When evaluating alternative con rods for a performance application, knowing where Rods typically fail and why is beneficial and those area is where you focus scrutiny. Where the beam spreads out the big end and in some applications depending on piston weight and RPM, just under the small end.elwesso wrote:either way, im not sure id want to put thing tiny little rod inside my motor... just throwing it out there.
I really like the method in your madness, (matches mine). In true Datsun/Nissan form, researching the resources already available to achieve a fun attainable realistic goal on a modest budget.Mettler wrote:Thanks for the info BRAAP!
The reason I was investigating this is because US$1000+ for aftermarket pistons... is simply not an affordable method. It'd end up costing around $NZ2k to get a set over here (the cost of two entire VH engines), and I'm sure none of you guys would throw US$1000+ into it without feeling the burn.
This is why I want to find a rod compatible with the factory VQ30DET pistons... as it should be much cheaper to buy a set, and will undoubtedly make the motor safe as to boost up and get around 800HP without popping. Think about it, we always see examples of factory boosting Nissan engines with bolt ons, making big numbers on the stock internals. SR20s over 400HP at the flywheel on stock pistons.. Have seen RB engines making over 600HP without popping any pistons etc...
So it's not like we'd be placing any additional strain on VQ pistons if used... undoubtedly they're of the same quality design and hypereutectic alloy construction as other modern Nissan boost pistons, and capable of holding their own with significant boost thrown at them.
Having googled further, it seems the piston list I found stating 30.4mm is somewhat 'unique' in its VQ30DET compression height listing, and VQ30 pistons in fact have a 30.7mm compression height (as confirmed on VQ forums).
This makes the required rod length actually 148.3mm... so if anyone has any ideas, post em up! I'm fairly confident we could build a safe 100HP per cylinder combo using a combination of stock rods & pistons from other Nissan motors... it's just a case of finding ones to suit.
mtcookson wrote:Hey Paul! What brings you over this way? I'm mtcookson over at HybridZ.
Ezekial wrote:factory conrods are finefactory pistons WITH 68 ABDC closing intake valves are of adequate compression
i dont see the problem
run 98RON fuel and a decent aftermarket ecu
THERE IS NO NEED FOR RODS OR PISTONS
Use race fuel ?BRAAP wrote: ↑Sat Mar 08, 2008 6:46 amEzekial wrote:factory conrods are finefactory pistons WITH 68 ABDC closing intake valves are of adequate compression
i dont see the problem
run 98RON fuel and a decent aftermarket ecu
THERE IS NO NEED FOR RODS OR PISTONS
I have no doubt your scenario would hold true, but that scenario is not our scenario, hence THE NEED FOR ALTERNATIVE RODS!
Our highest octane available here in the states is 91 (R+M)/2, which is more equivalent to your 95. In a few locations here, there is claim of 93 (R+M)/2 being available, though not where I live.
Intake valve closure point for our custom ground cams has yet to be determined, though we may take advantage of the longer piston dwell at TDC from our longer than stock rod/stroke ratio, when determining our overall cam specs.
The main and most critical reason for alternative rods is this engine will have internal modifications that necessitates the need for a different rod and possibly piston combo than the OE VH, hence the “skunk works” project mentioned above. Our focus for this project is something other than max effort performance.