factory rated crank hp is 145 on the SOHC.TannerDanger wrote: the fact that its a single cam and it puts out about 140 ( i think that was the number)
I think you are severely overestimating the D16...TannerDanger wrote:reminds me too much of my civics D16Y8. swap for a s13 right?
GOOD FOR YOU!! Now you can enjoy the pleasures of a real sports car, as opposed to a grocery-getter wannabe!!TannerDanger wrote:So my deal is, I'm looking into what my next car is gunna be, and I was thinking of getting out of the Honda game and moving into RWD and I've always loved the S13.
In other words, you knew your car couldn't beat anything on the road with it's paltry 90FWHP (if that!) So instead you hung out in parking lots using zip ties and colored hose covers to make your wiring harness look pretty, while a couple of buddies with their own slow cars spent time changing ultra white Ebay light bulbs every 5,000 miles. HON DUUUUUH!!!TannerDanger wrote:I'm looking to drift, not publicly obviously (im one of those rare honda drivers that only raced and drove like a a$$ in vacent lots and tracks), and I am not too sure where to start.
Dude, for even only 8K, if you do most of the work yourself you can have a car making 400 flywheel horsepower and looking good. In fact, for about 5-6K you can have a car that's sr-swapped already.TannerDanger wrote:After the summer I'm gunna make enough to have about $8-12,000 I wanna spend on a car/slight build,
If you're worried about money, BUILD THE KA. For the money you'll spend on even a cheapter SR20 build, you could have a built block KA putting 350HP (and around 320 TQ!!) to the wheels, which is quite a bit in that 2600 lb car. That's C5 z06 territory. KA-T.org has a guy putting 500+ to the ground in an unbuilt block KA24DE-T. The SR20 is a great platform, but now that the aftermarket has warmed up to the KA's potential, it's really the way to go, especially for drifting! BTW, stay away from the RB26 swap -- you're too poor. Remember, you're talking about a great deal more than an element filter and glass-pack muffler on your VROOM VROOM Honda. You're now talking about REAL cars with REAL maintenance. an RB26 will cost you a ton of money even after the swap is done. Besides, once the swap is done, KAT and SR20 owners will be smoking you left and right. Dollar for dollar, the RB26 is not a good deal. Go that route once you've got 30+ in the bank and can afford to build it, otherwise you'll have an expensive and complicated effin project car that only makes about 420 to the wheels. RB25 and RB20 are pointless swaps now that the KA (almost same displacement as RB25) is well supported now. Trust me -- CAR=2500, motor/transmission build=3000, T3/T4 hybrid turbo and a 3 inch intercooler=600.TannerDanger wrote:was thinking SR20DET is the obvious answer, but is a RB26DET too impractical and put me too far over my head
Why? so it can look like and old Honda wannabe? Maybe you should use some red electrical tape and make a wicked cool racing stripe or two also. How about a Supra-style spoiler on your hatch? Seriously though, why would you want to make an old car look even older? Why not spend that few hundred bucks on a PAINT JOB, or some dyno time?TannerDanger wrote:-and maybe a JDM silvia front end conversion
You make an excellent point. Wait, you didn't make any points, since you said NOTHING to substantiate this. So I guess if your goal was just to see your post on the forum - GOAL ACHIEVED! SCORE ONE FOR YOU!White Comet wrote:^ some of your points arent very good
Apples to oranges, man... You're talking about a car that's grossly underpowered vs a car that's just underpowered. The old KA24E rattletrap made 135HP and 160 TQ. HP-wise, it's similar numbers to a D16 with intake, headers, and exhaust. the TQ numbers, however, destroy the weak econobox D16 -- it's about 50 ft/lbs more. Wanna boost the iron block? GO AHEAD.. wanna boost that D16 block? Take it out, clean it, sleeve it, and then boost it. Then laugh maniacly when you hear "WHEEEEEE, BLUB BLUB BLUB BLUB CHIRP CHIRP CHIRP chirppp WHEEEEE!!" every time you upshift... just as that bolt-on 240 with less horsepower lets off the gas after walking you....TannerDanger wrote:I know swap wise that I dont want to stick with the KA. the fact that its a single cam and it puts out about 140 ( i think that was the number) reminds me too much of my civics D16Y8. From what I understand the SR20 is the most realistic swap for a s13 right?
Let's see, aside from the lack of a good 15:1 LB:HP ratio, considered by many to be a nice ratio for an entry-level sports car, these cars are well-balanced, rear-wheel drive, with good steering feel, supportive seats, low center of gravity, decent suspension design and in many cases a pre-existing LSD. What exactly else does a "real sports car" need? And you must be blind, because a stock Honda civic looks anything BUT sporty...danielsan wrote:CHEMAO.. your points are not very good. my going from a honda to nissan myself i think 240s are pretty fun cars because of the rear wheel drive. a 240 is a not a true sports car its a "sporty" car just like honda.
It's doable bro...d!ck wrote:$3,500 covered your suspension, wheels, tires AND brakes? either civic shxt is cheap and you're headed for a rude awakening when buying parts for your $240 or that was bargain bin stuff.
of course i made a point, your attempts at t3h funnay were not amusing. its not really cheaper to build a kat over swapping an sr, and without elaborating on how built you want teh ka-t, you cant determine which one costs more. theyre both good engines and in most cases theyre both cost effective.chemao wrote:
You make an excellent point. Wait, you didn't make any points, since you said NOTHING to substantiate this. So I guess if your goal was just to see your post on the forum - GOAL ACHIEVED! SCORE ONE FOR YOU!
theres no way i'd call a civic a sporty car, but a 240sx isnt a sports car either, and its rare to find one with vlsdchemao wrote:
Let's see, aside from the lack of a good 15:1 LB:HP ratio, considered by many to be a nice ratio for an entry-level sports car, these cars are well-balanced, rear-wheel drive, with good steering feel, supportive seats, low center of gravity, decent suspension design and in many cases a pre-existing LSD. What exactly else does a "real sports car" need? And you must be blind, because a stock Honda civic looks anything BUT sporty...
White Comet wrote:
theres no way i'd call a civic a sporty car, but a 240sx isnt a sports car either, and its rare to find one with vlsd
i woudl totally agree but my statement is that civics arent sports carsVirginiaPS13 wrote:My Type R Integra was way more "sportier" than any 240 I have ever driven.
A KA motor built with rods, rings, pistons, connecting rods, valves, retainers, springs, cams, and a valve job will run you about 3 grand, which is only a little bit more than a red top swap. This build would pretty much ensure you don't grenade your motor, and should be safe for 500+HP on a good tune.White Comet wrote:of course i made a point, your attempts at t3h funnay were not amusing. its not really cheaper to build a kat over swapping an sr, and without elaborating on how built you want teh ka-t, you cant determine which one costs more. theyre both good engines and in most cases theyre both cost effective.
So what is your definition of a sports car then? You say it's not a sports car, but neglect to state why you feel that way. Seems pretty subjective, to me!White Comet wrote:theres no way i'd call a civic a sporty car, but a 240sx isnt a sports car either, and its rare to find one with vlsd