so in the end you put in $60k; hmmm say hello to M5driftingmy240sx wrote:i know a shop that did a rb26 into a g35 and only ended up costing (due to many upgrades) 25k. what are you lookg for power wise? ever conside the twin turbo route. the vq motor is what the gt-r motor is based on (3.8 tt)
Yes, you just need a rb bell housing to mate with the z32 transmission.StricNyne wrote:WHAT ! z33 trans works on a RB!!!!
wtf "intelligent awd" sounds like you just read a bunch of internet/magazine **** (you're referring to the new gtr). it's so funny. all the people I know that owns an sr20 want the rb. stock block rb26 put out over 500hp, while you have to do a fully rebuilt on the sr to get close to that. and the rb26 is straight p0rn. how much you know about parts for the rb!! it's everywhere, not sure what you're talking about.Rare_f8 wrote:Don't get an rb because you think it will give you the legend of the Skyline.. rbs are overrated, you have to understand that skylines are intellegently AWD... and if rb were the end all be all... why isn't nissan pulling the rb in the new GTR... I am sure you heard that they can make up to 1,200 hp, but the reality is that it is not easy to do and very very expenisive to reach the benchmark.
BTW what do you want to do with the car? Drift? Might I suggest the SR20DET if you are hungry for a swap, after modifying the organs of it you will have a platform that bring you 300 to 500 hp which is more than enough for less you would pay to have the rb modded. And your overall weight will be greatly reduced.
And to finish my rambling... whats wrong with the VG30DETT? It has more than enough power, and you can get a complete engine for the ballpark of $2,500 minus shipping.
BTW the rb weighs more than the VQ.
-Rare
Dan,BoostsFed wrote: wtf "intelligent awd" sounds like you just read a bunch of internet/magazine **** (you're referring to the new gtr). it's so funny. all the people I know that owns an sr20 want the rb. stock block rb26 put out over 500hp, while you have to do a fully rebuilt on the sr to get close to that. and the rb26 is straight p0rn. how much you know about parts for the rb!! it's everywhere, not sure what you're talking about.
Nope, all my posts been here...the engine is overrated, because the amount of people who wish to have it for only the reason of belief of being the best. Nissan don't use it anymore for another(maybe due to harder emission laws, actual reason not determined). I am a person of application, and engine type is all about application. So don't get me wrong, I like the rb too.eh? wrote:What evidence do you have that the RB26 is overrated? Sounds like you probably frequent the Drifting forums..
So what if the R35 uses a VQ based VR engine? Three of the greatest cars Nissan ever produced had the RB26. That says enough. Why bring back an engine that went out of production years ago?
*IMO* Nissan is foolish to give the GTR the same engine "base" as the Altima. Not to mention bringing it over as a Nissan and not an infiniti...
I disagree with the oil feed/drain and CAS issues.Rare_f8 wrote:
But not be offended that I say overrated, it is a good engine, very strong bottem end. But it has it's fair share of issues, like the block is long, so the coolant is hot before it has chance to cool the remaining cylinders. The block is also very heavy, the entire block is made from cast iron, 6 whole cylinder lengths of iron. Between the oil feed being too big or return too small of the head of the engine, oil stays up there during high revs causing oil starvation. The CAS system is belt driven, and within, the CAS disc has 360 ticks which can be easily messed up with a slight flex of the belt. Even though nissan has a fix within the ecu, which isn't nessacary the best solution and can result so other issues. AEM sells disc with fewer ticks to allow their ecu work with the engine, you can also use a sensor from the crank as primary and the CAS as reset. There is more to the list and there are fixes to these issues, but the evidence is, it's simply a motor, what you do to it is what counts.
Ok first to make clear.. the it's R36... because the japanese came out with r35 skyline... which is our G35.... Going with a VQ, is most likely manufacturability... they only have to make one kind of v-6 for all cars, making parts for each different platform the close to or the same. The rb26 is not a FWD platform, making manufacturing time comsuming to make compared the the VQ.
And yes I agree about "base" model
edit: yes because it all one line, and I was like what the heck!Rare_f8 wrote:there are fixes to these issues, but the evidence is, it's simply a motor, what you do to it is what counts.