I should patent increasing the total displacement of an engine with the goal of creating more power

I'M GONNA PATENT THE PROCESS EATING, you're effed world, all your money are belong to me.

Hi again Rick,

So, should I have built said system and decided I wanted to mount the assorted pieces (oil pump, lines, turbo, intake, etc) in places that are unconventional or not directly associated with STS method, (not to mention that I don't plan on selling my method for my own personal gain), how is it that I am infringing a patent? Who says I didn't decide to keep my muffler and put the turbo directly after my catalytic converter? What if my intercooler happens to be on the top of my engine or under the chassis itself. There isn't any consistency with that fabled setup versus STS. Its similar to copy writing a recipe. I can change the amount of heat used, or add an ingredient, after which, it is my own.

FYI, on your patent it reads "to a pressure side of an oiling system and an oil outlet." Last I checked, there was only THE pressure side. You might want to get that changed for legality's sake. Also, you may be in infringement of other patent or copy rights where individual owners (or manufactures for that matter), decide to use an oil pump for lubricate their turbo. If you are getting that scrupulous, go inform the Focus guys, they love using pumps to ensure their investment doesn't over heat.

Finally, it is lovely that you guys managed to pick out the smaller person, who may or may not have designed a system for themselves, and in a few words or less give an inkling to legal action. Regardless of your more friendly invitation to help with engineering. Furthermore, it is aggravating to think that I could possibly pose even the slightest nuisance (or competition) to your corporation. I have no monetary gain planned, no intention to sell or distribute, and enough sense to know the afore mentioned points.

Thanks for your time, and do consider changing that wording on the patent.

Ray

I'll be in VA this weekend, probably with little access to a computer. There will be little new news unless you guys link this around; So feel free do do with all of this you guys like- I'm NOT going to patent it.

BTW, that thread was deleted on LS1 - STS is a sponsor there...

TEAM NICO: 137,000 Nissan enthusiasts strong.

NICOclub on Facebook

AZhitman on MySpace

Love it here? Add a link to NICOclub to your site!

This site dedicated to the memory of Stacey Lynn Childs 1970-2007

I'll do my best to post again if I receive anything over the weekend.

LOL *cough*

My vert might be in trouble in a couple months then
Think I'll mail some pictures to them...

KA-T why settle for anything less?

if you had...did you talk to them? then I could sorta understand the logic behind sending the first email (although I still disagree with the content).

if you hadn't ever heard of them...way to go in losing your butts a lot of potential customers by being douchebags.

Their whole attitude is a lot like Hennesy's was before he imploded. Always sad to see another member of the brotherhood trying to scam us

Truth is Treason in the Kingdom of Lies - Ron Paul

P.S.guys heres the loop hole
embodiment, the method of installing the turbocharger system includes removing an existing muffler from the vehicle and mounting the turbocharger at or near the location of the existing muffler.

dont remove the muffler and they dont have a leg to stand on

Modified by paulie240sxr at 9:18 PM 3/22/2007

bah, whatever, this thread is giving them more exposure than they will ever deserve.

Quote, originally posted by AZhitman »

BTW, that thread was deleted on LS1 - STS is a sponsor there...

Was I the only one who broke out laughing upon reading that?

It'd be funny if it weren't so absurd and pathetic.

Quote, originally posted by Katapl »

Was I the only one who broke out laughing upon reading that?

Nope.

And now this thread is the number one reason to do a remote mount turbo. I never really liked the idea before.

and i laughed hard when he said they deleted that thread.

Yeah, they replace the rear muffler with it. It's easier to mount in the sense of not having to mess with a turbo manifold and they claim the large charge piping has an intercooler effect and a bunch of other stuff that's probably on their website.

The major issue is water+hot exhuast housing and I think it takes a bit longer to spool.

How does this happen?

Freedoms lost are seldom restored.

"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have" Thomas Jefferson

"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms . . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." Cesare Beccaria, 1767 (Later quoted by Thomas Jefferson)

Quote, originally posted by redtop91 »

Oh God. Google that for pics. At work. I lose.

mannnn... something told me when i seen that word. "don't google image it" then i read your responce.. which SHOULD have been a second warning.. to not google image it.

...yeh.. i regret it now

tell them to get ****ed from me too.

Quote, originally posted by redtop91 »

Mmmmmm. Lag.

Engine
Type: Twin-turbo V10
Displacement cu in (cc): 301 (4941)
Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 810(604) / n.a.
Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 733(994) / n.a.
Redline at RPM: n.a.
Brakes & Tires
Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc
Tires F-R: R20
Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior Dimensions & Weight
Length × Width × Height in: 191.1 × 72.7 × 74.3
Weight lb (kg): 4033 (1830)
Performance
Acceleration 0-60 mph s: 3.6
Top Speed mph (km/h): 240 (386)

i'll put with up some lag for 810HP
.

Modified by rexhunta at 7:50 AM 3/25/2007

weeeeaak lol

Pete, I'd give ANYTHING to have you drive that out to STS's shop and do a big fat smoky donut in their parking lot.