Agreed, but if you've lived in the US for any amount of time, you know that there will always have to be a "bad guy". SOme people can't sleep until they have someone to blame. And the media won't sleep until everyone knows who that is. SAD, but the truth.C-Kwik wrote:Just watched the press conference. It's sad to me that many members of the media are turning this into a critique of the handling of the situation while the dead bodies are still warm. This is not the time. Neither for the media or us. We have plenty of time to reflect on how to improve any institution's response to situations like this. Right now, we should be focused on reaching out to those directly affected by this and making sure there is no longer an immediate threat.
My condolances go out to anyone that is affected by this.
They already have a bad guy. The guy that commited the murders. How much more bad guy can you get then that? When you start trying to spread the blame around like that though is not cool.IowaRB240SX wrote:Agreed, but if you've lived in the US for any amount of time, you know that there will always have to be a "bad guy". SOme people can't sleep until they have someone to blame. And the media won't sleep until everyone knows who that is. SAD, but the truth.
Several countries are like that Japan being one and im sure places like England and such have the same law. In some places only certain levels of law inforcement are allowed to carry guns. Everyone else gets clubs and pepper spray.corey240 wrote:what country is it that the police dont even have guns? or only police can have guns? was it japan?
I think is was Australia. I believe their motto was "Don't be like the Americans"corey240 wrote:what country is it that the police dont even have guns? or only police can have guns? was it japan?
That's the question though. What can society do to prevent this from happening? Well, like some you could say that guns are the problem. That's not a good point to bring up at all for obvious reasons. The only way to get rid of guns is mystically erasing them all from existence. Not possible, so im not even going there.ScorchedNX2K wrote:the funny thing (morbid i know) is that there isn't a damn thing we can do about it anyways.
You are right, it's not. But guns were used so the topic will come up. That's inevitable. In all, we are trying discuss our feelings on the matter, and to debate how to prevent this. And a good debate has to be argued from both sides. I am not bringing up gun control, but I will defend my side of the issue. Everyone has an opinion, and should be free to discuss/defend it. But we are all too wiling to blame the weapon, not so much the guy holding it. Would you all be yelling "hair dryer control" if he would have thrown an energized one into the pool killing 33?Eikon wrote:Once again folks... this is not a discussion about Gun Control!
Stop talking about it.
Years in jail mean nothing to a person who plans on killing himself after shooting others...bone_stock_240 wrote:they really need to toughen up on gun crimes. Like mandatory 25 year sentence if a gun is involved, even if it is unloaded and never actually weilded, as long as it is in their possession.
I really hope that noone else succumbs to their injuries. This ******* destroyed the lives of many hundreds of people. He deserves alot worse than the death that he got.
Quite right. No gun control laws could have prevented this from happening. The shooter was willing to pay the ultimate price by commiting suicide, so how would stiffer penalties stopped him. Had the school locked down the death toll might have been less, but there still would have been quite a bit of blood shed.LayNLow240 wrote:even if we did have tougher penalties, it wouldnt have stopped the guy from doing what he did. he offed himself, so nothing would have worked to prevent him from doing it.