dreamsOfSkylines wrote: the only way to make your control arms parallel with the ground again is by moving the control arm mounting points up (which would require some cutting/welding in the front and a custom rear subframe).
daniel wrote:i only post here cuz anand asked me toyou guys seriously need to get a clue
Ohlins doesnt even redo their damper for you unless you are a race team..
Cyberkreig wrote:You would be right about the geometry thing, right up until you said this.
This is just flat out wrong. Wrong wrong and more wrong. IN the case of an S13, there is no such thing as a front upper control arm. Adjusting the camber via camber plates fixes any geometry problems. As for the rear, Project silvia sells Rear upper control arms with off center bolt holes. This puts the arm back in parallel with the ground. Problem solved.
For reference, here are the arms. http://www.projectnissan.com/P...t=609 These appear to be revised since I purchased them, but its easy to see that someone could weld on plates and drill new holes.
daniel wrote:attitude is because i am telling you guys the truthand the best way to go at a situation
from experiencenot intarweb experiencebut cut knuckle experience
and you guys are like wtf mate..you're wrong.
when in fact i am not.
its pretty annoying.
exactly :withstupCyberkreig wrote:You would be right about the geometry thing, right up until you said this.
This is just flat out wrong. Wrong wrong and more wrong. IN the case of an S13, there is no such thing as a front upper control arm. Adjusting the camber via camber plates fixes any geometry problems. As for the rear, Project silvia sells Rear upper control arms with off center bolt holes. This puts the arm back in parallel with the ground. Problem solved.
For reference, here are the arms. http://www.projectnissan.com/P...t=609 These appear to be revised since I purchased them, but its easy to see that someone could weld on plates and drill new holes.
If you lower the rear, you must lower the front to some percentage, you will find this when you go to counterweight the vehicle. When you are lowering the front (which is a macpherson strut design) you will be increasing roll couple and lowering the roll center of the car faster than the COG. This requires less static negative camber (which the camber plates can afford), and a higher spring rate (which the HE's afford). However now you have effectively lowered the car too much for the spring rate to be at it's most effective (so you order HE's with 10 / 8 spring rates). Now you have a problem if you put Hoosier slicks on the car, because you now have to create camber in order for the tire to be at it's most stable. Well since you have little suspension travel you have to make it 2.5 - 3.0 static negative. Which reduces not only your lower speed handling ability but the car's braking and accelerating ability. So you go out and buy front lower control arms to help reduce the amount of roll couple. Now you have less pitch in the car and the spring rate is too high so the car skates or understeers.daniel wrote:dude...d2 coilover is good for the front like i've said
BUT YOU CANNOT SLAM THE REAR ENOUGH
the front is good...but you just cant get a good ride height so you drive sloppy with them...
as for the GB
get the GB then i'll get you the price..maybe i can swing 1075 or something..nothing for sure till you got 10
The only person that can tell you the answer to your first question is you.IWannaS15 wrote:Can we get back to the coilover comparison??I'm trying to decide if I really need coilovers in the first place. The comments about shocks wearing out when used with lowering springs kinda leads me back to coilovers. I could care less about eliminating wheel gap, I just want better handling.Is 8/6 or even 9/7 the stiffest you would use on a daily driven street car??
daniel wrote:dudewhoever told you JIC is rebuilt in japan
haha
wow
just send them to Ziel they will rebuild them.also
I would get dampers in this order if i was on a budget starting from low to high (i have ridden these)
1. D2 (good if you HAVE to have something)2. Silk Road RM/A83. Buddy Club 4. JIC FLTA2(RS) - larger piston and shorter stroke shock body5. Cusco 02R
Cyberkreig wrote:Thats right, No company in the world rebuilds dampeners to suit a custom ordered spring rate. They dont adjust the piston rate, the bound or the rebound.
daniel wrote:Maine-
I would arguethat this guy should save his money and not get full on coilovers. if he wont use all the features why have theM?
jdmfreak03 wrote:"modify the shock spring perches to accomodate the springs"
What do you mean by this. Ive never heard of this before.
daniel wrote:attitude is because i am telling you guys the truthand the best way to go at a situation
from experiencenot intarweb experiencebut cut knuckle experience
and you guys are like wtf mate..you're wrong.
when in fact i am not.
its pretty annoying.
chances are you'll have to get new rims/tires. I have the stock SE rims w/ 2o5/5o/r15's and ill need atleast a 5mm spacer to clear coulovers. I'll probably just get 8mm spacers and longer wheelstuds (which all together is about another $175-22o)240sxHitman wrote:also when i get coilovers will they clear my stock tires or will spacers be needed, even tho i would get new rims and tires eventually