word! if i ever get rid of my sr, im going turbo ls1leesredgt wrote:I would personally rather keep my RB and take my chances with the POPO.
Just my opinion.If i was gonna do another swap it would be a LS1.
im sorry, but you cant beat the power to weight ratio of an ls1. who cares if its a chevy motorSalem240 wrote: I just couldn't shove a chevy motor in my 240 even if it has more power. My 2nd choice of course would be going RB.
UMMM.... .... I do. I'm not concerned enough about having a little extra na horses to put a chevy motor in my twoforty .heartofaskyline wrote:
im sorry, but you cant beat the power to weight ratio of an ls1. who cares if its a chevy motor
umm... try more like double the horsepower. plus its lighterSalem240 wrote:
UMMM.... .... I do. I'm not concerned enough about having a little extra na horses to put a chevy motor in my twoforty .
350hp/360tq=LS1300hp/260tq=VQ35heartofaskyline wrote:
umm... try more like double the horsepower. plus its lighter
meant more power than a ka. my bad.Salem240 wrote:
350hp/360tq=LS1300hp/260tq=VQ35
More powa yes. Double.....no
Im not saying that I would never do a cross brand swap, or respect it beeing done. Right now I just dont think its that important for my car to have that kind of a swap.
Hey not to be rude but get your facts straight before you start posting them. You most certainly can cross brand engines to vehicle and have it legally done. No tricks, no gimmicks. You just have to know the laws and whats correct. Trust me on this...There is a reason that I have the person that runs the program on speed dial.wantz87 wrote:i agree with 1unar3clipse. the only swap that is close to legal here in cali is the vg/vq. the ref doesn't allow cross brand swaps and they have to be american produced motor. i love the idea of a price efficient vq swap, and soon as i have the cash this is totally going in my car.
I have heard, and this is a big issue for me, that using a standalone management system will disable the motor's variable valve timing system, robbing both power and gas mileage. Almost makes the swap pointless.RustspecS13 wrote:One negative and yet positive is theres so many ways you can go with the management. Standalone, VQ30 ecu, FWD VQ35 ecu, RWD VQ35 ecu, all good options and mean totally different results.
~Alex
new standalones out there can take advantage of 100% stock componants. It is kind of silly to modify the VQ30DE-K ecu to think its a VQ35DE ecu. Its like using your Super NES to emulate your Wii games..simmode1 wrote:
I have heard, and this is a big issue for me, that using a standalone management system will disable the motor's variable valve timing system, robbing both power and gas mileage. Almost makes the swap pointless.
I heard that if you send a '96 Maxima ecu to JWT, they will reflash it so that your vq swap retains full functionality. This is the only way to go IMO.
Now, I could be wrong about this, but this is what I mean about more info needing to be more readily available...
One: Agreed.Two: Not really that important. Exhaust shops can do almost anything.Three: Agreed+Four: Already stated, but that is engine management.Onizuka wrote:One, no modification to chassis or crossmember, you already addressed this. Two, piping solutions; available exhaust and intake kits would go a very long way. Three, wiring: There are mail-in wiring services available for a range of motorswaps in the nissan family except the VQ swap.