How about both...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRb5Me3rALArb25drag wrote:I wouldn't do it on the RB eninge, But just curious about a DD.
Nah Im still doing propane!! That Idea is still in the works!!gawdzilla wrote:not doing the propane anymore?
First, a little background on me. I have worked for Ford and am currently working for GM. For ford I worked in the hybrid division and was a part of the R&D of the Fuel cell focus. Currently I am a high voltage batttery calibration engineer for GM....ItzGenX wrote:Actually these HHO or Brown Gas devices work to some extent. Even though you produce less energy then it takes to split the water, a small mix of HHO in the combustion chamber helps stabilize gasoline's violent burn. In other words, it is sort of like an octane buffer that also makes additional power on it's own. When it combusts, it turns right back into water and has an implosion effect. Then the small amount of water (not even a drop) will vaporize in the gasoline's flame front and expand again in flash steam. This all allows the vehicle to produce the same amount of power with a leaner mix of gasoline and avoiding the adverse effects of a lean burn at the same time.
I've made plenty of simple electrolyzers for clean burn torches and such. I even have one installed on my 92' Accord EX 2DR 5SPD daily driver. It went from 28mpg to 41mpg. Installing one on a car will require some sort of leaning trickery. "Why?" you ask? Well the extra oxygen from splitting water is added to the oxygen already present in ambient air. All this extra oxygen produces a more robust and complete burn causing the oxygen sensor to trip out into a Lean Alarm to the ecu. A simple AFC, EFIE, or like me, a simple oxygen sensor spacer can prevent the lean alert causing the ecu to dump in more fuel. My oxygen sensor spacer is made from a spark plug non fouler. All you do is drill out the center to 1/2" to allow the tip of the oxygen sensor to fit into it. Screw the sensor with spacer back into the exhaust and voila. I've also created a pulse circuit so that my unit still makes the same amount of HHO, but only draws 1/3 of the amperage (8 amps instead of 25 amps without it).
I do however think those websites are scams based on how much they charge for the units. It only costs maybe $50 bucks to make one. They also do not tell you that you will need to lean out your car somehow. So bolting on one of their units 'as is' will actually cause you to burn more fuel. If you are wondering how it works, spend a little free time and search youtube for HHO, Electrolysis, Hydrogen Water, Stanley Meyers, Bob Boyce, etc.
If you still do not think it is possible, check out the Scorpion. It comes with a OEM factory created electrolysis system. http://www.motorauthority.com/...-car/
Next time, do your research before crying. There are communities as large as car forums if you search around. http://www.overunity.com
My digi cam broke when my cousin was holding it out the window to get a better view of a street race. Well lets just say he slipped and at 100mph, it didn't stay in one piece. He now owes me a digi cam btw. My setup design is what is known as a "Smacks Booster". The plans are readily available across the internet if you search it by that name. The only addition I have is a "Dave Lawton D14" circuit that I built from the schematics I found. I have the unit itself ziptied between the A/C condensor and bumper support with the top of it visible if I pop off my honda grill. That way I can easily service it without removing the whole thing if need be. I have the PDF file "how-to" for building the cell itself. I do not have a place to upload it to though.rb25drag wrote:Thanks for the posts guys, Alot of info in here. Whether it works or not, I think im going to try and build one of my own and try it on my DD, S10 pickup, That will answer my question of if it works or not. As for trying to save gas on the Rb? HAHA I don't think I care about it. It hardly ever moves anyways. If your really worried about combustion temps then you need to convert to alcohol.
ItzGenX, I would like to see some pics of your setup.
You talk like you work for a major car manufacturer. I mean you are talking for them, by saying that this "kit" is impractical to them...ItzGenX wrote:My plugs are fine and have been for over a year. The combustion temps do not go that high as to have a failure. If you lean the engine out this much without having such a system installed, then yes, it will cause some damage. The point is, the system allows alternative fueling elsewhere, meaning you can input less of your primary fuel source into the mix. It is the only reason you can lean it out to begin with. Do the math, if you take out this much gasoline here, you can cover it by adding this much hydrogen to take up the slack. Hydrogen has a leaner combustable air ratio then gasoline. Also, water as a liquid has the highest thermal absorbtion rate then any other available liquid. This becomes additional octane rating for the gasoline. Car manufacturers have their cars tuned to run RICH. Why you say? Everyone here knows why we run rich. They use that extra fuel to cool the temps to prevent damage. Remember that thing about water being a better thermal sponge then gasoline? Here is where it shines. Not only do you get to replace that EXTRA fuel they use to cool the combustion temps, since the hydrogen mix adds some power AND COOLS BETTER, you can lean out a hair further and still make the same amount of power. You may see it as simple as all that is happening is you are running lean, but you have to see why you CAN run lean in this process.
Manufacturers see this as impractical. This is because these hydrogen WFC's produce differently based on what kind of water is tossed into there. If it is tap water, sludge from the junk in the tap water will form in the reaction chamber needing to be cleaned very very often. If it is plain distilled water, the water has too much electrical resistance to even get the system jump started to produce hydrogen in the first place. We water fuel cell guys usually use distilled water with a small percentage of potassium hydroxide or KOH, as an electrolyte (and this stuff is dangerous for your every day Joe-Shmoe to service on his car when he needs to refill his water tank and check the electrolyte ratio). There is an alternative to adding baking soda to it, but it isn't as efficient, and it needs to be added to the system more frequently. KOH was added to my system only 3 times in a little over a year since I've had it (KOH does not get used up in the electrolysis process but does deteriorate very very slowly). 25k miles later, I can still vouch for it. Like I said, it is too impractical for your everyday type of people to run one, and this is why the car manufacturers do not want to jump into it. Customers can cause some major damage to the vehicle or themselves if they do not know what they are doing with it. A small concentrated bubble of hydrogen/oxygen mix the size of a golf ball sounds like a 12 gauge shotgun going off. If this mixture goes inside the cell from tampering with it, the cell will go off like a grenade, shrapnel and all. When hydrogen and oxygen are present in a concentrated space at an exact stochiometic (sp?) mix (two H's, one O, or 2:1 Ratio H:O), the flame propogates 50-100 times faster then gasoline. This is why care needs to be taken when working on the cell, and it is something manufacturers do not want any customers fiddling with.
LOL, someone is really feeling high and mighty today eh? I was never trying to prove the industry R&D wrong. When did I say that? Let me clarify for you since you like to take every little thing very litteral and analyze it til it makes you get the runs through the rear. You also like to pretty much call people stupid without just saying they are right? Just because you are working in such a nice place and know their technology etc, doesn't mean you can fully doubt another. You take it like it is so obsolete and wrong. You must have been one of those kids when growing up that thought there was only one right way for everything, and that right way was through you right? So the world is wrong... ok... . Next time add some productive information about the topic of a thread or just keep your peace. It is like you brought tires to work a train station, totally pointless.Racinjitter wrote:
You talk like you work for a major car manufacturer. I mean you are talking for them, by saying that this "kit" is impractical to them...
I dont doubt your car's mileage. But I do doubt the reasons as to why it is getting this mileage.
Manufacturers tune their cars to run rich? WTF? You have no idea what you are talking about. Just stop. So what you are saying is that 17:1 during cruise is rich for a gasoline engine? BTW Greg Banish works with me. I think that if you were ever a first time tuner, you should know his name. We had a conversation about these HHO kits today.... It ended up in laughter.
I am sorry but IF you think you can prove a 16 billion dollar/year industry in R&D wrong, you are sadly mistaken.
I am done with this topic.
I heard this from my dad, He installed one of those kits for a guy this past week so we are deciding to look into it a little more.240z4u wrote:RB25DRAG how did I know you would guinea pig this? Let us know how it goes!
Evan
BTW, sounds like time to move.