CONFIRMED - Next-gen Z gets turbo 4-cylinder

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Image

Reliable word out of Nissan has it that the next-gen 370Z is going to be powered by a turbocharged 4, in an effort to make the Z "leaner", in weight, price and efficiency.

What does this mean for the Z-car in terms of its status as one of the world's premier affordable true sports cars?

And, more importantly, what will it be called?

I'll go on record right now: Call it simply, "the Nissan Z."


User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

3.0 four would be a whole different kind of four.

RBishop85
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:08 pm
Car: '96 Nissan 240sx SE

Post

IMO Rather than worrying about how to shrink the Z Nissan should just bring back the S-chassis... but that's just my opinion =D

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

themadscientist wrote:3.0 four would be a whole different kind of four.
Yeah, that won't happen.

Any speculation on which current-generation four they could boost, and make the kind of power the Z will need to remain competitive?

User avatar
IanS
Posts: 9758
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:07 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX, 2010 Subaru Forester XT, 2004 Infiniti G35 Coupe.
Location: Esko, MN
Contact:

Post

I are disappoint.

At least at this moment. I don't understand why they need to undo 40 some years of tradition. The Z is and always has been a 6 cylinder. Personally, I would like to see a smaller displacement 6, V or straight.

Nissan already had a small 4 cylinder sporty car. It was lean, and it sold very well. Why not bring back an S to compete with the 86/BRZ. Then try to push the Z a little closer to corvette territory. There is a HUGE gap between the Z and the GT-R. Why make it wider?

User avatar
leesredgt
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 1992 Toyota MR2 N/A
1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo

Post

Im with Ian on this. The Z has always been some form of a six cylinder engine. Just for tradition alone it should stay that way.

Whatever. :tisk:

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

<sigh> All I can say is that Nissan better do it better than they have ever done anything before. I am a traditionalist. The Z should always have a 6 IMO. However, I'll drive it before I pass judgment on it. They better do some redesign on the front end though. If not, that engine bay is gonna look awfully empty.

supergoji
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:55 am
Car: 1990 300zx TT #850 R.I.P
1994 300zx TT 2+2 swap
Contact:

Post

All I have to say to that load of s*** is..


WHAT THE f*** NISSAN?!?!!?!??!

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

By the way, it will debut at one of the major auto shows in 2014.

Expect comparable power and performance to the current 370Z (0-60in just under 6 seconds), but emissions and fuel consumption will be significantly improved.

I'm not seeing a downside. Lighter, leaner, faster, cleaner, cheaper - and whatcha know about turning up the boost? :)

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

AZhitman wrote:
themadscientist wrote:3.0 four would be a whole different kind of four.
Yeah, that won't happen.

Any speculation on which current-generation four they could boost, and make the kind of power the Z will need to remain competitive?
Image

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 5993
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

I just got happy in the pants. Thanks to Greg or Becky on posting this on Facebook.

Maybe the smaller engine might bring a lower price tag too, something that has made 370Z less popular and less modder friendly than the 350Z. Scale the weight back to sub-3200lb territory and push out 300+ hp and now we're talking.

Essentially...I want a RWD, Nissan built, EVO :)

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

Here's my only requirement.

NO CVT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


If they do, I'm buying a Genesis and starting a Hyundai forum. :squint:

User avatar
leesredgt
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 1992 Toyota MR2 N/A
1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo

Post

AZhitman wrote:
I'm not seeing a downside. Lighter, leaner, faster, cleaner, cheaper - and whatcha know about turning up the boost? :)

While I do agree with all this and it is an improvement, in my opinion it just wont be the same. Why not just bring back the 240sx name plate for it since everyone seems to want to see it make a comeback.

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

Interesting.
I wonder what motor they'll use.

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

WHAT?!!!

A four cyl? SERIOUSLY? I don't care if it makes 750 to the wheels, a four cylinder does not belong in a Z!

It's the same as if Ford discontinued putting V8s in their Mustangs.

Just imagine a 4 cylinder Z with an aftermarket exhaust.. That would sound horrible.

Akio Asakura would be choked.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

I was going to write a response, but I suspected I had already done that before. I believe in recycling!
themadscientist wrote:
jsturges18 wrote:that would ruin the z. its been a 6 cylinder its whole life and the fact that they would put a german pos engine into it :wtf2:
ORLY?

Image
Image
As for the sound. It will probably sound like this.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GNJSFW5DTc[/youtube]

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

I willing to reserve judgement until I drive one. But I agree with Bex, If they make a CVT standard, that thud you hear will be me jumping off the Nissan bandwagon.

User avatar
eds13
Posts: 5487
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:27 am
Car: 89 240sx Hatch, 07 Armada LE, 91 Skyline GTR
Location: Central VA

Post

nissan is trippin their balls off right now. i just dont understand how their going to "cheapen" down the current Z that much to keep it competitive with the genises, the brz and the frs...

User avatar
BigNateLvHc
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:36 am
Car: 2013 Ram 1500
1995 Nissan 240sx
1996 Nissan 240sx
2007 Ford Fusion
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Post


User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Thats s***. As efficient as it may be, I don't like it. I grew up with all the VG powered Z's, so when I think Z, I automatically think 6 cyl. Oh well. I guess we can safely assume that theres no brz competitor? I wonder what this will do to the price of the Z

nissangirl74 wrote: They better do some redesign on the front end though. If not, that engine bay is gonna look awfully empty.
SHHHHH!!! Next thing you know it'll have the front end from a murano! It won't look that empty, check out the engine bay of the genesis with the turbo 4:
Image

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

I love turbo 4s (I drive an old one daily) but part of the appeal of owning a Z is the way Nissan's V6 engines sound and feel. I would have hoped for a turbo V6.

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

I called this. If I was on a laptop, I'd pull the post up.

Now that I think about it though, I would really like to see a turbo I6. That would be really cool to me.

User avatar
MuranoDriver
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:29 pm
Car: 2007 Nissan Murano SL

Post

FlatBlackIan wrote:I are disappoint.

At least at this moment. I don't understand why they need to undo 40 some years of tradition. The Z is and always has been a 6 cylinder. Personally, I would like to see a smaller displacement 6, V or straight.

Nissan already had a small 4 cylinder sporty car. It was lean, and it sold very well. Why not bring back an S to compete with the 86/BRZ. Then try to push the Z a little closer to corvette territory. There is a HUGE gap between the Z and the GT-R. Why make it wider?
This exactly!

Keep the Z as a 6 and make a smaller version with a turbo 4.

User avatar
Loki
Posts: 7653
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:27 am
Car: 1994 Nissan 240SX Convertible
2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
Location: Detroit, MI
Contact:

Post

I don't really see the point of dropping to a 4-cylinder. I can understand dropping the displacement in favor of a turbo and engine management, but why shave off two cylinders? Would a 2.5l 4 cylinder be more efficient than a 2.5l 6 cylinder?

User avatar
Rev_D21
Posts: 5946
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2003 9:49 pm
Car: 1986.5 D21 LB HD 2WD V6 5Speed
1991 D21 Reg 2WD Auto
1995 D21 Reg 2WD 5Spd
1996 D21 Reg 4WD 5Spd
2012 Versa 1.6S 5-Speed
Location: Somwhere in Western NY
Contact:

Post

It doesn't matter what Nissan does from here on out...they are dead to me.

User avatar
RicerX
Moderator
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:36 am
Car: '20 Titan Pro4X
Location: Southeastern US

Post

I'm absolutely dumbfounded.

IMHO - you have a few applications where a turbo-4 works in today's "performance" car market. Evo/STi are given. Take it down a notch and you have the Mazdaspeed3, base WRX, and GTi.

The 370Z is in between the Evo/STi and say the newer pony cars in the Mustang GT (5.0) and Camaro SS... all those cars line up nicely. The Z just needs a bit of a push forward in power to be a true competitor there.

Why is Nissan SO AFRAID of anything that doesn't have an electric motor or a crossover with a CVT attached to it?

Instead of filling the gap as someone said above and pushing the Z closer to the V8 sports car area (where it BELONGS - the Z is the ONLY true two seat sports car under $100K besides the Corvette and to a much lesser extent, Miata), they're pushing the Z closer to a Mazdaspeed3/GTI/BRZ/FRS - a class of vehicle it has NEVER participated in.

They're not going to make a 300hp turbo 4 cylinder. I just don't see it. They never have before. Subaru and Mitsu have been working on the WRX/Evo platforms for DECADES now and are just getting to touch 300hp levels.

I want to be wrong. I really do. But in light of the GT-R possibly being killed off and this talk of the Z, I am losing faith in Nissan to continue its tradition of producing exciting, innovative vehicles. If they decide to "settle" for the FRS market by sacrificing the prestige of the Z car, in my eyes, they will have officially joined ranks with Honda and Toyota - completely unexciting car makers that are exceptionally proficient at manufacturing vehicles that do no more than privatize the functionality of public transportation. Maybe that's what they have wanted to do for a long time now.

I hope Nissan is truly hiding an ace up their sleeve. I don't want to buy a Mustang. Or a Hyundai Genesis Coupe with a V8 in it. But I will if they fail to meet expectations. Or just forever hold on to the last of the Mohicans in my 40th 370Z.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

AZhitman wrote:
Expect comparable power
Get real, Greg. The VQ37 is powerful by even v6 standards. So much so that the competition needs boost in THEIR V6s to compete. There is no way in HELL any Nissan 4 is going to come close, regardless of boost. The closest thing they've got is the Juke powerplant and all the boost on earth won't make 330hp out of that thing in a street car.

I'll concede that modern boosted fours are getting impressive. But they are NOT comparable to the best of the best of their V6 brethren.

User avatar
AZ89two4Tsx
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:02 am

Post

Sure Nissan. Make your Altima nice enough to compete with the Maxima, yet downgrade your "iconic" 6-cylinder sports car to a four banger that shouldn't even be called a Z.

Whatever though. Honestly, I won't see it till I believe it. I really hope the head dudes at Nissan aren't that ignorant. Only time I will tell....

User avatar
leesredgt
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 1992 Toyota MR2 N/A
1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo

Post

AZ89two4Tsx wrote: I really hope the head dudes at Nissan aren't that ignorant.

Need I say more....


Image

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

For the love of MR. K

Why Nissan, WHY!?!?


Return to “General Chat”