Post by
VimyJ »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/vimyj-u238.html
Wed Mar 05, 2003 9:54 am
Well. It's a good thing I listen to right wing radio. I've heard everything mss has listed.
Quote » Originally posted by msscomm 10,000 liters of Anthrax ! ! !
Iraq ADMITTED they had PRODUCED at LEAST that quantity of something as vile as this toxin - when will it end up in another wackos’ hands ? And delivered here ? Are Anti-war proselytizers DEMANDING Iraq admit its own words, AGAIN, and show where the current stock of Tens of THOUSANDS OF LITERS of weapons are ?[/quote]I believe Iraq's words are that they destroyed it right after the Gulf War. If they didn't destroy it, then the inspectors should be given time to discover it. So far there is no evidence of WMD's. We do not know if he has them. There is no evidence. None. Quote »First - I have served and anyone who has, can regard the loss of life as atrocious - newly made friends, comrades, fellow men and women serving - any of "ours" vs "them in the midst of a firefight - it SUCKS and no sane person should look forward to war - [/quote]You would never get an argument from me on that.
Quote »IMHO, while we don’t ask for war - it HAS been brought to our shores - by the very likes of the Iraqi madman and similar fanatics - and are we to sit here and turn the other cheek ?[/quote]War has been brought to the US by radical Muslim extremists. Saddam is not religeous. He is the leader of the Ba'ath party. Bin Laden is only a little less dangerous to Saddam than he is to the US. Iraq is a secular "apostate" state. After the radicals bring the "Great Satan' to its knees the "little Satans" will be dealt with.
"Turn the other cheek"? Yes, if you are Christian.
Quote »Wether you voted for W or not, he MUST act like an adult and adjudicate in the best interest of our country - [/quote]We can only hope.
Quote »Advocate for disarmament from Iraq - don’t think you are infantile enough to tie one hand behind the US’s back - not 12 more years of funfilled inspections -[/quote]The inspections are unfulfilled. That's good news. If Iraq doesn't have WMD's then how can they be found? I don't trust the guy, though, so I think the UN should send in 5,000 more inspectors and just keep poking around forever. It's been 12 years so what's another couple of months for these "pushovers"? One good kick to the nuts and Saddam is history. No doubt about it. So why the rush? Hmmm.... election coming?
Quote » Do you recall a prior “cowboy” standing up as a parental figure and facing down Communism, repression and simpering sycophants yammering for appeasement ?[/quote]
I remember a rickety Reagan running up the national debt to prod the Soviet house of cards. The Soviet Union was already falling apart before Raygun. I see W bankrupting the federal government, plunging the nation into hugh dept and slashing away at federal responsibilities. I.E. Who needs an expensive National Weather Service when the "Weather Channel" could do it? Yosemite could be worth hundred's of millions to the right developer. $50 a head for a public museum shouldn't be out of the question. Religious education for all.
Quote » I recall all too vividly the idealism of “staying out of it”in Europe[/quote]Like Staying out of WW II while the Bush family made fortunes off of playing one side over the other or letting Yugoslavia fester for 10 years before getting involved though the right kicked and screamed under Clinton?
Quote » yet, we ALREADY KNOW of Saddams atrocities and lies - let’s placate him like Hitler - THAT is what rabid anti-American protests are proponents of.[/quote]This is the most specious argument there is. Like Hitler? The guy is totallly contained. There is no evidence that he has any ties to Bin Laden or Al Qaeda. There is a CIA report that came out today that says terrorists groups might surface after Saddam is gone. DUH!!! Still no proof even from the prisoners in Cuba. None. The 9/11 atrocity was committed on the whole by citizens of the great US ally Saudi Arabia not Iraq.
Quote »If called - would YOU join our MEN and WOMEN who PROTECT ideals ?[/quote]To fight for the ideals of the US constitution and the freedom of the free world, yes. However, W & Co. have other intentions. Self defence? Yeah, right. Oil and power? Seems more profitable. The only profit oil man W ever made was selling a baseball team. He lost on all the oil deals his daddy staked him too. He even lost the democratic election! Would you invest money in a guy with a track record like that? He's a longshot at best.
He even went AWOL from his Guard unit and his daddy made it "go away". Guess he thought the ideals of the US weren't threatened by the N. Vietnamese, either.
Quote »If not, please move to Iraq as a human shield - (I hear they can’t wait to get out as Saddam is putting them in front of Military bases, NOT the civilian spots they bleated they wanted to go protect) - Hmmmmm, reality, WHAT A CONCEPT ![/quote]I couldn't care less about human shields. Saddam can stick them up his a$$. I don't give a flying f--K.
Satisfied guys? You tell him that I think WW III between East and West is inevitable. I just don't trust W because of the pack of half truths he keeps insisting is the whole truth.