Stupid swedish guys and their tractors...WDRacing wrote:Holy crap I giggled like a school girl the whole friggin time...Mike will love that vid man.
Best N/A? Probably BMW, 100hp+ per litre stock, that´s crazy...The best N/A is often the best boosted as well, as long as the block and other stuff can stand the extra abuse.Logan76 wrote:Why are we not considering the Best N/A 6 cyl? lets do that while were at it, obviously the KA has yet to see over 200hp at the wheels without alot of money thrown at it in N/A form, so what can I drop into my 240 that will net me good N/A horsepower out of a 6 cyl, lets broaden our thought train a little?
as did I the first time I saw it.WDRacing wrote:Holy crap I giggled like a school girl the whole friggin time...Mike will love that vid man.
Yeah, I´ve seen some sick wagons as well. Saw a white street legal 740 making 9´s last year...Mr1der wrote:as did I the first time I saw it.
I really wanna find a turbo wagon because of that.
I agree with WD about NA power...unless you want that delicious sound an inline 6 makes.
Do you really think the Subaru engine is better than 2JZ and BMW M-engines?page02wrx wrote:Subaru H6 swap.....
Cheaply built (deck, clean, bore, hone, forged rods/pistons) will handle 1000+hp..... due to the fact the boxer motor is a perfectly balanced motor....
How fathomable is the swap into a nissan? I wouldn't even want to think about it.... plus you pretty much need the sti 6spd transmission which is $4500...
nope, not at all.... 2jz is probably the most dominating USDM 6cyl motor.... along with the rb26 on the JDMSwedish Mike wrote:
Do you really think the Subaru engine is better than 2JZ and BMW M-engines?
If you mean it would cheaper to do a 2JZ swap then yes.page02wrx wrote:
sure as hell a lot cheaper though, will make the same power, and in a subaru takes less horsepower to run faster qrtmile times (<-- assuming its in an awd subaru)
.....
Slower traps maybe.... yes. Not slower times. The AWD car may ESSENTIALLY be a slower car, but can attain faster quarter mile times....WDRacing wrote:
If you mean it would cheaper to do a 2JZ swap then yes.
Also, AWD is slower in the 1/4. The only exception being the GTR because it transitions into 2WD once traction is attained. The parasitic loss from driving all 4 wheels really hurts STI's and EVO's. On a road course they are animals for sure, but in a straight line, rwd owns.
Agree, RWD rule drag racing, hard to beat with MT tires.I saw a 9 sec Audi drag race last year, he had the front wheels in the air when launching, the 4WD were extra weight in that car.WDRacing wrote:I've seen LOTS of AWD cars launch and LOTS of GTRs launch. I can get just as much traction and cut 1.5 60" with a RWD car. You'll do no better with AWD, and when you start putting down enough power to out drag me, you puke trannies left and right to actually launch the car hard enough to break a 1.5 60".
I'm not saying they aren't slow but it is no way near fact that a AWD car is faster, thats a dumb statement. Launching is all about weight transfer. With a good set of drag radials and a 1/2 decent suspension setup, I'll launch just as hard as any awd.
They DO NOT spend all their time playing catchup...where are you from and who are you racing?
WD