I think Wes meant it is a stretch to fit tires that wide on such a narrow wheel. Remember, this all depends on the aspect ratio of the tire. The shorter the shoulder relative to its cross section (the aspect ratio), the rim width should be a higher percentage of the tire's cross section.elwesso wrote:Brian is right.... At widest what I would run on there is a 245... Ive seen 245s on a 7.5 in wheel, a little stretched but not bad......
Boy, would it ever. Not safe at any speed!Falkdesigns wrote:Right, so that's not stretched then. Stretched in tire terms is when the tire is physically stretching to fit on the rim. IE: a 215 on a 10" wide wheel would be "stretched".
Yep... And with the 245s on a 7.5, thats about as far as id want to go and still feel comfortable......maxnix wrote:I think Wes meant it is a stretch to fit tires that wide on such a narrow wheel. Remember, this all depends on the aspect ratio of the tire. The shorter the shoulder relative to its cross section (the aspect ratio), the rim width should be a higher percentage of the tire's cross section.
In any case, actually stretching a tire by mounting it on a wider rim than the cross section is not how the engineers designed the tires. It is right there with the hooptie wheels and the guys that like to run on space savers.
245 is the factory tire size for nissan's 7.5 inch wheel-equipped cars. It is definitely too wide, though, by my standards. 225 would be much better.elwesso wrote:Yep... And with the 245s on a 7.5, thats about as far as id want to go and still feel comfortable......
I totally agree.MinisterofDOOM wrote:245 is the factory tire size for nissan's 7.5 inch wheel-equipped cars. It is definitely too wide, though, by my standards. 225 would be much better.
Yeah, some dumb compromises are done by OEM to save an ounce where they shouldn't, but then consumers are always shopping price point and won't pay for the higher cost materials to save weight but maintain strength.MinisterofDOOM wrote:245 is the factory tire size for nissan's 7.5 inch wheel-equipped cars. It is definitely too wide, though, by my standards. 225 would be much better.
oh jesus. a 215 can be barely stretched on a 10"maxnix wrote:Boy, would it ever. Not safe at any speed!
Haven't seen a hooptie blow out yet either, but I sure do pass them quickly becasue I don't want to be behind them when it happens. Isn't tempting fate fun?Louis Cyphier wrote:
oh jesus. a 215 can be barely stretched on a 10"
Im running 215/45/17 on 9.5" and i've run a 235/40/17 on 10" neither were stretched how i woulda liked to see them
I've run stretched tires for years and had no one single blow-out ever.
Believe me , Ive had to make sudden lane changes @75-80 mph (these damn phoenix drivers )No problems stoping either.Turn in response is great, I would never go back to stock sizes ( or close ) with so much sidewall that you turn the wheel and it takes a while for the car to respond.With this set up the car feels like its on rails.Still got Cusco coils and JIC sus.parts sitting in the garage waiting to install.AZhitman wrote:
VIP, love the car, looks hot... but I'd hate to make an emergency stop or an 80mph sudden lane change in that car (especially on 170-degree asphalt).
None taken .elwesso wrote:it probably feels like your on rails because the wheel is hitting the ground.....
Just kidding... no offence, just not my style!
I hear what you are saying.But , then again I think people driving with under inflated tires are more at risk. My 2 cents.AZhitman wrote:I'm just saying you've been fortunate thus far...
Just because nothing bad has happened doesn't mean it's not VERY likely that it will.
Regardless, it looks kickass.
BTW, my 255/40ZR18 P-Zeros feel damn snug too. Sidewalls on these are solid as hell.
So solid that NICOmom drove on one with a 3" gash in the sidewall 6 miles home - no rim damage.
Need to look a little harderFalkdesigns wrote: Just looks weird seeing so much rubber to me, never seen that look in any VIP mags, unless like I said, you did a wide-body.
But then again, having personally been twice to Japan, and having dozens of VIP and EXE magazines in my collection, I have absolutely no clue what this "VIP" thing is *heavy sarcasm*
Hey Falk, was that a photo of your rear wheel or the front?Falkdesigns wrote:These are my current wheels, 19x8 +20 & 19x9.5 +20. Like Brian's new OZ's, these took amazingly little to balance.
Too narrow is debatable, stocker are only 6.5" wide and stock tire is only 215 width. You could easily install a 235 or 245 on them which in my opinion is plenty wide. I personally don't like the "stretched" look of putting narrow rubber on wide rims. I like them to look more "meaty".maxnix wrote:The reason they are on close out is they are too narrow for a tire of the necessary width to carry the Q45.
What is their weight? What is their load capacity? Two of the most important specifications to consider!
Those ICW Acclaims are 22 lbs. ea. What's a decent weight to look for? I found a photo of a car with those wheels on Cardomain.com. It's a Lexus but it gives you an idea of what they look like on a 4 door vehicle. I like them personally. Can't decide if I like the gunmetal gray or silver.maxnix wrote:............What is their weight? What is their load capacity? Two of the most important specifications to consider!