Wtf????

[StrangeLove]

i<3drifting, I would suggest not posting again til you are ready to present a valid agruement, your current one is

Quote »im glad bush doesn't care about the un, they can go **** themselves. they where onto saddam for 10 years and didn't do **** to stop the genocide, im just gald we have a pres with the balls to stand up to those ****ers[/quote]

Thats not going to cut it...

[Drift Machine]

his pursuit of terrorism has been excellenthis response after 9/11 says it all, hes not gonna take **** from anybody, unlike that ***** *** little ***** john kerry.

Umm no it hasn't. He hasn't pursued any terrorists other then Osama. He has left England intact. Do you even know of anything happening in the world? Have you heard of "The Troubles" that plaque Northern Ireland? Where Irish Republicans are held in Long Kesh prison(aka University of Freedom) just becuase they have differetn political beliefs. Or how the English go around terrorizing catholics in South Armagh. Until he addresses terrorlst issues outside the middle east, he is not handling the terrorists. He is only going farther with his 'crusade'.

[BuudWeizErr]

ok... http://www.sillbeer.com/forum/

lets all go there and argue. no mods, no word censors, just pure debate.

continue this there, Admins don't want political threads here, and I understand that.

[ilovedrifting]

i never said the previous president was responsible for the current economy, clinton was a good president and he handled the economy pretty damn good, for a democrat. the terrorists are the ones responsible.And bush has done things for medicaire, a year or two ago, he approved a prescription drug plan for the elderly to get free drugs if they can't afford them

you are absolutily correct terrorism has no country, but the leaders of certain countries are terrorlst themselves and must be stopped

[StrangeLove]

Saddam had nothing to do with terrorlst! Hell, they never helped each other with anything. Saddam didn't give weapons to osama (the united states did)

Quote »And bush has done things for medicaire, a year or two ago, he approved a prescription drug plan for the elderly to get free drugs if they can't afford them[/quote]

Uhhhh my grandmother is paying more for her perscriptions than ever

what about the 4 million+ people that lost their health insurance?

[w1ngzer0]

ugh. i won't and will not vote for kerry or bush. Why vote for 2 evils?

[StrangeLove]

Because Kerry is not evil

So, your basically saying that the money spent on iraq was the best place for the money to be spent?

I say we should of used it to improve schools, help the homeless, and overall improve the living coniditons of the united states

[BuudWeizErr]

i <3drifting... start a thread... i'm not going to post in this thread anymore with any points..

http://www.sillbeer.com/forum/

[ilovedrifting]

i never said saddam gave weapons to osama, he is a terrorlst for oppresing his country with fear and slaughtering the innocent who disagreed with him. not to mention the gassing of kurdish areas 90's. and drug companies are responsible for drug prices. thats what happens in a free market economy.If you want free medical **** move to canada

[StrangeLove]

Quote »If you want free medical **** move to canada[/quote]

You are such a great human! only careing about yourself!

Quote »he is a terrorlst for oppresing his country with fear and slaughtering the innocent who disagreed with him. not to mention the gassing of kurdish areas 90's.[/quote]

So Saddam was the only person doing that? I think not buddy! Check out africa, MASS GENOCIDE is going on there, MILLIONS of innocent people dying EVERY month, that situation is so much worse than iraq ever was!

[StrangeLove]

no longer posting in this thread because I just pwned the crap out of you

[w1ngzer0]

Because Kerry is not evil

So, your basically saying that the money spent on iraq was the best place for the money to be spent?

I say we should of used it to improve schools, help the homeless, and overall improve the living coniditons of the united states

kerry is a jerk and edwards is a liar. 2 great people to run a country NOT. Then we have bush the simple minded monkey ooo ooo aaa aaa *here you go georgy have a nice banana*

[ilovedrifting]

You are such a great human! only careing about yourself!



So Saddam was the only person doing that? I think not buddy! Check out africa, MASS GENOCIDE is going on there, MILLIONS of innocent people dying EVERY month, that situation is so much worse than iraq ever was!

i think we should also go to africa, but im not the one in charge, caring only about myself, ummm. noi care about other people just not enough for the government to take more money out of my paycheck so your grandmother can prolong her life another year

[w1ngzer0]

i think we should also go to africa, but im not the one in charge, caring only about myself, ummm. noi care about other people just not enough for the government to take more money out of my paycheck so your grandmother can prolong her life another year

lol. I agree about the grandma part. My grandparents go off of their retirement fund they earned. My grandfather is a WW2 vet and my grandma is just... my grandma :pface

No SS for them

[ilovedrifting]

w1ngzero come on over to http://sillbeer.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=13#13

[The Mic]

ehh ill chime in w/o looking ........

The Bush team ran in 2000 on the idea that CEOs could better run the country, they told us the CEOs would be more efficient -and they always are, at robbing and fooling people.

Flip flopping is good, especially in these times. heres a piece of advice bush supporters can take to the bank:

People who don’t change their views aren’t smart people

[BuudWeizErr]

seriously guys... political threads won't last on nico

http://www.sillbeer.com/forum/

[ilovedrifting]

ehh ill chime in w/o looking ........

The Bush team ran in 2000 on the idea that CEOs could better run the country, they told us the CEOs would be more efficient -and they always are, at robbing and fooling people.

Flip flopping is good, especially in these times. heres a piece of advice bush supporters can take to the bank:

People who don’t change their views aren’t smart people

its fine to change your views just not changing them everyday

john kerry wouldn't know what to do in the event of war, i trust bush's judgement to get the job done

[MaineExport]

And this thread has been allowed to go on because.................?

NICO COMMUNITY > POLITICAL BANTERING

Trust me... I'd love to join in and shut SOME of you little ingrates up... but we can't go there!!

[BuudWeizErr]

And this thread has been allowed to go on becuase.................?

NICO COMMUNITY > POLITICAL BANTERING

Trust me... I'd love to join in and shut SOME of you little ingrates up... but we can't go there!!

then come to mine.. http://www.sillbeer.com/forum/

no car talk, just politics... and no moderation.

[vicki]

ugh. i won't and will not vote for kerry or bush. Why vote for 2 evils?

And what exactly is the difference between won't and will not vote? I am AWEFULLY confused. Please, excuse my ignorance.

[Jesda]

Another political thread.

Liberals think Kerry is a good guy and conservatives think Bush is a good guy.

WOW THATS FREAKING AMAZING! I havent heard this one before! Oh, such an interesting and new topic to debate!

Lets get on with our lives now. If you're still stuck on politics, head over to http://www.ircpolitics.org -- I moderate there and hurt people's feelings.

[w1ngzer0]

And what exactly is the difference between won't and will not vote? I am AWEFULLY confused. Please, excuse my ignorance.

won't = would not (if someone forced me to i would rather die)will not (freedom to do it at my "will"

hope that helps

[The Mic]

And what exactly is the difference between won't and will not vote? I am AWEFULLY confused. Please, excuse my ignorance.

I dont think anyone should feel obligated to vote if they dont like any of the candidates. Lets see how far down the voting percentage will go before the people in the parties wake up and realize "hey somethings gotta change because no ones voting for us"

(young) people shouldn't be encouraged to vote (not discouraged), especially those without any accompanying message about learning enough before hand to make that an informed vote, like me

[vicki]

won't = would not (if someone forced me to i would rather die)will not (freedom to do it at my "will"

hope that helps

Maybe I was asleep during English class but would not = WOULDN'T

and will not = WON'T

[vicki]

I dont think anyone should feel obligated to vote if they dont like any of the candidates. Lets see how far down the voting percentage will go before the people in the parties wake up and realize "hey somethings gotta change because no ones voting for us"

(young) people shouldn't be encouraged to vote (not discouraged), especially those without any accompanying message about learning enough before hand to make that an informed vote, like me

Haha. You totally missed the sarcasm in my post.

[w1ngzer0]

Maybe I was asleep during English class but would not = WOULDN'T

and will not = WON'T

blah blah evil one. blah blah

[MaineExport]

then come to mine.. http://www.sillbeer.com/forum/

no car talk, just politics... and no moderation.

Haha... no offense... but after perusing some of the subject matter in the two active discussions... no thanks. That is hardly a place for open-minded, intellectually stimulating conversation. We could throw around baseless hypotheses all day and it would change nobody's opinions.

The problem with a site like that... is that it is only going to attract diametrically opposed "extremists" with no intention of learning, listening, or adopting any opinion contrary to their own. When you get extremely conflicting points of view without the input of the "middle ground"... it becomes a pointless shouting match with no possibility of a reasonable conclusion.

I'd love to contribute as someone with a "middle-of-the-road" point of view... the problem is I tend to become less neutral and lean more towards the side lacking adequate representation. In this case I'd be feverishly defending I<3Drifting's argument!

[The Mic]

ah now i see it =]

but thats what i think, even though i have a register to vote link in my sig

[Jesda]

If you havent registered to vote yet, I strongly discourage you from doing so.

Why? It shows you dont care enough to put yourself on the list of voters, which also shows that you dont care enough to follow the issues and candidates in an attentive way that would make your decision moderately informed.