Post by
RobDET »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/robdet-u7114.html
Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:14 am
I got the replys much faster than i though... Heres the dirt...
Quote »NICO wrote: "is this tune so radical that the motor might blow? I would imagine this engine is tuned to live a month using a ****load of timing and alot of octane." [/quote]91 octane was used on the dyno with absolutely no detonation.
Quote »NICO wrote: "According to AEM, if I have the EMS with their intake I'll have 160rwhp." [/quote]The 240SX had a short ram intake (for all tests).
Quote »NICO wrote: "Is that much of a gain really possible? That's a little too much for an n/a engine running OEM componentry." [/quote]What is more ridiculous? A 1990's DOHC Motor that makes 52whp/liter or a 1990's DOHC Motor that makes 63whp/liter. In my opinion, this is still far from "radical". Especially for a 2001 motor (Altima). Remember, in 1987, Honda was making 100hp/liter on their production B16As.
Quote »NICO wrote: Sounds a little outlandish to me. A KA with an added 2-3 degrees of timing might produce 3-4rwhp more over the powerband, added with fuel tuning you might get another 5whp peak out of it. I just don't see a 37rwhp gain over a BONE stock engine." [/quote]The EMS does not clock your distributor and bump your fuel pressure. The EMS tunes ignition timing and fuel (sequentially) with respect to RPM and Engine Load. It can also adjust injector phasing, coil dwell, etc.