CONFIRMED - Next-gen Z gets turbo 4-cylinder

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

FlatBlackIan wrote:I are disappoint.

At least at this moment. I don't understand why they need to undo 40 some years of tradition. The Z is and always has been a 6 cylinder. Personally, I would like to see a smaller displacement 6, V or straight.

Nissan already had a small 4 cylinder sporty car. It was lean, and it sold very well. Why not bring back an S to compete with the 86/BRZ. Then try to push the Z a little closer to corvette territory. There is a HUGE gap between the Z and the GT-R. Why make it wider?
THIS THIS THIS THIS!!! These are the exact words I was going to say.

Gah I'm so pissed off. Does Nissan really not know what their enthuisiasts want?

:mad:


User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

No. More to the point, I don't think they care. They will get their sales numbers, but not from enthusiasts. Face it folks, manufacturers don't give a s*** what you want. They are watching pie charts and profitability reports and the "enthusiast" is a vocal minority in today's market. Most people are boring, unimaginative, lazy and fickle and the car makers are simply catering to them. Good for them, bad for those of us who view a car as more than basic transportation or an accessory to show off like a new iPad.

For every one of us who wash our hands of the idea of buying a new car with no soul, there are three zombies lined up who want to buy the car with "all those cupholders!" It's the way it is, give up.

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

Possibly the sad truth. ^

:(

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

eds13 wrote:i just dont understand how their going to "cheapen" down the current Z that much to keep it competitive with the genises, the brz and the frs...
Actually, at the hp and weight numbers they're currently talking about, it should soundly whip the BRZ, FR-S and Genesis Coupe in almost all categories.

None of those cars is fast.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:Get real, Greg. The VQ37 is powerful by even v6 standards. So much so that the competition needs boost in THEIR V6s to compete. There is no way in HELL any Nissan 4 is going to come close, regardless of boost. The closest thing they've got is the Juke powerplant and all the boost on earth won't make 330hp out of that thing in a street car.

I'll concede that modern boosted fours are getting impressive. But they are NOT comparable to the best of the best of their V6 brethren.
I don't disagree with the first part, but weight reduction appears to be a pretty integral part of this plan.

If you'll look back, I drove the pre-production 370Z extensively. My biggest complaint was that it's heavy, and a mite ponderous... More of a GT car than a true sports car. If they can shave off 300-500 lbs and keep power levels similar, performance should remain comparable.

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

AZhitman wrote:
eds13 wrote:i just dont understand how their going to "cheapen" down the current Z that much to keep it competitive with the genises, the brz and the frs...
Actually, at the hp and weight numbers they're currently talking about, it should soundly whip the BRZ, FR-S and Genesis Coupe in almost all categories.

None of those cars is fast.
Except the traditional rival for the Z was the other makers' high rank cars like the Supra, not middle rank cars like the hachiroku. That's like saying "the Supra could easily beat the Silvia." It's supposed to, it's a higher level car!

They are downgrading the car. It's a BS move any way you slice it.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

AZhitman wrote:If you'll look back, I drove the pre-production 370Z extensively. My biggest complaint was that it's heavy, and a mite ponderous... More of a GT car than a true sports car. If they can shave off 300-500 lbs and keep power levels similar, performance should remain comparable.
All well and good, but maybe the Z was SUPPOSED to be a GT?

It's the same thing I said with the new Mallfinder:
Why not just make it a new model instead of abberrating an existing, established, beloved nameplate?

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

I'd say probably starting from the Z32, the Z has been more of a GT.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I'd say from the S130. The 280zx was definitely a GT.

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

Nearly forgot about that ugly thing.

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:
AZhitman wrote:If you'll look back, I drove the pre-production 370Z extensively. My biggest complaint was that it's heavy, and a mite ponderous... More of a GT car than a true sports car. If they can shave off 300-500 lbs and keep power levels similar, performance should remain comparable.
All well and good, but maybe the Z was SUPPOSED to be a GT?

It's the same thing I said with the new Mallfinder:
Why not just make it a new model instead of abberrating an existing, established, beloved nameplate?
The Z was designed to be a GT car. Since the S30. There is this video on YouTube that I would find for you but I'm on my mobile. Go to you tube and search for history of Nissan... Or something like that its a 4 part video IIRC. Also watch the video about history of the Z car (its a 6 part video iirc) very interesting stuff, has a bunch of cool facts to.

User avatar
300ZXttZMAN
Posts: 6800
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT 5spd pearl white

DD: 2008 Nissan Frontier NISMO pkg 4x4 Crew Cab
Location: Sulphur, LA 70665
Contact:

Post

@Razi

The 280zx didn't age very well neither did the Z31. The rest of the Z cars are teh sex.:)

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:
AZhitman wrote:If you'll look back, I drove the pre-production 370Z extensively. My biggest complaint was that it's heavy, and a mite ponderous... More of a GT car than a true sports car. If they can shave off 300-500 lbs and keep power levels similar, performance should remain comparable.
All well and good, but maybe the Z was SUPPOSED to be a GT?

It's the same thing I said with the new Mallfinder:
Why not just make it a new model instead of abberrating an existing, established, beloved nameplate?
Once the Z started putting on weight going into the ZX line (280ZX and up), the Z became a boulevard cruiser IMO. Every now and again, you'll see one that blows your socks off performance wise, but, like the Mk IV Supra, most of them just look sexy, push the rollers of a dyno really well, and hard park it like no other.

The Z33 at least tried to get back to what made the Z a homerun. Affordable, quick, and fun. I test drove a 370Z a year or so ago, and I was underwhelmed. My 240 with a tired T25 has more pep and go. The G37S I drove the same day felt even slower and heavier, not surprisingly.

Nissan needs to step back and realize that they do have an open market space they need to attack. The slippery slope they stand on right now if this plan comes to fruition is that the Z has a lineage that has helped sell the car. The Z is already filling its role well enough and there is no need to try to shift it to a new market opening just because Nissan dropped the ball 5 years ago when they SHOULD have been developing a platform to compete against the Subiyota and Hyundai. I was taken aback when Nissan didn't follow through with their usual tactic of releasing a new S chassis a year after a new GT-R, and then when the rumor mill of an S16 ground to a halt when Nissan flat out said they weren't developing it. All of the press generated back then was a perfect opportunity to have taken the reigns of a market share that needed a car to step in early. Now, they've lost the momentum of word of mouth, they've lost any kind of "we did it first" mentality by stepping back into the econobox RWD market before Subaru, Toyota, and Hyundai. And with Toyota's new "Supercar" (read spiritual success for the Supra), Nissan thinks it's a good idea to shift the primary munition it has against that to compete in the $20k market?

Nissan execs pay marketers good money to analyze trends that can make money. I think they paid the wrong people, and now those people are scrambling to fill in a void they knew needed filling years ago. The time has come and passed, and this sounds like a rash knee jerk reaction to a market shift that Nissan dismissed years ago. At this point, the best thing Nissan could do is spend a year or two scrambling to make a small platform that utilizes the suspension designs used in the Z34, slap a RWD juke motor with a turbo on it, a 6 speed, and release it to the wild. Leave the Z where it is, and slot something else into the spot. There should be no fear of delineating the line up and over saturating cross-platform market share as the Z will continue to sell to the people who have always bought it, and the new car will sell to people who are looking for that first fun car out of college after they get their first job.

User avatar
Kompresshun
Administrator
Posts: 3633
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 7:41 am
Car: 2020 Nissan Pathfinder SV 4x4, 2017 Ford F150 4x4 SuperCab 3.5L Ecoboost/10AT, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder SE Offroad 5AT
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

While I think the concept is a great idea for Nissan, making it out of the Z is a pile of stupidity. As previously said - If it's backed by a CVT, i'm completely through with Nissan. Heck, before this it was already dim that I would buy a Nissan again, especially a newer one. Nissan has been doing a lot more wrong than right lately and with the track they've been on, I sure hope they prove me wrong, because there are a lot more attractive options out there right now.

User avatar
Mr1der
Posts: 36020
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 8:35 am
Car: It's still not a Nissan...
Location: Lebanon TN

Post

did Nissan hire NBC execs?

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19005
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

Does this mean the aging VQ is on it's way out?

I don't get why they can't just add technology to the VQ like direct injection to get better fuel economy and power, or develop a new V6.
Also, who says they have to use a 4 banger that is currently in their stable? I predict they either bore and stroke an MR up to 2.4 liters and turbo it (and call it either the Nissan Z or 240z), they stay with a V6, or they completely sell their souls and use a 4 banger from another make (like Mercedes *shudders*).

I'd like to see a direct injected turbo ~2.4l I6 personally. Have your cake and eat it too.

User avatar
IanS
Posts: 9758
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:07 pm
Car: 2002 Subaru WRX, 2010 Subaru Forester XT, 2004 Infiniti G35 Coupe.
Location: Esko, MN
Contact:

Post

Hey Greg, any idea who would have had the final say on neutering the Z in such a fashion? Its time to start writing angry letters.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

Well, I'm not going to buy a new Nissan ever anyway, so I don't care much. They have done pretty good at fu*king things up so far, why not continue down the stupid path as before.


Return to “General Chat”