RAP14 wrote:We plan on purchasing a 2014 CUV in the next 1-5 months. We have driven the crv, rav4, escape, and forester. Prior to seeing the 2014 rogue we planned on purchasing the forester... After seeing the new rogue we love the looks and options (the local nissan has a SV in their showroom) it has to offer. We presently have a 2005 accord and 2002 Sienna "both purchased new", our Toyota went 9 years without requiring any non maintenance repairs, strictly tires/brakes etc... Same with our accord, 2 months ago I needed to have a sensor done (not sure which one) but service light came on; other than that car ran perfect, this was a $45 repair... We've become accustomed to this kind of reliability! The comments I've read on this site (about 2014 rogue) relative to build quality and transmission issues give me serious doubts about considering this vehicle. I will continue to monitor for any pertinent updates, positive or negative. On a positive note; I've spoken with half a dozen friends/co-workers that own the Nissan Altima, ranging from 2007 to 2013, they all love it and have had no issues. Is there any definitive information that Nissan USA has addressed the hatch leak and any cvt issues within the build process? Thanks
While I can't answer your question, I can chime in and add that we just purchased a '13 Rav4.
We looked at everything in the segment (minus the Forester, idiot subaru salesman heard us say Forester, brought around an Outback to test drive... they had 2 Foresters on the lot and 87 Outbacks...trying too hard to push inventory) and it came down to CR-V, Nissan Rogue, or Rav4. Being a die-hard Honda fan, the CR-V had a leg up already just because it sat behind an "H". Sadly, the CR-V seems very dated in comparison to the Rav4. Looks being subjective, the Rav had a slight edge over the CR-V in my opinion but neither are my favorite, looks-wise. The Honda is also lacking a lot of new and what I consider "standard" features. It's a great vehicle for what it is, no doubt. Had Toyota not offered special financing and such, it would have been a more difficult decision.
This very thread helped push us over the edge in terms of ruling out the Nissan. Rogue has the looks, inside and out. And the feature list. But ultimately, I wanted something that was safe, reliable, and versitle in terms of our plans for the vehicle. See, we're not sure how long we're going to keep this CUV. We may decide to trade up in 3 years or we may keep it for 10. The Rav seemed to be a win in either regard. If we trade in 3 years, we lessen the financial loss and if we decide to keep it longer, we know it's going to be solid. Not to mention, I searched for common problems with the Rav being that it's in the first (well now second) year of the model. Couldn't find anything. They didn't hardly change ANYTHING between 13 and 14 so that right there tells you that it was a good design to begin with (or the major flaws havn't come out yet in a year).
My main concerns with the Nissan were reliability of the CVT (which can also lead to a safety concern), and nothing solid on resale or trade-in numbers. I didn't want to set myself up to have to take the vehicle in for large or small repairs regularly and I didn't want to set myself up to take a loss should I want to trade in -- forcing myself to be stuck with something that isn't as reliable as I would have hoped.
Did we make the right move? I don't know. Time will tell. Thanks to everyone for all of the info. I would recommend anyone interested in the Rogue to give the Rav4 a solid look too.