
Wong is Wong
Cool story.IBCoupe wrote:The implied suggestion is that the opinions of roughly half the population matters because we're in a system where government is supposed to abide by the opinion of the population. Crypt's point was that taking half the opinion as the whole of the opinion is stupid
NAILED itJesda wrote:For the loosely interested public that makes up the bulk of moderate non-ideological voters, perceived popularity is sadly a way of winning elections. Act like a winner, run more ads, put up more signs, spend more money, and you'll seem more legit.
Its effective. Its wrong.
My theory exactlythemadscientist wrote:It's a Republican lie, don't beleive it!
But I'm not seeing the logical fallacy in Crypt's post.Jesda wrote:And that's the point I was making, sweet potato.
I've worked in elections, and not just my own. For the loosely interested public that makes up the bulk of moderate non-ideological voters, perceived popularity is sadly a way of winning elections. Act like a winner, run more ads, put up more signs, spend more money, and you'll seem more legit.
Its effective. Its wrong.
Oh for f***'s sake, dude. You're like the PMQ of politics.IBCoupe wrote:But I'm not seeing the logical fallacy in Crypt's post.Jesda wrote:And that's the point I was making, sweet potato.
I've worked in elections, and not just my own. For the loosely interested public that makes up the bulk of moderate non-ideological voters, perceived popularity is sadly a way of winning elections. Act like a winner, run more ads, put up more signs, spend more money, and you'll seem more legit.
Its effective. Its wrong.