being dismissed, I just don't spend much time in the politics forum ... its all arguing in circles, different people expressing their views aboutstuff that they have absolutely NO control over... its like the room where the old guys argue about what's wrong with society and complain about all the liberal stuff going on in the country... it makes for good comical relief sometimes, but my days and nights don't begin and end with folks in the forum's opinions... its all just random banter!
Modified by rjdmmfl1 at 7:41 PM 5/6/2009

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

AZhitman wrote:Just the type of stereotypical thinking and revisionist thinking I'd expect from someone in SoCal.
A little ironic that you stereotype people from socal when accusing another of stereotyping, no?


User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Nice editing of my quote.

User avatar
LongBeachCoupe
Posts: 9482
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:43 pm
Car: 08 Altima Coupe (RIP Hurricane Sandy)
2005 Lexus RX

Post

I dont usually look in the politics section as I really dont want to know most peoples political views and most of the people here dont agree with me and I dont want to know their thoughts... so I cant hold it against them. I felt the need to toss my 2 cents into the ring on this one though...
WDRacing wrote:
I've encountered race issues in several places, from bars to stores where I buy music related software and supplies. How exactly? There was a group of black guys hanging out in every situation this has happened, I went about what I needed to do, be it having a drink or buying midi cables. In each instance I've been "eye balled", crowded and it's gone as far as me being told to leave. I'm a 34yr old white male. I've lived in several countries and been to 12. The only thing I can say I am is prejudice against stupid. But dumb has no color. I don't walk around with a chip on my shoulder either.

To say black people can't be racist is naive and basically one of the most ignorant things I've ever heard. Sure, it's the other guys fault right? BS...

Does racism exist? Hell yeah it does...but it's on every side from every race/color/creed. It's not a white vs thing...hasn't been for years. Racism is perpetuated by the ignorant. So pick a side, you're either stupid, or you're not. There is NO other way of looking at it.

For the record, I've experienced racism from asian/latin/european people not just blacks. I'd also jump and support any person no matter the color/creed/race if they were being attacked for no good reason aside from their color. Why? Because it's the right thing to do.

Perpetuation of racism is every one's problem. And no, I think the NAACP still has some work cut out...
I agree with WD here for the most part, I have experienced racism in a local town where it is mostly Persian residents and store owners, and been given the cold shoulder by korean store owners as well (when I was doing outside sales). I have also been looked at with a ghost face when someone makes a wise remark about jews (thinking I am Italian) and then I drop the bomb on them and watch them try and convince me they were just joking.

Ive also had someone look at the top of my head thinking that I would actually have horns because I am jewish!
DJ Raijin wrote:
The "Klan" is a joke. ..... They now have less than 500 members nationally.
You HAVE to be joking, 500? 500 in texas maybe!

I am going to skip over the Dr Feelgood and Hitman battle and state my point, which ties back to WD's post.

If you are (white, black. latino, asian, jewish, catholic, muslim or anything else) there will ALWAYS be a place where people look/treat you differently because you are an outlier in their community, and their ignorance compels them to believe that only "their own kind" is good. This is pretty much uniform across all areas to some extent IMO.

Ignorance kills.


Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

AZhitman wrote:Also, slavery has no place in this discussion.

Feel free to wallow in the miseries of ancestry, but the rest of us choose to live in the present.
Thank You! I'm probably the only uneducated backwoods hillbilly in this thread, I grew up in rural PA around racism. I'm not racist though, so I will share my thoughts. I believe in Equal rights between you and me and whoever else who is Legally in this country (don't get me started on illegal's). What I don't understand is how any black person thinks they deserve something from their ancestors enslavement? It's the past, let it be the past. I don't want to hear how anyone deserves anything because of their ancestors. My ancestors were poor a** Irish immigrants, dirt poor. Should I be given money because my ancestors struggled? No.


Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

CakeDaddy wrote:Sigh Sigh Sigh! You have to respect the wishes of the ones who prefer to be called African American. It would not be in your best interest to call a group of African Americans “black” while in their company, especially when you know they prefer to be called otherwise. Be smart not ignorant! You sound real tough behind that computer screen but in the real world I’m sure you'd be on your best behavior and will respect the African Americans that are in your presence.
I would never. I don't use phrases like that, I call you what you are. Got a problem? I don't care. I was brought up to call them how I see them. I'm not an Irish-german American, I'm a legal citizen of the united states, therefore I'm American, as are YOU. Your not african american, your a damn red white and blue American. I think saying someone is "anything" American is retarded. I think we all love our country and the freedoms we have here, therefore I call you all Americans and nothing else. If you don't love your country and feel discriminated against, you know where the door is.

Btw, I've always called black people black and have yet to find one get upset with me. I have had a black guidance counsler who kept me from getting turned down the wrong path, and I had a black tutor who helped me when I had struggled in middle school. All great American men.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

CakeDaddy wrote:
Sigh Sigh Sigh! You have to respect the wishes of the ones who prefer to be called African American. It would not be in your best interest to call a group of African Americans “black” while in their company, especially when you know they prefer to be called otherwise. Be smart not ignorant! You sound real tough behind that computer screen but in the real world I’m sure you'd be on your best behavior and will respect the African Americans that are in your presence.
Spare me the life lesson, youngster.

I refuse to use a word. Not a damn thing anyone can do about it.

Doesn't make me a bigot, a racist, or even disrespectful.

I have a rght to speak as I choose, and I have a right to NOT speak.

Maybe if you'd come to an event, or knew me better, you'd see I can find common grond with ANYONE damn near instantly. It's part of what makes me good at what I do.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

CakeDaddy wrote:
Typical! Im not even suprised by that answer.

My work is done here!!! The ignorance from some of you is starting to seep out through the monitor into my pores and its making my stomach hurt.
Then you've got some thin skin.

It's gotta suck to be you, letting all this intellectual discourse get you all physically ill. God forbid you ever have to deal with REAL stressors.

Life's tough - Wear a helmet.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

C-Kwik wrote:A little ironic that you stereotype people from socal when accusing another of stereotyping, no?
Well-done.

I stand corrected and educated.

"Typical" of Chano.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

rjdmmfl1 wrote: NO, when speaking of slavery in America, these are the assumed truths, I didn't start that.
But you perpetuate it.

To what gain?

Are you gonna change things for those who were treated horribly?

You've bought an assumption and adopted it as truth. That's dangerous.
rjdmmfl1 wrote: in THE UNITED STATES OF AMERIKKKA , mmany or most of them were...
And you know this how?
rjdmmfl1 wrote:you spend your nights trying to re-write history if you want to, I wwon't even engage those comments any further
Because they go against your worldview? Or because they shine a bright light on the assumptions that PERPETUATE anger and hate?

The "AmeriKKKa" thing is juvenile, tacky, offensive, and bigoted in its own right. My father, brothers, friends and uncles fought and bled for this country.

Perhaps you'd prefer to live in a country that offers better opportunities to you.

Oh wait - There isn't one.
rjdmmfl1 wrote:your stance on things today are a far cry from being the supportive freedom fighter that you're making yourself out to be
I never said any such thing. But I *DO* bring people together. people of all races, backgrounds and heritages, based on a common shared interest. In fact, that's the driving force behind this forum. Come out to a meet sometime, you'll see - For me, it's ALL about the people. I could give a damn about the cars.

What are YOU doing to foster better relations between people of differing backgrounds?
rjdmmfl1 wrote: the point that you and many jews do not see
How did I get lumped in with just the Jewish people? How about light-skinned Blacks? Croatians? American Indians? Germans?

Or, is it for you, as I fear, ALL about skin color? Ah, I see.

Well, bummer. I got nothing. Can't argue with that watertight logic.
rjdmmfl1 wrote:Also, regarding ALcorn state, I don't know why you couldn't gain admission, if you really tried...
Guess I didn't want to have to justify myself based on my merits, and not my skin color. I HATE when that happens.
rjdmmfl1 wrote:honestly, it doesn't matter because the NAACP is here to stay...
Hmmm. What if I'd said, "It doesn't matter, because the GOB Network is here to stay."

That'd be perceived as short-sighted and probably a bit delusional.
rjdmmfl1 wrote:I don't thin I've said anything that warrants Greg banning me...
Not at all. I'd defend the right to speak your mind FAR beyond what you probably would expect of me, and I respect your opinions.

User avatar
rjdmmfl1
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:52 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe, Radiant Silver, 3.5SE, Premium Package, VDC

Post

to quickly respond, yes, the GOB network is here to stay... not delusional, its reality... people in power don't easily relinquish it, it is usually taken away.. and I don't see anyone getting rid of that network...

If you re-read my statement regarding Jews and you being of Armenian descent, it was merely to point out that some folks of diverse background can blend in more easily and be mistaken as a being "Anglo-Saxon"... not so is the case of colored folks (and by colored I mean all darker skinned folks that have "I'm not Anglo Saxon " stamped on their forheads.

And ur right, my goal in life is not focused on bringing everyone togther . It would be great, and I would love to see it, but history has shown that, on a global scale, by and large that's a tall order. My goal is, however, to help minority students achieve success in their career paths of science and or medicine. I have doe this on a small scale for the past ten years, but have bigger plans on a large scale to reach far more people than I previously have. Sure I could focus on trying to get EVERYONE into school, but there's a certan subset of folks that lack proper advisement and support, and those are the folks that I choose to help. Does that make me a racist because I have decided to focus on a select taget group? No! Does it make me exclusionary because i have focued on one needy roup rather than trying to save the world all at once? I don't think so..It means I have focused my resources on reacing a particular population, but I am not holding anyone else back that wants to achieve their goals. So to does the NAACP focus on its target group.

That's all I'm saying...

In regards to AmeriKKKa, I and many folks feel just as strongly about this as you probably feel against it. I've read ridiculous comments about "if you don't like America, you know where the door is" .. funny thing is, many of these same folks sit around a bit*h about what they don't like about the country, the goverment, and how their gun rights are violated, and all of this other crap, but the second we complain about our treatment, we're told to just accept it or leave the country...lol... that's hilarious... NO, we will continue to call AmeriKKKa out for what it is, along with being the land of opportunity and the land of freedom, and the best country to live in, it still has its myriad of flaws, including racist laws that continue to affect minorities at disproportionate rates (i.e. coacaine posession vs crack possesion). And until we feel like we truly have a legitimate and unbiased shot at the American dream, we will continue to feel like we are outsiders living behind enemy lines, unwelcomed and discriminated against. Regardless of what you are, you are not black and you will never understand this... and for the folks that argue, "look at you, your at so and so school, you clearly had a legitimate shot" ... well, regardless of the fact that by many measures I'm smarter than 99% of the population, I still needed Affirmative Action sanctioned programs to make me competitive enough to be accepted into my current institution. The fact of the matter is that I couldn't have been "as good" as many of my white counterparts that applied for this program, I had to be better... AND I AM! If you don't see the in-equality in that, then we are truly talking in circles here.


Modified by rjdmmfl1 at 3:07 AM 5/7/2009

Logan76
Posts: 7983
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 6:06 am
Car: Junk

Post

rjdmmfl1 wrote:In regards to AmeriKKKa, I and many folks feel just as strongly about this as you probably feel against it. I've read ridiculous comments about "if you don't like America, you know where the door is" .. funny thing is, many of these same folks sit around a bit*h about what they don't like about the country, the goverment, and how their gun rights are violated, and all of this other crap, but the second we complain about our treatment, we're told to just accept it or leave the country...lol... that's hilarious... NO, we will continue to call AmeriKKKa out for what it is, along with being the land of opportunity and the land of freedom, and the best country to live in, it still has its myriad of flaws, including racist laws that continue to affect minorities at disproportionate rates (i.e. coacaine posession vs crack possesion). And until we feel like we truly have a legitimate and unbiased shot at the American dream, we will continue to feel like we are outsiders living behind enemy lines, unwelcomed and discriminated against. Regardless of what you are, you are not black and you will never understand this... and for the folks that argue, "look at you, your at so and so school, you clearly had a legitimate shot" ... well, regardless of the fact that by many measures I'm smarter than 99% of the population, I still needed Affirmative Action sanctioned programs to make me competitive enough to be accepted into my current institution. The fact of the matter is that I couldn't have been "as good" as many of my white counterparts that applied for this program, I had to be better... AND I AM! If you don't see the in-equality in that, then we are truly talking in circles here.
Do you seriously think you didn't have an unbiased shot at your dream in life? Honestly. As citizens of this country we all have our rights to b**** about it, but unless any of us get off our a** and do anything about it (i.e. contact your state Representative, vote, etc) all we are doing is just that, b****ing. Your correct in your statements that I am not black, and therefore will never understand the problems you say you face. You on the other hand are not white, for some reason you are oblivious to the fact that if I walked down a street in a majorly black city I would be discriminated against. You think I could get a job at a black owned business? There is two sides to your argument, and to say that black people or any minority are the only people to be discriminated against, is just ridiculous. I also don't have any numbers on hand, but I would be curious to see just by how much black people are a minority in this country, I would say not by much.

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

rjdmmfl1 wrote:t I still needed Affirmative Action sanctioned programs to make me competitive enough to be accepted into my current institution.
Please explain in detail how you would not be where you were today w/o affirmative action as you claim. If you are as smart / smarter then I don't believe you needed it at all. Did AA NEED to intervene? Or are you using your ancillary success as a justification when AA had nothing to do with it?

User avatar
rjdmmfl1
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:52 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe, Radiant Silver, 3.5SE, Premium Package, VDC

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:
Please explain in detail how you would not be where you were today w/o affirmative action as you claim. If you are as smart / smarter then I don't believe you needed it at all. Did AA NEED to intervene? Or are you using your ancillary success as a justification when AA had nothing to do with it?


Well, actually I explained this in my prvious post on the first page... here's my quote from that page...
rjdmmfl1 wrote:Affirmative Action:this is a double edged sword, and most folks just choose one side to cut with. Clarence Thomas, who is the biggest pariah in the black community, sees affirmative action as a chronic crutch for people of color. In a perfect society, he'd be right, and we wouldn't need affirmative action... but unfortunately society isn't perfect, and we do ned some of these programs. I am personally a product of affirmative action, but not in the way folks may choose to look at it. The MD/PhD program at Johns Hopkins is arguably the most difficult academic program to enter in the country, with an acceptance rate of around 3%. And although my test scores and GPA were both at the top of the applicant pool, it was my research experiences at the Natiuonal Institutes of Health and Yale University that put me over the top (via letters of recommendation from the Dean of yale's graduate school and the director of the Heart lung and blood institute... HOWEVER, both of those summer research experiences were afirmative action programs that did not TAKE AWAY opportunities for majority folks, but merely added created funding for additional students , particularly students of color to be exposed to the field of biomedical research, a field that these students for many reasons were previously cut off from.

So, my point is, without those programs in place to make me a serious candidate for admission, I doubt I would be a Hopkins students right now. Also, the fact that the NIH mandates that these MD/PhD programs accept a diverse student population (and not fill each class with say all white males) is another reason that I am there... but they didn't have to lower their standards to accept me (as many opponents of affirmative action feel happens )I mention my personal situation only as a means to clartify my stance on affirmative action, and how some of these programs truly give minority students the chance to compete on an already unlevel playing field.
THose two AA sanctioned programs are what put me over the top compared to many other in my applicant pool, specifically the high priority letters of recommendation that came from those internships.

THe NIH internship was also made possible because it was organized through a joint venture with another AA program, the MARC/USTAR (minority access to research careers/ undergraduate student training for academic research) program... again, a program that does not take away chances from anyone else, but identifies individuals that are grossly underrepresented in the field of biomedical research, and provides a unique program aimed at introducing those individuals to these opportunities.

So even with my GPA and test scores, without the MARC program, The MARC/NIH internship program, and the AA Yale BioSTEP research programs, my introduction to the field of biomedical research may not have happened....

i understand that it can be argued that perhaps, some way, I could have tried to do these internships on my own, but the fact of the matter is, if you have 100 students applying to a program, and all of them have 4.0 GPAs, and 80 of them are white, 15 are Asian, 4 are Indian, and 1 is black, what are the chances that that one black student will be accepted? If they only take 5, then 5% chance right. Well what many of these programs do is akin to providing additional funding for another two spots, and target those positions for students that are traditionally under-represented in that field. So now, you can take that black student with the 4.0 GPA and allow him to participate, hoping that he will perform as expected, and build the resumé that will be deemed competitive to programs like this program at Hopkins.
Logan76 wrote:
Do you seriously think you didn't have an unbiased shot at your dream in life? Honestly. As citizens of this country we all have our rights to b**** about it, but unless any of us get off our a** and do anything about it (i.e. contact your state Representative, vote, etc) all we are doing is just that, b****ing. Your correct in your statements that I am not black, and therefore will never understand the problems you say you face. You on the other hand are not white, for some reason you are oblivious to the fact that if I walked down a street in a majorly black city I would be discriminated against. You think I could get a job at a black owned business? There is two sides to your argument, and to say that black people or any minority are the only people to be discriminated against, is just ridiculous. I also don't have any numbers on hand, but I would be curious to see just by how much black people are a minority in this country, I would say not by much.
not quite sure where you gathered that I daid that blacks were the only ones discriminated against... not out of my mouth... and yes, the reaction of many blacks if you walked down the street in south central today would be one of hostility, but that would have more to do with the local history of that particular area... justifiably so "in their minds" if you were walking down Compton blvd, you are either a cop, or a PI, or a bounty hunter, or just generally on a suicide mission. again, as percieved in the minds of the local constituency.

also, regarding blacks being minorites, I'm not sure what you mean by "not by much" last I checked, the U.S. consisted of about 74% whites, and about 13% blacks... how is that not a minority by much???

In any case, as I stated, individuals on both sides of this issue will not ever be pursuaded to the other side of the argument, but one would hope that individuals on both sides at least hear where the other side is coming from.

As Obama stated in his speech on race, many of the very real social issues regarding race are deep rooted, and are largely generational and demographic. From my experience, where someone lives in this country and their exposure to individuals from different ethnic groups determines their particular world view, and it doesn't make them right or wrong, it just makes them a potential slave to what they've been fed by TV and news media.

When I first got to Hopkins, one of my classmates [from Sri Lanka] was shocked to see so many African Americans as 1st year MD/PhD students. Out of the 13 students in the program, 6 were black, a number that is really uncommon for other similar programs in the country (most programs have 1 or 2 in the whole program, we have 20 at Hopkins) in any case, he very innocently stated that "I didn't know you people were interested in higher education"... being that he was foreign, we didn't immediately go with our gut instinct to slap the $hit out of him, we simply asked him to expound. He then stated that in his country, the only portrayals they see of blacks in America were negative, be it through movies or the news reported there. And when he got to America (Stanford undergrad) the only blacks he saw were athletes or chefs. His comments were taken at face value and we totally understood where he was coming from.

I think a similar thing happens here. Contrary to many folks opinions, there are tons of good hard working African Americans in this country. However, for someone that lives in rural arkansas that sees these positive citizens as often as he sees the local unicorn, then to him, they really don't exist, and its easy to get delusioned into thinking that all blacks are what they see on TV. That is NOT his fault, he may be ignorant, but its not his fault! Media and hollywood has a lot to do with that portrayal. Out of the 30+ million African Amercans in this country, there are tens if not hundreds of thousands of families with the same hard work values that the Obamas have, or that my parents have...( not necessarily making as much money, but hardworking nonetheless) but that is not what gets portrayed, thus the continued unease amongst many whites in this country towards blacks.

So too can be said about the opinions that many blacks that live in the ghetto have regarding ,whites, the police, and the goverment. Much of that is fed by local social norms that make it OK and normal to say negative things about "The man", and how he is holding us down. (To some extent, that is not entirely BS, but mostly it is) As far as the cops go, don't get me started there.. the fear we feel regarding cops is very real, and necessary in most cases, depending on which parts of the country you live in... but that's a different discussion

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

So two more internships were created, but they were given out based on race. The decision was based on race. That makes it racist to me. Those two positions could have been created and given tot he most qualified people, not the most qualified minority, so I would have to say that yes, it did take away an opportunity. You hit the nail on the head when you said "I could have done it the traditional way." There is the problem. We HAVE to do it the traditional way, and BE THE BEST to get the internships, because we're white and don't qualify for the minority internships. How is saying "You can't have this job, it was created for and is being saved for a minority." any different than saying "You can't have this job, it was created for and is being saved for a white person." ? It isn't. They are qualifying or disqualifying someone based on their race. I'm being denied that internship because of the color of MY skin.

Furthermore, why is it int he racism debate it's always "white people" White people is a catch all term that doesn't address the situation. There are Italians, Greeks, Jews, English, french, etc, all with their own cultures and their own ways of life, yet we are all lumped into "whites" for the sake of calling us a majority. I'm a mutt. My mother's predominately English parents HATE my Italian / Irtish / Norwegian father. The is no white solidarity as many int he black community would like us to believe. There was a time in the history of the US that each of these races were persecuted. In your example you do not even portray an accurate mix of people. 80% white people, 15% Asian, 4% Indian and 1% black? You yourself said blacks are 13% of the population. Furthermore, what does it matter how many of these people are black? The most qualified people should get the job. If a black guy beats me on a test and earns that internship, good for him, but if he scores lower than me and gets the job based SOLELY ON THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN, damn right I'm mad. I'd be just as mad id I was selected instead of the black guy that scored higher than me because he's black. I would never work for someone who would be like that.

I come from a poor white family. My brother is certified white trash. My father is 56 years old and has never owned a house, never owned a new car. I'm the first in my family to go to college, and I work damn hard to make sure I succeed. Can you sit there and tell me you honestly believe it's right for me to be passed over for a job because some black guy "needs a hand"? What about me? I worked 2 jobs and did 14 credit hours to support my family while I went to school. I should be passed up for a job because "There aren't enough black people in this field"???

This blatant double standard CREATES racism.

User avatar
rjdmmfl1
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:52 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe, Radiant Silver, 3.5SE, Premium Package, VDC

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:So two more internships were created, but they were given out based on race. The decision was based on race. That makes it racist to me. Those two positions could have been created and given tot he most qualified people, not the most qualified minority, so I would have to say that yes, it did take away an opportunity. You hit the nail on the head when you said "I could have done it the traditional way." There is the problem. We HAVE to do it the traditional way, and BE THE BEST to get the internships, because we're white and don't qualify for the minority internships. How is saying "You can't have this job, it was created for and is being saved for a minority." any different than saying "You can't have this job, it was created for and is being saved for a white person." ? It isn't. They are qualifying or disqualifying someone based on their race. I'm being denied that internship because of the color of MY skin.

Furthermore, why is it int he racism debate it's always "white people" White people is a catch all term that doesn't address the situation. There are Italians, Greeks, Jews, English, french, etc, all with their own cultures and their own ways of life, yet we are all lumped into "whites" for the sake of calling us a majority. I'm a mutt. My mother's predominately English parents HATE my Italian / Irtish / Norwegian father. The is no white solidarity as many int he black community would like us to believe. There was a time in the history of the US that each of these races were persecuted. In your example you do not even portray an accurate mix of people. 80% white people, 15% Asian, 4% Indian and 1% black? You yourself said blacks are 13% of the population. Furthermore, what does it matter how many of these people are black? The most qualified people should get the job. If a black guy beats me on a test and earns that internship, good for him, but if he scores lower than me and gets the job based SOLELY ON THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN, damn right I'm mad. I'd be just as mad id I was selected instead of the black guy that scored higher than me because he's black. I would never work for someone who would be like that.

I come from a poor white family. My brother is certified white trash. My father is 56 years old and has never owned a house, never owned a new car. I'm the first in my family to go to college, and I work damn hard to make sure I succeed. Can you sit there and tell me you honestly believe it's right for me to be passed over for a job because some black guy "needs a hand"? What about me? I worked 2 jobs and did 14 credit hours to support my family while I went to school. I should be passed up for a job because "There aren't enough black people in this field"???

This blatant double standard CREATES racism.
I don't think you read my post correctly at all, as is the case for most ofmy posts... for this reason, this may be my last post on this topic...

regarding the application pool I mentioned 100 students applying for a research position at the NIH for his program, the pool of individuals applying to these programs do not represent the population of the public. It just so happens that most individuals that identify themselves as white or asian, or indian are the ones that applying to these particular program. What you so blindly FAILED to see in my scenario, is that that ALL of the individuals had the same GPA (whih is the ONLy thing one can really base application to this program on being that these are students straight out of freshmen year in college), thus equally qualified. In such a case, if you are randomly selecting individuals, there much less of a chance for blacks and indians to get in this program than it is for a white to enter the program. That's if , all other things being considered equal, they were slected randomly. For many reasons not mentioned in my statement, there are far less black applicant applying to these types of programs.. which leads to there being far less blacks doing biomedical research as careers.

However, by definition, when the number of folks in a particular field from a particular ethnicity do not not represent the number of those folks in the U.S. population, that is recognized as a disparity. And recognizing these diparities, ther are programs aimed at trying to increase the number of qualified individuals from that ethnic group. Under this premise, and for this purpose, programs are created to expose individuals from ethnic groups who have historically not had exposure to these programs the ability to explore them.

If you want to incease the number of black scientists, and it has been identified that lack of exposure or finances is a reason that , as a whole, these individuals are not represented in the field, then you provide the exposure and finances for those individuals to possibly increase those numbers. What this may boil down to is the fact that the federal goverment feels there is a need to increase the number of black scentist, and pehaps you do not. And from that basis, then of course you will not agree with anything the government comes up with to achiev that goal, a goal that you find to be asinine!

regarding "racism" debates, I thin people use the common terms that folks identify themselves as... perhaps you check "other" on the box when you apply for jobs, maybe you don't. But obviously 74% of the folks on the census checked "white" whether they be of Armenian descent like Greg, or French- Italian-German descent, like someone else. Like it or not, whether someone is of Italian-French, or whatever descent, many of them identify themsleves as white, not "other" (although some do ) and so does the U.S. goverment... basicaly, if you pass the white sheet of paper test, regardless of true ethnicity, they view you as white, and you are entitled to the lack of police brutailty and everything else that goes along with that. (I'm not being literal, but hopefully you get the picture)

Lastly, I wil say this about this preferential treatment you seem to be so ticked off about. And again, I'll use my personal example regarding this... I am not particularly in favor of giving anyone with "lesser" qualifications a nod over someone with "greater" qualifications just to lend them a hand. i would have hoped that you had gathered that from my statement of my qualifications as a premed student, as well as the scenario I put forth with all candidates being equal. IMO, allowing a lesser qualified individual to have a job or obtainin a position will ultimately end in failure for both the applicant and the emplyer.

As such, I am NOT in favor of admitting minority students to medical school with lesser stats .. I AM NOT!!! It is indeed not fair!!! however, in the case of having equally qualified applicants, if accepting a minority student at a disproportiante rate of the applicant pool contributes to increasing the diversity of the workforce, then that idea I support. The devil is in the details of any program... and I am a firm believer that diversity does NOT a have to come at the expense of lowered standards.

However, what I am trying to get you, and other opponents of Affirmative Action to understand is that

A. it does NOT always lead to a company or institution accepted "lower qualified" minority students Does this happen Yes, and that is why I am not a blind supporter of all AA programs, but most opponents are blind opponents of al AA programs without examining each one in detail

B. Providing an additional opportunity that would otherwise NOT exist does not take away opportunities for anyone else. On this point, I think we will continue to disagree!

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

rjdmmfl1 wrote:
I don't think you read my post correctly at all, as is the case for most ofmy posts... for this reason, this may be my last post on this topic...

regarding the application pool I mentioned 100 students applying for a research position at the NIH for his program, the pool of individuals applying to these programs do not represent the population of the public. It just so happens that most individuals that identify themselves as white or asian, or indian are the ones that applying to these particular program. What you so blindly FAILED to see in my scenario, is that that ALL of the individuals had the same GPA (whih is the ONLy thing one can really base application to this program on being that these are students straight out of freshmen year in college), thus equally qualified. In such a case, if you are randomly selecting individuals, there much less of a chance for blacks and indians to get in this program than it is for a white to enter the program. That's if , all other things being considered equal, they were slected randomly. For many reasons not mentioned in my statement, there are far less black applicant applying to these types of programs.. which leads to there being far less blacks doing biomedical research as careers.
So then your example is arbitrary and means nothing. What if 100 applied and 80 were Black, 14 were Asian, 4 were Indian, and 1 was White. Do we need a organization to get the white guy the job?
rjdmmfl1 wrote:However, by definition, when the number of folks in a particular field from a particular ethnicity do not not represent the number of those folks in the U.S. population, that is recognized as a disparity. And recognizing these diparities, ther are programs aimed at trying to increase the number of qualified individuals from that ethnic group. Under this premise, and for this purpose, programs are created to expose individuals from ethnic groups who have historically not had exposure to these programs the ability to explore them.

If you want to incease the number of black scientists, and it has been identified that lack of exposure or finances is a reason that , as a whole, these individuals are not represented in the field, then you provide the exposure and finances for those individuals to possibly increase those numbers. What this may boil down to is the fact that the federal goverment feels there is a need to increase the number of black scentist, and pehaps you do not. And from that basis, then of course you will not agree with anything the government comes up with to achiev that goal, a goal that you find to be asinine!
And you fail to answer my point again. WHY DOES THERE NEED TO BE A EQUAL REPRESENTATION IN ALL JOB FIELDS? So what if there are less black people in a job? WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING!! NOTHING OTHER THAN THE COLOR OF THE SKIN OF THE PEOPLE GETTING THE JOB!!
rjdmmfl1 wrote:regarding "racism" debates, I thin people use the common terms that folks identify themselves as... perhaps you check "other" on the box when you apply for jobs, maybe you don't. But obviously 74% of the folks on the census checked "white" whether they be of Armenian descent like Greg, or French- Italian-German descent, like someone else. Like it or not, whether someone is of Italian-French, or whatever descent, many of them identify themsleves as white, not "other" (although some do ) and so does the U.S. goverment... basicaly, if you pass the white sheet of paper test, regardless of true ethnicity, they view you as white, and you are entitled to the lack of police brutailty and everything else that goes along with that. (I'm not being literal, but hopefully you get the picture)
What choice was there for those 74% to check other than white?
rjdmmfl1 wrote:Lastly, I wil say this about this preferential treatment you seem to be so ticked off about. And again, I'll use my personal example regarding this... I am not particularly in favor of giving anyone with "lesser" qualifications a nod over someone with "greater" qualifications just to lend them a hand. i would have hoped that you had gathered that from my statement of my qualifications as a premed student, as well as the scenario I put forth with all candidates being equal. IMO, allowing a lesser qualified individual to have a job or obtainin a position will ultimately end in failure for both the applicant and the emplyer.
So you want affirmative action to protect black people from statistics? "Oh noes, we might not get selected cause there are less of us!" Why don;t you look at it this way, How many people in your example get the internship? 5%. 75 white guys didn't get that internship either.
rjdmmfl1 wrote:As such, I am NOT in favor of admitting minority students to medical school with lesser stats .. I AM NOT!!! It is indeed not fair!!! however, in the case of having equally qualified applicants, if accepting a minority student at a disproportiante rate of the applicant pool contributes to increasing the diversity of the workforce, then that idea I support. The devil is in the details of any program... and I am a firm believer that diversity does NOT a have to come at the expense of lowered standards.

However, what I am trying to get you, and other opponents of Affirmative Action to understand is that

A. it does NOT always lead to a company or institution accepted "lower qualified" minority students Does this happen Yes, and that is why I am not a blind supporter of all AA programs, but most opponents are blind opponents of al AA programs without examining each one in detail

B. Providing an additional opportunity that would otherwise NOT exist does not take away opportunities for anyone else. On this point, I think we will continue to disagree!
You keep throwing that equally qualified clause in there. Sure, in a perfect world they would be equally qualified, but that is NEVER the case. So then when does this law have a valid use other than your laboratory case?

User avatar
rjdmmfl1
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:52 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe, Radiant Silver, 3.5SE, Premium Package, VDC

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:
So then your example is arbitrary and means nothing. What if 100 applied and 80 were Black, 14 were Asian, 4 were Indian, and 1 was White. Do we need a organization to get the white guy the job?


if it were identified that there was a reason that whites historically were not applying to this position, then yes, absolutely... having a diverse background of individuals in many fields is a GOOD thing, and if you can identify ways to increase the diversity in a paricular field, then yes, that should be done
wheelman wrote: And you fail to answer my point again. WHY DOES THERE NEED TO BE A EQUAL REPRESENTATION IN ALL JOB FIELDS? So what if there are less black people in a job? WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING!! NOTHING OTHER THAN THE COLOR OF THE SKIN OF THE PEOPLE GETTING THE JOB!!
well, I can't argue for all fields, but for medicine in particular, I personally feel it makes a huge diffference. why? well you can ask folks in the black community why they distrust doctors, and they will cite things like the Tuskegee experiment... that experiment has had HUGE ramifications on elderly blacks in the country as to why they choose to avoid doctors unless absolutely necessary. This has in turn led to a culture of people that (EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE) avoid going to the doctor, thus helth concerns are not addresed until later stages of the disease, leading to increased mortality amongst blacks compared to whites that hav the exact same disease.

This is just one example, but the global ramifications of health disparities is well documented, and is one of the main forces driving for the push to get more students of color interested in medicine. Surveys have shown that students of color are more likely to serve their own communities, many of them poor communities, when they become physicians. In essence, there are a number of community based hospitals in poor black communities that close down due to lack of finding physicians and nurses to fill their staffs. Having programs that lead to more qualified black medical school applicants will directly lead to increased black physicians that will go back and serve those communities, not because they are being forced, but because they REALLY WANT TO BE THERE. This improves quality of life for those patients.

For biomedical research, there's an even simpler answer that doesn't require you to be familiar with the history of medicine. Mamy people research things that they are truly passionate about. And many folks fund research for things they are truly passionate about. When some Senator's wife gets cancer, he's now the new "pro cancer research" guy on the hill. When someone's daughter dies of cystic fibrosis, they become the new spokesperson for cystic fibrosis.... and there is nothing wrong with this... however... what about sickle cell disease... do you even know what sickle cell disease is? have you ever heard about it. anyone in your family ever had it? the answer to most if not all of those questions is probably NO! well, here's a few stats on sickle cell disease

1/10 African Americans have the trait (one good gene and one bad gene that causes the disease) and can pass it down to their children

1/500 African Americans have the disease .. that's approximately

The disease triggers horrible pain crisis that is often described as the closest pain to death by sickle cell patients. The crisis can last from a few hours to a few weeks ... this leads to all sorts of socio-economic problems for these individuals and their families.

Now, although this disease was the FIRST disease that we as physicians/scientists understood and characterized at the molecular level, it is one of thes eleast studied disease affrecting a major population.

WHY????

Well its simple, people donate their time and effort to things that they care about, or that affect their families and people that look like them. The fact that you have probably never heard of this horrible disease that affects so many members of the population is a testament to what I'm talking about.

Now to wrap all of this up full circle, I could do pretty much anything I want to do with my degress from Johns Hopkins. But I've chosen to dedicate my career to researching sickle cell disease in hopes of discovering better treatments for these patients, but also treating these patients as a physician (hence the combination of the MD and PhD degrees, and the 19 years of post high school training and studying required to do this)

I am but one example of how creating AA programs leads to EQUALLY qualified candidates that enter medical and graduate school, graduate, and go back to serve the much needed poor black population. If you can't see the importance of that, then I don't know what it would take!

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

So because a handful of racist doctors performed an experiment on a handful of black soldiers, white people can legally be discriminated against?

User avatar
rjdmmfl1
Posts: 5111
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:52 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe, Radiant Silver, 3.5SE, Premium Package, VDC

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:So because a handful of racist doctors performed an experiment on a handful of black soldiers, white people can legally be discriminated against?
If that is all you gathered from that, then this conversation is offcially over... before that comment, I actually still thought you were intelligent... my mistake

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

I was merely addressing the Tuskegee experiment with that comment. I mean honestly, if those people are so ignorant that they will hold the actions of a few against an entire race then f*** em. They can not go to a doctor and die for all I care.

I can understand your point about sickle cell, I don't have anything to say about that. I do know what sickle cell is. I also understand that a lot of black carry the gene because it makes them immune to certain diseases which enabled the trait to spread to it's current concentration. There was a point where it was beneficial, and evolution reflects that.

yelnatsch517
Posts: 2743
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 11:04 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX

Post

AZhitman wrote:I have a better idea -

How about people (ALL people) recognize that:

1) Life ain't fair.2) Some people have to work harder than others.

There's no need for a gov't-sanctioned program to "advance" a certain sub-set of the population.

Would you approve of the NAAWP? Why not? Because we all "have it made"? Really? Drive through rural Arkansas and tell me that.

No - Its time has passed. It's done nothing of consequence for years, and it's a relic of a time when people couldn't "bootstrap" themselves into a better way of life.

Those days are gone. And in the rare cases they're not? Too damn bad.
I can't agree more.

Affirmative action is just plain retarded. Reverse racism is still racism.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

rjdmmfl1 wrote: I am but one example of how creating AA programs leads to EQUALLY qualified candidates that enter medical and graduate school, graduate, and go back to serve the much needed poor black population. If you can't see the importance of that, then I don't know what it would take!
My doctor is Black.

He serves the upper-middle class, predominantly White population of the suburb I reside in.

Next time I'm in for a checkup, I'll ask him why he didn't choose to go back to treat the people in his old neighborhood.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

equality in government experimentation. We've come a long way.http://www.frankolsonproject.o....html

User avatar
Urabus GodofTraction
Posts: 6178
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 4:36 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon
2004 Suzuki SV650
1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
1994 Honda XR600R

Post

rjdmmfl1 wrote:

if it were identified that there was a reason that whites historically were not applying to this position, then yes, absolutely... having a diverse background of individuals in many fields is a GOOD thing, and if you can identify ways to increase the diversity in a paricular field, then yes, that should be done

well, I can't argue for all fields, but for medicine in particular, I personally feel it makes a huge diffference. why? well you can ask folks in the black community why they distrust doctors, and they will cite things like the Tuskegee experiment... that experiment has had HUGE ramifications on elderly blacks in the country as to why they choose to avoid doctors unless absolutely necessary. This has in turn led to a culture of people that (EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE) avoid going to the doctor, thus helth concerns are not addresed until later stages of the disease, leading to increased mortality amongst blacks compared to whites that hav the exact same disease.

This is just one example, but the global ramifications of health disparities is well documented, and is one of the main forces driving for the push to get more students of color interested in medicine. Surveys have shown that students of color are more likely to serve their own communities, many of them poor communities, when they become physicians. In essence, there are a number of community based hospitals in poor black communities that close down due to lack of finding physicians and nurses to fill their staffs. Having programs that lead to more qualified black medical school applicants will directly lead to increased black physicians that will go back and serve those communities, not because they are being forced, but because they REALLY WANT TO BE THERE. This improves quality of life for those patients.

For biomedical research, there's an even simpler answer that doesn't require you to be familiar with the history of medicine. Mamy people research things that they are truly passionate about. And many folks fund research for things they are truly passionate about. When some Senator's wife gets cancer, he's now the new "pro cancer research" guy on the hill. When someone's daughter dies of cystic fibrosis, they become the new spokesperson for cystic fibrosis.... and there is nothing wrong with this... however... what about sickle cell disease... do you even know what sickle cell disease is? have you ever heard about it. anyone in your family ever had it? the answer to most if not all of those questions is probably NO! well, here's a few stats on sickle cell disease

1/10 African Americans have the trait (one good gene and one bad gene that causes the disease) and can pass it down to their children

1/500 African Americans have the disease .. that's approximately

The disease triggers horrible pain crisis that is often described as the closest pain to death by sickle cell patients. The crisis can last from a few hours to a few weeks ... this leads to all sorts of socio-economic problems for these individuals and their families.

Now, although this disease was the FIRST disease that we as physicians/scientists understood and characterized at the molecular level, it is one of thes eleast studied disease affrecting a major population.

WHY????

Well its simple, people donate their time and effort to things that they care about, or that affect their families and people that look like them. The fact that you have probably never heard of this horrible disease that affects so many members of the population is a testament to what I'm talking about.

Now to wrap all of this up full circle, I could do pretty much anything I want to do with my degress from Johns Hopkins. But I've chosen to dedicate my career to researching sickle cell disease in hopes of discovering better treatments for these patients, but also treating these patients as a physician (hence the combination of the MD and PhD degrees, and the 19 years of post high school training and studying required to do this)

I am but one example of how creating AA programs leads to EQUALLY qualified candidates that enter medical and graduate school, graduate, and go back to serve the much needed poor black population. If you can't see the importance of that, then I don't know what it would take!
If you were my doctor I'd be constantly wondering if you took a more qualified Asian's place at John Hopkins.

What happened to letting the cream (of any color) rise to the top?

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

But charlie, you gotta understand - Because of the color of their skin, they just CAN'T get a fair shake... "The Man" is keeping us down!

/sarcasm

+1 for letting the most qualified candidate have the spot. Regardless of their background, race, ethnicity, handicap or privilege.


Return to “Politics Etc.”