Thats about the only way I can see of doing it. There's room inside the front cover for a larger gear, and making the chain longer is no sweat. The driven gear is just flat plate steel (or some other metal, not sure yet).Carl H wrote:so it is an oil surge issue then...hrum.im curious to see what mettler was on about when it came to running a line directly to the oil galleys.im also curious to see how they are reducing pressure to the pump...larger drive gear for the oil pump?
Yea, mine was an Early bottom end.gs14racer wrote:Id jump on it stephen,
I spun number 6 on my first motor as well.
Another thing just out of curiosity if the motors that are spinning rod bearings are 1st gen or 2nd gen.
Mine was a first gen, i believe stephens was a first gen bottome end as well
Yeah that is interesting, although I imagine the factory Nissan O-rings would probably be Viton... though old o-rings are s*** no matter what material!darinz wrote:So I wonder if running avgas all the time has killed the seals? Interesting thought. My motor hasn't been apart so all O rings are still factory?
Mines a 1st gen as well. And it spun #6! A few to many coincidences there I think!!!!gs14racer wrote:Id jump on it stephen,
I spun number 6 on my first motor as well.
Another thing just out of curiosity if the motors that are spinning rod bearings are 1st gen or 2nd gen.
Mine was a first gen, i believe stephens was a first gen bottome end as well
Might be interested. Do you want to give me a call at some stage? 0275 330637.holeset wrote:try nizbits , we picked up a low k complete front cut for bout 1700 from memory,ive got a bottom end thats also run a bearing if ya want to pursue the rebuild option,we didnt bother cause of the cost,its got a damaged rod and journal and signs of very high ks
I found some awesome pics of a VH45 teardown here:Mettler wrote:The other thing he mentioned was that the oil has a bit of a mazelike pathway from the filter housing all the way to the back of the block and up to the middle rail where it feeds the mains.
They don't bother with this, and plumb a line from the filter straight into the front of this rail in the front of the block (under the water pump) using a modified -12 fitting.
I think the main gallery is normally fed from the rear of the block (where 7 & 8 are), so it would be the other way around: 1 & 2 would be drying out. Mettler's stockcar builder acquaintance apparently ran an extra feed to the front of the main gallery, via the port at the front of the block; so the main gallery on that motor is being fed from both ends... right?Wes M wrote:Looking at the diameter of the plug (and therefore the oil rail) and then at the diameter of the holes feeding oil to the crank shaft I'm thinking there may be a considerable pressure drop by the time the oil reaches the last bearing. Though if this were the case one would expect problems on nos 7 & 8. Is there only a single feed for the oil rail (the one on the front)?
Here are a couple of photo's of where the crack is. You can't see it in the photo's due to the flash but it is just visible with a close inspection. The crack is right at the end of the magnet and runs across the journal at 90*.Wes M wrote:Hi Darinz,
Did your engine builder spot the crack visually or through magnetic particle inspection? Have you got a picture of the location?
If you come through Auckland at any stage I'd be keen to crack test it - it will show the full length of the crack and may help find the cause. I find it quite a coincidence the location of the crack and spun bearing..
I was presuming (dangerous I know) that the plug existed there because the rail was drilled through the front of the block. This being the case the ID of the rail couldn't be greater than the size of the plug. Unless (and someone would have to confirm this cause my gearbox is in place at the moment) there was a larger plug on the rear end of the block.Mettler wrote:Hang on, don't go judging the inside diameter of the main oil gallery by the size of the plug in the front! As you can see by the design of it, the plug couldn't physically be any larger anyway because there simply wouldn't be room for it without interfering with the water pump etc. The plug's size does not imply the oil rail is that small.
On a VH41 the plug looks bigger, check it out:
I don't think there are any pressure problems with regards to the size of the oil gallery, or any pressure loss to the front of the motor... Nissan surely wouldn't have cocked that up! After all, the oil pump design is excessive overkill!
And I'm not sure whether he said the main gallery is fed from both ends, but it certainly makes sense... unless all of the oil is routed directly into the front and the rear feed blocked up?
Spun bearings can be caused by a number of issues... and it's probably best to try and address them all. It makes sense that frothed up oil could be one of them, and bearing clearance could be another. Just kill all those birds in one go and you should be alright!
When you say 'across the journal at 90*' do you mean longitudinal to the crankshaft direction? Or at right angles to the length of the crank? Cracks in the longitudinal direction are sometimes caused by grinding. Transverse is a different matter.darinz wrote:
Here are a couple of photo's of where the crack is. You can't see it in the photo's due to the flash but it is just visible with a close inspection. The crack is right at the end of the magnet and runs across the journal at 90*.
I'm down in Auckland a bit so I'll sort out to bring it down and you can have a look at it. Finding out what happened would be a good thing for all of us!
Longitudinal to the crank. Where the flash reflection is, is exactly where the crack is.Wes M wrote:
When you say 'across the journal at 90*' do you mean longitudinal to the crankshaft direction? Or at right angles to the length of the crank? Cracks in the longitudinal direction are sometimes caused by grinding. Transverse is a different matter.
I'll be away down south this coming week but will be back again the week after.