gabossie wrote:I like the fact that he describes the Z as slow and the RX-8 as fast. Not only does the RX-8 have a significantly lower HP figure, but it has no torque and they have had a lot of problems with reliable HP figures too. I believe it's now rated quite a bit lower than it originally was.
Altiman94 wrote:It about time they start telling the truth about that pile.
SeVa-S13 wrote:That "pile" just matched the 350Z's lap time with 60 less HP and buckets of less Torque, howabout a little respect? Although I do think he was a bit off mark when he made fun of the Z31...the 84 Special Edition Turbo with the two-tone paint job is one of the nicest looking older cars I've seen irl.
Oh, and I'm English, and there are ignorant pricks from every country that readily bash other countries without much reason, as you guys so readily demonstrated.
As for the "zed" thing, in America, you pronounce "Z" as "zee", everywhere else English is spoken, it's pronounced "zed." Just a frinedly FYI.![]()
victim_of_a_down wrote:LOL Ah, the infamous Jeremy Clarkson, he's always been known for his sardonic punchlines. I have to question such a low rating for the Z (3/10?!) but he does have legitimate gripes. Though I think it's a sexy car, not everyone likes the styling of the 350Z. Americans and Europeans have different driving sensibilities. But then again, maybe it's just because he's so jaded from driving so many fine exotics? Anyway the RX8 is sooo damn sexy!
fuzion wrote:Mazda released a statement saying it's 9hp less than advertised and offered to buy back any RX-8 purchased before the date of their statement.. Still 200+ hp from 1.3 liters and a 9000 rpm redline in a silky smooooth rotary gets me excited![]()