Which is exactly what I am doing...=) Should be done by the end of January....irax wrote:seriously this is slightly what im doing... but im doing around 13:1 compression and ITB's.... whats the dyno???
I'm calling BS. I'll believe 13:1 when I see it. You planning on running 116 all the time in your Daily Driver? I'm guessing not...irax wrote:seriously this is slightly what im doing... but im doing around 13:1 compression and ITB's.... whats the dyno???
I would have to agree. No way with 13.1:1 or even in the CR of 12:1 for that matter. Guy's out here in Cali have a hard enough time trying to run compression in the high 11:1 CR's without getting knock and ping on your basic 91 Octane, hell that CR (11:1) doesn't even run good on 96. Shiat just blew up an L28 that was running too rich on 91 octane and it had a CR of 10:7, ( well didn't really blow it up just have this knock and ping that is sooo loud you wouldn't want to drive on the road).I have struggled trying to find a decent streetable compression for my KA. Finally came across the Super Techs (10.5:1) that were moderately priced, and speaking with a few smog techs, I'm still going to have to get it down to atleast 10:1 using thicker metal gaskets to make it streetable and smogable on 91Octane.PandaS14 wrote:
I'm calling BS. I'll believe 13:1 when I see it. You planning on running 116 all the time in your Daily Driver? I'm guessing not...
No it's geared towards people that start a B.S thread that they can't finish with results. Then continue the thread with remarks that 13.1:1 is streetable. There are those that know the B.S when they hear it from experience and those that make up the B.S thinking it is believeable to everyone else. It's the one thing that makes the forums a shiaty place to come too, and it ruins this thing called integrity........veilside180sx wrote: Although I don't think that pessimism was geared towards me.
Which I completely undestand and agree with. I'm not one of those people though.Bigvinnie wrote:
No it's geared towards people that start a B.S thread that they can't finish with results. Then continue the thread with remarks that 13.1:1 is streetable. There are those that know the B.S when they hear it from experience and those that make up the B.S thinking it is believeable to everyone else. It's the one thing that makes the forums a shiaty place to come too, and it ruins this thing called integrity........
Fact is 13.1:1 could be streetable but not here in the U.S on the pump gas that we have to offer.
I regret keeping this thread in suspense. I've had too many problems trying to keep the people working on this project focused on the task at hand. Trust me- no one is as frustrated as I am with the length of this project. At this point, I know that all the work has been completed, engine is in the car as of Thanksgiving (I've seen pictures of this- car is 400 miles away), and by this time, the car should be up and running ready for full break-in.That is the state of the car right now. When the car is ready and dynoed, I will post results.Tulsa_S-13 wrote:This thread was started in March..... where are the numbers?
I know it is his only car.zippitta wrote: If I remember right, the guy never said that he was going to daily drive it. He just said that he wanted 13:1. Dont try to rip someones head off without asking first.
Yeah, automatics and AWD cars will obviously have more drivetrain loss, but 35% on any manual 2WD car is WAY overestimating it.dfw240_EE wrote:I think 35% is a reasonable number for drivetrain loss, but not for the 240SX. Different cars get different losses. I could see an automatic AWD car getting 35%. I also remember reading in Car & Driver that the Suzuki Verona gets a 35% drivetrain loss. Something to do with the suspension being abnormally short to accommodate a transverse mounted straight 6 engine causing a somewhat awkward design.
16% is about right I think for a manual transmission RWD. A manual FWD would be even lower, nearer 10%.
Same way that F1 gets 800hp from a 3L. High revs.A34D4ME wrote:How do those bike engines put out 185 HP from 1L?