How ready would you be to swap in a VQ if more info was public, and cheap kits.

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
irax
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:04 pm
Car: VQ35DER Powered S14.3

Post

Before I really invest money and make a solid business plan I want to know a few things. If the mounts were available to install a VQ30 or VQ35DE into your 240sx and the wiring information was readily available would you purchase it? No core charge, no k-member exchange, using factory motor mount bushings that you can buy at nissan with out having to wait for over seas shipping and a reliable source of information. With prices of good KA's on the rise and SR20DET's are illegal (not interested if your state doesn't care, it is a federal illegal motor) and people getting popped left and right. And If you guys can post any feed back I would really appreciate it. With the prices of VQ just dropping like the stock market and the cost of KA's just doing nothing but rising. If costs are not a factor, then what is ?


irax
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:04 pm
Car: VQ35DER Powered S14.3

Post

Please give me any kind of feed back about the idea of doing the VQ swap.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

I would love to drop in a high compression VQ35DE with Nismo cams extrudabody ITB's like 110Octane's and try to get as close to 300hp+ as possible.

But if the cost is in the ballpark of the higher performing and arguably easier LS1 swap , I can't really justify doing it. That's my make or break. It's got to be relatively simple & cost far less than a v8 swap, since it seems like no one who ever starts a VQ swap ever finishes it...

Am I anywhere near ready to pony up and play? Hells nah! But good luck to ya! I'd love to see even more options up for our cars.

scheffler
Posts: 473
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:10 pm
Car: 92 240 KA-T
92 300zx TT
97 Tahoe
Location: San Diego

Post

Yeah this would have to be a relatively ez swap. I think that the reason most people don't finish there swap is because it becomes really complicated and the cost is fairly comparable to the LS1/V8 swap and with that swap you get more for you buck. The big thing will be bang for you buck. If it cost as much as a V8 or a RB26 swap then i would take either one over the VQ, but if it is as much as a SR and as simple to do as a SR swap maybe a little more complicated then i think more people would consider it.

User avatar
leesredgt
Posts: 3945
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:18 am
Car: 1992 Toyota MR2 N/A
1991 Toyota MR2 Turbo

Post

I would personally rather keep my RB and take my chances with the POPO.

Just my opinion.If i was gonna do another swap it would be a LS1.

User avatar
1unar3clipse
Posts: 1543
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:22 pm
Car: 93 240sx HB, 01 Dodge Dakota SLT

Post

Legality is the major factor for me.

It would greatly catch my interest if the swap was legal and smog-able, CARB is a b****.


User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

leesredgt wrote:I would personally rather keep my RB and take my chances with the POPO.

Just my opinion.If i was gonna do another swap it would be a LS1.
word! if i ever get rid of my sr, im going turbo ls1

User avatar
wantz87
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:12 pm
Car: 1990 240sx/stock v2.0
1998 GMC Sierra c1500
Location: Dover, DE

Post

i agree with 1unar3clipse. the only swap that is close to legal here in cali is the vg/vq. the ref doesn't allow cross brand swaps and they have to be american produced motor. i love the idea of a price efficient vq swap, and soon as i have the cash this is totally going in my car.

User avatar
Salem240
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:27 am
Car: '05 Pathfinder 4X4 SE
'98 240SX SE

Post

I love the linear power and sound of the VQ. I sooo want to do this swap but don't have the funds yet. I just couldn't shove a chevy motor in my 240 even if it has more power. My 2nd choice of course would be going RB. Other than just sticking to KA-T, I would do an SR.

User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

Salem240 wrote: I just couldn't shove a chevy motor in my 240 even if it has more power. My 2nd choice of course would be going RB.
im sorry, but you cant beat the power to weight ratio of an ls1. who cares if its a chevy motor

User avatar
wantz87
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:12 pm
Car: 1990 240sx/stock v2.0
1998 GMC Sierra c1500
Location: Dover, DE

Post

in cali its not only about power to weight, there's that little bastard called california smog check. frosty the snowman has a better chance in the sahara then an ls1 in a nissan passing smog.

User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

^^umm... neither of us live in cali

User avatar
wantz87
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:12 pm
Car: 1990 240sx/stock v2.0
1998 GMC Sierra c1500
Location: Dover, DE

Post

granted but most states are getting ready to move over to the same standards as cali for gov't money. pretty soon all state are going to have the same standards

User avatar
Salem240
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:27 am
Car: '05 Pathfinder 4X4 SE
'98 240SX SE

Post

heartofaskyline wrote:
im sorry, but you cant beat the power to weight ratio of an ls1. who cares if its a chevy motor
UMMM.... .... I do. I'm not concerned enough about having a little extra na horses to put a chevy motor in my twoforty .

User avatar
Ghast
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 5:05 am
Car: 1993 240sx, 2002 Lancer ES, 2006 350z Enthusiast

Post

Personally i do not care for brand to brand swaps. I like nissan with nissan, honda with honda, chevy with chevy. That being said, i can still respect the time, money, and effort put into projects such as them.

I have never seen a VQ in a 240(that actually runs)..... so i don't what to expect nor know how cool or not cool it may be.

Starting up a business right now is going to be hard, best of luck.

One Love,

Ghasty

User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

Salem240 wrote:
UMMM.... .... I do. I'm not concerned enough about having a little extra na horses to put a chevy motor in my twoforty .
umm... try more like double the horsepower. plus its lighter

User avatar
Salem240
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:27 am
Car: '05 Pathfinder 4X4 SE
'98 240SX SE

Post

heartofaskyline wrote:
umm... try more like double the horsepower. plus its lighter
350hp/360tq=LS1300hp/260tq=VQ35

More powa yes. Double.....no

Im not saying that I would never do a cross brand swap, or respect it beeing done. Right now I just dont think its that important for my car to have that kind of a swap.

User avatar
heartofaskyline
Posts: 2103
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 6:28 am
Car: 1992 hatch, 1993 sr20 coupe

Post

Salem240 wrote:
350hp/360tq=LS1300hp/260tq=VQ35

More powa yes. Double.....no

Im not saying that I would never do a cross brand swap, or respect it beeing done. Right now I just dont think its that important for my car to have that kind of a swap.
meant more power than a ka. my bad.

User avatar
RustspecS13
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:30 pm
Car: '74 260z and '88 300zx turbo

Post

Im doing a VQ35 swap in my clean 240 shell this year, taking it slow and doing it right, and fabbing all the parts my self. Then later once its sorted I want my daily 240 to have VQ30 or 35 in it as well, just stockish. I really think I can get a solid 30-35mpg with a q45 ring and pinion.

One of my goals was to consolidate alot of the info thats out there. One negative and yet positive is theres so many ways you can go with the management. Standalone, VQ30 ecu, FWD VQ35 ecu, RWD VQ35 ecu, all good options and mean totally different results.

All in all though, the demand will go up once more people finish their swaps and more info becomes common.

~Alex

sancosys
Posts: 628
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:13 pm

Post

wantz87 wrote:i agree with 1unar3clipse. the only swap that is close to legal here in cali is the vg/vq. the ref doesn't allow cross brand swaps and they have to be american produced motor. i love the idea of a price efficient vq swap, and soon as i have the cash this is totally going in my car.
Hey not to be rude but get your facts straight before you start posting them. You most certainly can cross brand engines to vehicle and have it legally done. No tricks, no gimmicks. You just have to know the laws and whats correct. Trust me on this...There is a reason that I have the person that runs the program on speed dial.

Aaron

irax
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:04 pm
Car: VQ35DER Powered S14.3

Post

please leave the LS1 talk out of my thread, if you never want to swap in an VQ35 then just check the "not interested in swaping in a VQ35" and go on your way please.

User avatar
simmode1
Posts: 7918
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:51 pm
Car: Red '95 S14
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Post

RustspecS13 wrote:One negative and yet positive is theres so many ways you can go with the management. Standalone, VQ30 ecu, FWD VQ35 ecu, RWD VQ35 ecu, all good options and mean totally different results.

~Alex
I have heard, and this is a big issue for me, that using a standalone management system will disable the motor's variable valve timing system, robbing both power and gas mileage. Almost makes the swap pointless.

I heard that if you send a '96 Maxima ecu to JWT, they will reflash it so that your vq swap retains full functionality. This is the only way to go IMO.

Now, I could be wrong about this, but this is what I mean about more info needing to be more readily available...

User avatar
hungryjoseph
Posts: 1465
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:46 pm
Car: s13 with rb25 and s13 with s14sr20

Post

the motor will have competition with the vh45 swap, and the advantged of the vq35 will be its age and weight. and not having to pull apart the transmission.

irax
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:04 pm
Car: VQ35DER Powered S14.3

Post

simmode1 wrote:
I have heard, and this is a big issue for me, that using a standalone management system will disable the motor's variable valve timing system, robbing both power and gas mileage. Almost makes the swap pointless.

I heard that if you send a '96 Maxima ecu to JWT, they will reflash it so that your vq swap retains full functionality. This is the only way to go IMO.

Now, I could be wrong about this, but this is what I mean about more info needing to be more readily available...
new standalones out there can take advantage of 100% stock componants. It is kind of silly to modify the VQ30DE-K ecu to think its a VQ35DE ecu. Its like using your Super NES to emulate your Wii games..

Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

In my mind, the only thing that will make the VQ35DE a viable swap replacement for the SR20/CA18/RB20/RB25/turbo-ing the KA24 are three primary criteria. One, no modification to chassis or crossmember, you already addressed this. Two, piping solutions; available exhaust and intake kits would go a very long way. Three, wiring: There are mail-in wiring services available for a range of motorswaps in the nissan family except the VQ swap.

Basically, it has to be an affordable, bolt-in affair or it will be a difficult to compete with the other swaps.

irax
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:04 pm
Car: VQ35DER Powered S14.3

Post

well number one and two are not going to be a problem. Number three won't be a problem as all the information i have accrued will be shared for free.

User avatar
DMan II-40
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:49 am
Car: 1995 240SX SE
Location: East Bay Area, CA

Post

Onizuka wrote:One, no modification to chassis or crossmember, you already addressed this. Two, piping solutions; available exhaust and intake kits would go a very long way. Three, wiring: There are mail-in wiring services available for a range of motorswaps in the nissan family except the VQ swap.
One: Agreed.Two: Not really that important. Exhaust shops can do almost anything.Three: Agreed+Four: Already stated, but that is engine management.

User avatar
wantz87
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:12 pm
Car: 1990 240sx/stock v2.0
1998 GMC Sierra c1500
Location: Dover, DE

Post

i wanna know about the ballpark price you are thinking for the kit.

TheFallOfJeffrey
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:06 am
Car: 1990 240SX

Post

If I had the funds to do it, I would in a heart beat. I think it would be aweosme to do beause so many people don't finish it. It would be really cool to have one that was completed and runs.

I agree, figure out a ball park price for your kit and everything.


burntricer
Posts: 1126
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:51 am
Car: 90 S13 SR20DET Redtop

Post

i agree, the possibilities are there, but really if you have to buy the motor, plus a swap kit, the market is very limited

i mean, i cant rationailise buying a motor, swap kit, and wiring serivce....i personally would stick with the sr, for ease of swap, ease of power etc...


Return to “240sx General Discussion”