

I met with one yesterday...Fits the exact description: A small car with front wheel drive, slide for "50 meters"(as the driver said) before they hit me on the red lights..and as you can see the roads, it wasn't summer!minibus4 wrote: You'r main safety hazard will be the idiots with front wheel drive smaller cars [...] that think they can drive just as stupidly as they can in the Summer and refuse to be cautious.

So this guy allegedly slid nearly 55 yards? And did he mention this in front of the authorities?slide for "50 meters"(as the driver said) before they hit me on the red lights

Workers comp sucks. Im on workers comp right nowImStricken wrote:i hope someone measure or at least estimated or logged the distance of the skid-marks. from my experience in accident reconstruction; the vehicles weight, and the distance it traveled- that can predict the vehicles speed at the point the brakes were applied. if the person was hauling a**, then that weighs much more on the pain aspect. because insurances are gonna wanna deny any medical claims immediately.
take R1's advice and talk to a lawyer/doctor. im going through a lot of pain right now. was a bouncer at a night club and a HUGE brawl broke out. after fighting it out with a large/drunk patron, and taking him down to the grown- i tore my shoulder. looking at surgery. guess what- workman's comp is trying to attach to anything just to deny my claims. im still in pain(hence why i cant do much to the cars/bikes. some days are worse than others)
IDK if ther's as an event data recorder in the other driver's vehicle, but I'm fairly certain it's standard on our Rogue's. This will provide some useful data.ImStricken wrote:i hope someone measure or at least estimated or logged the distance of the skid-marks. from my experience in accident reconstruction; the vehicles weight, and the distance it traveled- that can predict the vehicles speed at the point the brakes were applied. if the person was hauling a**, then that weighs much more on the pain aspect. because insurances are gonna wanna deny any medical claims immediately.
take R1's advice and talk to a lawyer/doctor. im going through a lot of pain right now. was a bouncer at a night club and a HUGE brawl broke out. after fighting it out with a large/drunk patron, and taking him down to the grown- i tore my shoulder. looking at surgery. guess what- workman's comp is trying to attach to anything just to deny my claims. im still in pain(hence why i cant do much to the cars/bikes. some days are worse than others)
Ok, @ work using my Sony tablet so I'm limited. First, don't go into end times panic mode, as they're mostly benign and activate to collect data during an accident, being triggered by a collision. There are other onboard systems that record stuff, But that's primarily for system performance and maintenance.followingnfront wrote:The "black box"? I didnt know our Rogues had the "black box"! I dont like things like that... And no, Im 99% sure that Scion doesnt have one.
Most cars have had EDR's for awhile now. 96% of 2013 models have EDR's.followingnfront wrote:The "black box"? I didnt know our Rogues had the "black box"! I dont like things like that... And no, Im 99% sure that Scion doesnt have one.
This vehicle is equipped with an Event Data Recorder (EDR). The main purpose of an EDR is to record, in certain crash or near crash-like situations, such as an air bag deployment or hitting a road obstacle, data that will assist in understanding how a vehicle’s systems performed.
The EDR is designed to record data related to vehicle dynamics and safety systems for a short period of time, typically 30 seconds or less. The EDR in this vehicle is designed to record such data as:
- How various systems in your vehicle were operating;
- Whether or not the driver and passenger safety belts were buckled/fastened;
- How far (if at all) the driver was depressing the accelerator and/or brake pedal; and,
- How fast the vehicle was traveling.
- Sounds are not recorded.
These data can help provide a better understanding of the circumstances in which crashes and injuries occur.
NOTE: EDR data are recorded by your vehicle only if a nontrivial crash situation occurs; no data are recorded by the EDR under normal driving conditions and no personal data (e.g. name, gender, age and crash location) are recorded.
However, other parties, such as law enforcement, could combine the EDR data with the type of personally identifying data routinely acquired during a crash investigation.
To read data recorded by an EDR, special equipment is required and access to the vehicle or the EDR is needed. In addition to the vehicle manufacturer and NISSAN dealer, other parties, such as law enforcement, that have the special equipment, can read the information if they have access to the vehicle or the EDR. EDR data will only be accessed with the consent of the vehicle owner or lessee or as otherwise required or permitted by law.
I know what its used for.... And I dont like it. No end times panic going on here... I dislike being monitored... Even in an accident. Its not the biggest deal in the world but it is excessive in my opinion. Just another way for insurance companies to stiff you and all-around too "big brothery" for my liking. I feel that Im entitled to that opinion.Rogue One wrote:Ok, @ work using my Sony tablet so I'm limited. First, don't go into end times panic mode, as they're mostly benign and activate to collect data during an accident, being triggered by a collision. There are other onboard systems that record stuff, But that's primarily for system performance and maintenance.followingnfront wrote:The "black box"? I didnt know our Rogues had the "black box"! I dont like things like that... And no, Im 99% sure that Scion doesnt have one.
only if they subpoena you and your evidenceminibus4 wrote:A little off topic but, if you have a dashcam, do you have to turn the footage into the insurance company in the case of an accident?

Also, make sure the frame where the hitch bolts to is ok,We have the trailer hitch as well which reduced the damage on my Rogue.
Well you're partially correct. If you stop suddenly for no apparent reason, then you're considered at fault and can even be charged.darylzero wrote:Qashqai don't worry your insurance won't go up. She hit you. At least here in the States the person who gets rear ended is NEVER at fault. Ok never say never but it's literally 99.9% not your fault.
Also, make sure the frame where the hitch bolts to is ok,We have the trailer hitch as well which reduced the damage on my Rogue.
The Rear End Car Accident http://nylawthoughts.com/2011/04/26/the ... -accident/http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/ ... 29535.html
Example
Bob was in a car accident in which he stopped short and was hit from behind. If the other person had been 100% at fault, Bob's medical bills and lost income would entitle him to $1,000. However, the police accident report notes that Bob stopped short because one of a group of children next to a school looked as if he was going to dart into the street. The insurance company for the person whose car hit Bob from behind points out that Bob should have been going slowly enough in the school area to be able to stop without having to slam on his brakes.
In this case, not going slowly enough may have made Bob about 10% negligent. Because of this, the person who hit him is not liable to Bob for the full compensation of $1,000, but for only $900 (100% liability minus Bob's 10% liability = 90% liability).