AEM Intake Released Today???

A General Discussion forum for Altima owners, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to the NICOclub Altima Forums!
spockrock
Posts: 1170
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:10 pm
Car: Altima Coupe 3.5se

Post

anyone want a mildly used fujita short ram intake??


User avatar
Jose3.5
Posts: 1032
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:04 am
Car: 2007 Nissan Altima SE 3.5

Post

Yup. Datalux showed it to me.

User avatar
adidas2go
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:49 am
Car: Cycle through all kinds of cars, trucks, motorcycles, and boats 🤙
Once upon a time: 1st turbo Altima Coupe
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post

l33th41 wrote:Mods - can you combine the two AEM threads to maximize exposure.

Thanks!
done
SHIFT_COUPE wrote:That's a nice looking piece. Not sure why they are calling to cold air though. In my book, technically the filter element should be down farther outside of the engine bay all together. This does look like it will aid in airflow quite well though.
Agreed. Not a CAI, but is far more functional than any other intake system produced for the a/c, to date.

ursus
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:41 am
Car: 07 Nissan Altima Sedan SE 3.5 6MT

Post

Well, aem gave me an idea to fab up an "air-guider" for the intake, i just molded a thick sheet of aluminum foil taped it in the airduct and fan it out to the intake heat shield.

will drive around tomorrow, prob wont be a big diff I'm guessing.


User avatar
l33th41
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:12 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
2010 Mazda 3

Post




User avatar
D-Roll
Posts: 1501
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:24 am
Car: 08 Nissan 350Z Touring Coupe
Location: Ruskin FL
Contact:

Post

So what about the 2.5's?? WTF! Nice design though. Modified my stock ram air piece for direct flow to the air filter as well. It does make a difference. I have removed the stock ram air part before and drove around, not the same.

User avatar
Serkle K
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:33 pm
Car: 1996 Altima - A/C enthusiast

Post

SHIFT_COUPE wrote:That's a nice looking piece. Not sure why they are calling to cold air though. In my book, technically the filter element should be down farther outside of the engine bay all together. This does look like it will aid in airflow quite well though.
adidas2go wrote:Agreed. Not a CAI, but is far more functional than any other intake system produced for the a/c, to date.
Wouldn't this be more of a true short RAM intake?

User avatar
Scandinavian Flick
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:07 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 3.5SE

Post

correct me if im wrong but doesnt there dyno chart seem a little pessimistic, i mean its a 270 HP engine that they claim dynoed it at a peak 187. i know there is drivetrain loss but thats an 83 horse loss.

racingtiger03
Posts: 229
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:41 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe Code Red 2.5S

Post

Scandinavian Flick wrote:correct me if im wrong but doesnt there dyno chart seem a little pessimistic, i mean its a 270 HP engine that they claim dynoed it at a peak 187. i know there is drivetrain loss but thats an 83 horse loss.
I'm glad to know I wasnt the only one wandering about that..

ursus
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:41 am
Car: 07 Nissan Altima Sedan SE 3.5 6MT

Post

Scandinavian Flick wrote:correct me if im wrong but doesnt there dyno chart seem a little pessimistic, i mean its a 270 HP engine that they claim dynoed it at a peak 187. i know there is drivetrain loss but thats an 83 horse loss.
Dont sweat it, that's how CVT's dynos are.

User avatar
Hussain
Posts: 3162
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:54 pm
Car: 08 Altima Coupe 3.5se CVT

Post

what kind of idiot would use a CVT? lol everyone knows the numbers are all over the place with a CVT..... plus now they're trying to say $410? that's crazy! i mean you can get a NON carb legal intake for most cars for around $80. this is a CARB legal one so i know it will cost but how much is the stillen intake? mid to low $200's? this thing is almost DOUBLE the price. waaaaaaaay too expensive. i like it and everything but i wouldn't buy it till it has a major price drop OR get the stillen (or injen) intake and custom fab something to make it the same

paul10019
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:06 pm
Car: Altima Coupe

Post

i will definately get it when they make one for 2.5s. if they get one for 2.5s can we start a group buy !?

User avatar
SlayerKmA
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 5:36 am
Car: Nissan Altima 3.5 SE Coupe 6MT (Super Black)
Contact:

Post

I'd also be interested in getting this....I love the fact that the filter goes to the front instead of the bottom of the car, no more worrying about hydrolock specially here in South Fl. where there's flooding all the time.I also found this site selling it for $369... http://www.upscaleautomotive.c....aspx

User avatar
Scandinavian Flick
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:07 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 3.5SE

Post

i hadn't seen any true cold air systems yet, good find

User avatar
phobs
Posts: 1503
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: San Diego

Post

it says it's for pre-order, so maybe it is a "still in development CAI".

User avatar
tuffmag
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 3:49 pm
Car: 2008 Winter Frost, Altima coupe 3.5SE CVT, Premium, Technology Package

Post

theoctopussi wrote:I've read that AEM builds NISMO's intakes? if I'm wrong my bad, but if not, that's what the nismo intake is gonna look like...

you can all me Poontang. LOL
You could be correct Poontang...and if AEM does make NISMO branded then I owe you an apologies....

What bumbs me out is now i have to look at the new intake and look at the cost before removal of my Injen....
Modified by tuffmag at 9:09 AM 7/13/2008

User avatar
tuffmag
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 3:49 pm
Car: 2008 Winter Frost, Altima coupe 3.5SE CVT, Premium, Technology Package

Post

[QUOTE=Hussain $410? that's crazy! i mean you can get a NON carb legal intake for most cars for around $80. i like it and everything but i wouldn't buy it till it has a major price drop OR get the stillen (or injen) intake and custom fab something to make it the same [/QUOTE]

YEP...YEP

08altima35
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:31 pm
Car: 08 Nissan Altima Coupe SE 3.5 6Spd Manny Artisan Turbo Dark Slate

Post

ursus wrote:
Dont sweat it, that's how CVT's dynos are.
i seriously doubt they used and posted dyno results from a cvt, but someone should email or call them to find out for sure.

User avatar
mazda2005
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:09 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe 3.5 BLACK

Post

if someone was to buy this part i dont understand about the previous post showing aluminum foil used on the install. Is that right?

User avatar
theoctopussi
Posts: 608
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:07 pm
Car: 2008 Altima Coupe 2.5 6MT
Contact:

Post

no prob... yeah, I have the stillen one right now, so I gotta take this one off... I'm really liking this aem one tho

User avatar
l33th41
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:12 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
2010 Mazda 3

Post

08altima35 wrote:
i seriously doubt they used and posted dyno results from a cvt, but someone should email or call them to find out for sure.
aem rep stated it was a manual

User avatar
Altima_Coupe
Posts: 514
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:45 pm
Car: 08 Altima Coupe 3.5se

Post

l33th41 wrote:
aem rep stated it was a manual
tht sounds a little off.

User avatar
Scandinavian Flick
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:07 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 3.5SE

Post

83 horse loss.... on a manual... that would make the a/c have to worst drive train loss ive ever heard of, a 30.7% loss

JacobHum
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:35 pm
Car: 1999 Toyota 4Runner SR5 4WD 3.4L V6
Contact:

Post

hmm maybe they thought it was 3.5 but they really tested a 2.5 lol? wouldnt that be hilarious? That would be the reason of the low HP and Torque

ursus
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:41 am
Car: 07 Nissan Altima Sedan SE 3.5 6MT

Post

08altima35 wrote:
i seriously doubt they used and posted dyno results from a cvt, but someone should email or call them to find out for sure.
I dont know if this will make you feel better, Fujita dynoed a 6MT sedan for their intake, its around 245hp~, after a gain of 12hp.

If it was really a manual, I dont know what to say.

EDIT: for those of you who are interested to see their dyno. 245http://www.f5air.com/images/dyno/sr2828.gifThe owner actually dynoed out at 261FWHP later at another date.

User avatar
Scandinavian Flick
Posts: 605
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:07 pm
Car: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe 3.5SE

Post

ursus wrote:
I dont know if this will make you feel better, Fujita dynoed a 6MT sedan for their intake, its around 243hp~, after a gain of 12hp.

If it was really a manual, I dont know what to say.
strangely enough, that does make me feel better

User avatar
l33th41
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:12 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
2010 Mazda 3

Post

Scandinavian Flick wrote:83 horse loss.... on a manual... that would make the a/c have to worst drive train loss ive ever heard of, a 30.7% loss
I'm having the rep I've been in contact with get ahold of someone in r&d for me. I'll post what I find out.

User avatar
l33th41
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:12 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
2010 Mazda 3

Post

AEM's DYNO TESTING PROCEDURES AEM performs its dynamometer testing in a consistent fashion in an effort to deliver the most accurate results. Our dyno testing procedures are carried out with the hood up, with a fan placed in front of the radiator and another fan at the rear of the vehicle to force exhaust gases from the testing area. We perform the testing in this fashion because it most accurately reflects actual driving conditions.

We have performed extensive temperature studies using thermocouples placed throughout the engine compartment and air filter inlet to determine nominal operating temperatures of inlet air. We have found that underhood air temperatures are best replicated by performing dyno testing with the hood up. Without an open hood or fan to replicate what the car would experience if it were on the street and not on a dyno, the testing would not be an accurate representation of either the car's performance, or the functioning of any performance parts.

For example, the open hood allows air to flow through the engine compartment as it would if the vehicle were moving, and the fan in front of the radiator mimics the flow of air that would pass through it if the car were not stationary on a dyno. Think of it this way, for a 180 HP car that revs to 8,000 rpm, a third gear dyno pull to redline is equivalent to a run of approximately 90 mph, depending on gear ratio and tire size.

Furthermore, all numbers are corrected to SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) standards for altitude, ambient air temperature and humidity per the program supplied with the Dynojet Dyno that we use (in this case it was a Model 248C Dynojet Chassis Dynamometer). We do this because, according to SAE, horsepower should be measured under a consistent set of conditions.

When we perform dyno testing, we monitor engine temperatures and inlet air temperatures to achieve consistent data. We DO NOT move the vehicle off of the dyno once it is strapped down, and install the performance part we are testing with the car still strapped to the dyno once we have established a baseline number. This is because we have found that vehicle alignment on a dyno will affect the results of a test-and moving a car once it is strapped down can lead to incorrect data.

User avatar
l33th41
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:12 am
Car: 2010 Nissan 370Z
2010 Mazda 3

Post

GBs are to be setup by MODS and ADMIN only.

User avatar
maxentropy
Posts: 1755
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:25 am
Car: '08 Altima Coupe 3.5SE
Location: Collegeville, PA
Contact:

Post

I'mma wait and see what NISMO comes up with for their Cold Air Intake that's in dev... but I like what I see here...


Return to “Altima General Discussions”