OriginalWheelman wrote:Let the rotary die already. It's the least efficient gas engine ever made, except the one time I lit a gas can on fire and it moved a little.
These were pretty much my thoughts when I saw the "SkyActiv-R" moniker.
In an age of increasingly stringent government demands where engines are getting smaller to boost efficiency and reduce emissions, Corvettes have cylinder deactivation to skew results, the muscle era arch-rivals Mustang & Camaro are being offered in a four cylinder force-fed variety with Porsche's Boxster & Cayman wunder-twins losing two cylinders and adding a turbocharger in the near future as well. Even Porsche's parent company setting a sterling example by cheating on the EPA exam. It's hard to believe that Mazda is going with, what has been in the past, the automotive equivalent of the baked bean campfire scene in Blazing Saddles...
...a lot of consumption and a lot of expulsion.
I'm interested to see the technology that's going to enable the rotary to wear a SkyActiv badge. Because of the size and output of the rotary the one place I always thought was a possible strong point was as a secondary engine for a (primarily) battery vehicle in order to add some cruising range and flexibility.
Mazda did have to do something though. Despite Palmer's enthusiast comment Nissan has been on top for a while with the GT-R's performance by default, no other Japanese carmaker has a similar offering. The rumours of Toyota's Supra have been swirling for a while now and then there's Honda's not quite fact and not quite fiction NSX (presumably) on the horizon. Mazda had to offer up something just to keep themselves in the game.