Ah. That would be why then. No loophole they had to find to not pay. No comprehensive, no money for you.Dattebayo wrote:It's only liability.
Still sucks though. Hopefully someone finds it.
Ah. That would be why then. No loophole they had to find to not pay. No comprehensive, no money for you.Dattebayo wrote:It's only liability.
Liability only makes sense. But Dave, if you had theft insurance on that car, I'm sure you would have been required to surrender the title to them in order to get paid.Dattebayo wrote:[
No. The bill of sale is fine. How many times do I have to say that?
It's because of the grade of insurance on it. It's only liability.
How would he have theft (comprehensive) if he only had liability with his insurance company?Bubba1 wrote:
Liability only makes sense. But Dave, if you had theft insurance on that car, I'm sure you would have been required to surrender the title to them in order to get paid.
ADDirishboy wrote:How would he have theft (comprehensive) if he only had liability with his insurance company?Bubba1 wrote:
Liability only makes sense. But Dave, if you had theft insurance on that car, I'm sure you would have been required to surrender the title to them in order to get paid.
If I were going to steal a car, it certainly wouldn't be one I thought had to be worked on every day.Dattebayo wrote:Shame is damn right. This neighborhood doesn't get any of that sort of thing. I'm wondering if the construction crew guys who worked on the next door basement were eyeing it. They saw me work on it every day.
I've already asked my neighbor to look in on it.
Then again, you aren't Mexican. The police also threw out the possibility that Pepco might have towed it away because of the storm damage repairs... Said they would check the lot for that.Encryptshun wrote:If I were going to steal a car, it certainly wouldn't be one I thought had to be worked on every day.
das racist!ADDirishboy wrote:
It's always the messicans!
This just pisses me off. A credit rating is no indicator of accident risk!Dattebayo wrote: They don't like my credit rating.
insurance fraud?PoorManQ45 wrote:This just pisses me off. A credit rating is no indicator of accident risk!Dattebayo wrote: They don't like my credit rating.
It's a real shock to hear you complaining about the unfairness in the world.PoorManQ45 wrote:This just pisses me off. A credit rating is no indicator of accident risk!
Elizabeth Mosley wrote:Insurance is based on risk, and research has shown that individuals who tend to not pay their bills on time -- and then get low credit scores -- file more claims, and that those claims are more expensive.*
It is you, after all. You can handle it.Dattebayo wrote:NO news.
And good lord, whomever thinks they need to be so cool as to post up the typical recovery percentage, please quit it.
I really love it when people try to kick you when you're down.
Oh, and this too.BusyBadger wrote:Elizabeth Mosley wrote:Insurance is based on risk, and research has shown that individuals who tend to not pay their bills on time -- and then get low credit scores -- file more claims, and that those claims are more expensive.*
Think of it as financial profiling.
*Read the full article here