yeah i moved the location of a ground because of an observation i noticed in the design of the stock grounds... you can read the thread i believe i explained why i moved it...pfarmer wrote:
Oh you mean the problem two weeks before the post about fixing the car start issue by moving the grounding kit. Also he wasn't alone in moving the suggested location of the grounding kit and said they saw differences.
Perry
I was going to actually start a tread like that had I not got any response....SORRY OP, but this was over-due!!!!awdjdmtalon wrote:Now that we have totally thread jacket this thing. Why don't the mods move this to a stuck topic called........."The Great Ground Wire Kit Debate"
I"M WITH YA!!!! NEW THREAD!!Poyzinous wrote:Now lets stop this bickering and have a beer who's with me! zozo?
Thanks for reitterating this! Oh and Perry, Nissan stacks more than just 2 ring terminals. I've seen up to 4. I believe they use bare copper wire and tin ring terminals which is the opposite of what I use (bare copper terminals and tinned copper wire).awdjdmtalon wrote:Perry.
You said that you should not use crimp on ring connectors or stack grounds. The factory uses both. So how are Ground kits that use the crimp on ring connectors, and stack grounds wrong for doing what the factory does. If that is the case then all the designers and engineers are all wrong by your statement.
Poyzinous wrote:
I LIKE my BEERS!!! I DRINK....ultra....Sentientbydesign wrote:
Richard/Gabriel,
You guys ever drink anything harder? I would much rather a strong "girly drink" than beer
I like beer too. Since I'm a light weight at 155lbs I feel a good buzz after beer 2. It also can't help to be mexican. Our BAC is never below .04 so we always have a head start.... lolThough sometimes I just mix myself a strong, heavy manly margarita on the rox. Jack and coke is ok.SVTCOBRA wrote:
I LIKE my BEERS!!! I DRINK....ultra....
Lets jack this thread and post our favorite mixes! Favorite Beer: Pacifico (basically a smoother Corona) MGD and MGD 64 and Miller lite, Dos XX lager on draft! ooooh man. I love this place.SVTCOBRA wrote:I"M WITH YA!!!! NEW THREAD!!
Actually it makes sense when you see that you have two sets of two. From a grounding standpoint the bottom of the bolt should be close to the same potential as the block. If you add a third conductor into the mix then the center conductor relies on the the other two and inherits any resistance from the ring connector.kmckis1029 wrote:
yeah i moved the location of a ground because of an observation i noticed in the design of the stock grounds... you can read the thread i believe i explained why i moved it...
basically for some reason infiniti splits a single ground wire into two ground wires right before it is bolted to the engine block... since i dont know why they did that and i dont have any manuals to explain why.. i decided to move that particylar ground on nate's kit... thats the only place i saw where infiniti did that while installing nates kit...
but nates kit did not cause any problems for my car even with the ground in the original location, i just noticed improvements... and 4drmaddness has so many mods on his car... its just not logical to isolate the grounding kit as the cause of his car not starting...
Ideally you should use pressure welded connectors and yes you should not use a stack. The only stacks I can find on my system is a stack of two, I see no place where there is greater than this on any type of chassis ground.awdjdmtalon wrote:Perry.
You said that you should not use crimp on ring connectors or stack grounds. The factory uses both. So how are Ground kits that use the crimp on ring connectors, and stack grounds wrong for doing what the factory does. If that is the case then all the designers and engineers are all wrong by your statement.
I see no locations on my car where this is done. I do see where they use two in a stack. Where do you see four?Sentientbydesign wrote:
Thanks for reitterating this! Oh and Perry, Nissan stacks more than just 2 ring terminals. I've seen up to 4. I believe they use bare copper wire and tin ring terminals which is the opposite of what I use (bare copper terminals and tinned copper wire).
Richard/Gabriel,
You guys ever drink anything harder? I would much rather a strong "girly drink" than beer
As far as not removing the grounding kit the grounding kit is in parallel with the factory grounds, remember what the formula is for parallel resistance.awdjdmtalon wrote:
No need to remove the ground kit. It only uses 2 factory ground points, as I indicated by the (F) next to the measurments. And when I measured those ground points, I measured on the factory wire ring and then on the SBD kit wire ring.
Yes a SHORT can cause high resistance. As well can it can cause an open circuit. You should know that w/ your "35 years in an industry that relies on proper grounding techniques for controls."
And .2 ohms of resistance is nominal. I'm sure that the .2 ohms on the stacked grounds could be lowered to .1ohms if spread out as sigle ground points. But I do not see the need for that.
Go back to where I talked about, " You can take a single strand out of either ground wire you want an measure its resistance and get .1 ohms. But that single strand of wire CAN NOT carry the current or load that the entire bundle of wires can carry. "
If I remember correctly yours is an 07. Did you replace the negative battery lead or connect another lead from the battery to ground?suby01 wrote:http://forums.g35club.org/zerothread/445179
Now, I tried the MGD 64 when it first came out and it tasted like a tin can compared to my 'girlie' Ultra! Also, it has less cal/carbs cause it has less alcohol than Ultra. I did used to like me some miller light draft (in a pitcher) when we used to do the midnight bowling with the lane lights off.Poyzinous wrote:Favorite Beer: Pacifico (basically a smoother Corona) MGD and MGD 64 and Miller lite, Dos XX lager on draft! ooooh man. I love this place.
Normally this is the case, but look at plenum spacers and how much of a difference they make. Obivously the engineers haven't made everything "perfect" on these cars.pfarmer wrote:
In the case of bang for the buck, if a 100 dollar ( at the consumer end) part would produce more horsepower then it may well be accepted, especially for a required part in the first place as it will sell more cars.
Perry
While the plenum spacers gives you a benefit there may well have been a good reason for going with what they did which you will probably never know. It may have been that the increase horse power doesn't outweigh whatever they came across in such a way to affect sales. An example of this is the reported $5 upgrade to the original Mustang (as demo) structure would not offset with increased sales the Mustang they finally went with which was too bad.tollboothwilley wrote:
Normally this is the case, but look at plenum spacers and how much of a difference they make. Obivously the engineers haven't made everything "perfect" on these cars.
The grounding system can def. be upgraded in the 2003-2006 models.
Makes a difference on more than just the 03-06. The 07 coupe is the same platform as the 03-06 and there are plenty of 07/08 G35 sedans that can benefit as well.tollboothwilley wrote:
Normally this is the case, but look at plenum spacers and how much of a difference they make. Obivously the engineers haven't made everything "perfect" on these cars.
The grounding system can def. be upgraded in the 2003-2006 models.
Here we go with the devil's advocate again. The likely reason for the sloping upper plenum is so that the 350Z can have it's "unnecessary" shock tower bar. If you notice, that's where the bar crosses over the plenum.pfarmer wrote:
While the plenum spacers gives you a benefit there may well have been a good reason for going with what they did which you will probably never know. It may have been that the increase horse power doesn't outweigh whatever they came across in such a way to affect sales. An example of this is the reported $5 upgrade to the original Mustang (as demo) structure would not offset with increased sales the Mustang they finally went with which was too bad.
And you are correct on an older car replacing or fixing your stock grounds will definately be a worthwhile upgrade.
Perry
Scientific verified evidence?Sentientbydesign wrote:
Makes a difference on more than just the 03-06. The 07 coupe is the same platform as the 03-06 and there are plenty of 07/08 G35 sedans that can benefit as well.
Here we go with the devil's advocate again. The likely reason for the sloping upper plenum is so that the 350Z can have it's "unnecessary" shock tower bar. If you notice, that's where the bar crosses over the plenum.
It's obvious that they didn't do a great job on that intake as the VQ35HR has a completely revised thermo polymer plenum with symetrical intakes.