i know it might not be your cup of tea, but i would *love* an XLR with an LS7...what does the XLR-V have? LS6 or something?Jesda wrote:You can get the Northstar in RWD form with an STS, SRX, or XLR.
i know it might not be your cup of tea, but i would *love* an XLR with an LS7...what does the XLR-V have? LS6 or something?Jesda wrote:You can get the Northstar in RWD form with an STS, SRX, or XLR.
The G50 has a longer wheelbase and is also longer from bumper to bumper, but the Y33 has packaging that makes the back seat and trunk bigger.nismofly wrote:
y33's bigger, by far
its the main reason i prefer the g50, i prefer smaller, sleeker cars...the y33 is the size of a maybach
my neighbor has a g50 so i know how big they are, i can just remember the first time i saw a y33, i didnt know wtf it was even though id seen pictures, then i saw the infiniti badge and it all came together, i couldnt believe it
yes your correct.. overall length and wheelbase is very close, the G50 wheel base is slightly longer...nismofly wrote:odd, i just looked up the lengths and it says theyre the same size, within 2 tenths of an inch to be exact
well, the y33 LOOKS a lot larger
it has the supercharged northstar.nismofly wrote:i know it might not be your cup of tea, but i would *love* an XLR with an LS7...what does the XLR-V have? LS6 or something?
Supercharged Northstarnismofly wrote:what does the XLR-V have?
ok, then it just LOOKS a lot longer, like i said compared to my neighbors g50 i couldnt believe what the difference when i realized what it waselwesso wrote:yes your correct.. overall length and wheelbase is very close, the G50 wheel base is slightly longer...
ok then, LS7 it is!elwesso wrote:it has the supercharged northstar.
I wonder where that all went on the G50 because the Y33 has a bigger trunk and slightly more leg room......nismofly wrote:ok, then it just LOOKS a lot longer, like i said compared to my neighbors g50 i couldnt believe what the difference when i realized what it was
Actually, the FY33 trunk is about 4 inches less deep than the G50 trunk. Don't think the back seat is any larger either, but I never ride there in either one.Jesda wrote:The G50 has a longer wheelbase and is also longer from bumper to bumper, but the Y33 has packaging that makes the back seat and trunk bigger.
An important point. I like the early G50, but would not give up the comfort and convenience items in the later ones, especially including the passenger airbag, remote entry, autodimming rear view mirror, reversing mirrors, R134a, pillar tweeters, thicker glass, etc.BadQ45t wrote:I feel that the 92 was not a comparable car to the 97, the 97 is much more of a luxury car than the 92' was and is an upgrade (better seats, center console, multi-CD and way better stereo, much better ride). I think the 94 were big improvement.
I knew from the moment I read the title that would be the case. He and others would be all in here going on about how's it's not an upgrade, blah, blah, blah. IMO, a NEWER, car, the same model - wether some will accept that fact or not - higher safety equipment level, more refined, quieter, roomier, is ALWAYS an upgrade.Rex wrote:Another Y33 thread run awry by Wes .
Both were sold alongside each other in the SAME class of cars.sijoko wrote:How can the Y33 be a successor to the G50 when they were both sold at the same time in Japan?
What was the Y33 replaced with? It was known as the M45 in the States.
'nuf said!sijoko wrote:
Bottom line was cost. They didn't even put a 4.5 liter engine in it because of the expense, yet called it a Q45.
The Y33 is a good car but it is not the true successor to the Q45 title. I think that the only car that comes close to the original Q45 in performance and style is the new M45.
Good example - The NSX can't be substituted for, and isn't an upgrade to a G50 any more than a Y33 is - the 3 cars appeal to drivers for different reasons.DuDro wrote:I LOVE my F50, but here is where my heart really is...
I will be getting another one when I move back to the West Coast!
Call me a sell outelwesso wrote:The deal is Kev is that your not gonna convince me or any other G50 owner that a Y33 is an upgrade. Likewise, we will not going to be able to convince you that a G50 is a better car than a Y33. We're so damn set in our ways that its not really a point in arguing it.....
I think sijoko is right though... I dont know the price differences for say the 1997 G50 president and the 1997 Cima, maybe theyre similar, but the president was a pretty expensive car in japan.....
DuDro is right... Youll have to decide which one you like the best... bottom line is, while some dont like the styling as much, the F50 wins. I personally like the F50 styling.
That looks familiar.Rex wrote: