I think you're messing with me at this point.Razi wrote:Hence, no hybrids in the USA.
I thought we went through this?
It is fun though...
I think you're messing with me at this point.Razi wrote:Hence, no hybrids in the USA.
I thought we went through this?
I'm not sure that it would. Atleast at first it would probably be in the $30k range for no other reason then its uniqueness.Razi wrote:You're slow.
If a company came out with a 80mpg car, it'd sell.
Nobody likes paying so much for gas, that's why cars with good mpg are selling better than similar cars with worse mpg.
Good to hear you guys are among the few that use a vehicle for its intended purpose.Razi wrote: We've moved my sister into her dorm room, built a patio, hauled an engine, gone to the mountain, and more in our Pathfinder.
I still don't understand why you feel you know what kind of vehicle my family should drive better than myself, and that we aren't using it properly. Yes we own a gas guzzeling SUV, so what? We filled it with luggage yesterday afternoon and drove 4 hrs to Tennessee in it with 4 people and our 8 month old child. When we are at home, we both have short commutes and my wife works 3 days a week so she usually drives the commander most of the time since she usually stays home when she's not working. I chose to buy another SUV because it fit our needs and I've already put it to use multiple times since we bought it.PoorManQ45 wrote:
Just look at the thread that was in General Chat a week ago with a guy having to buy and SUV for his wife because they were having one kid...
Please provide some information behind that.TOMMY VERCETTI wrote:Diesel cars $uck!! End of story.
We used to do the same thing in a Grand Marquis...A33 wrote: I still don't understand why you feel you know what kind of vehicle my family should drive better than myself, and that we aren't using it properly. Yes we own a gas guzzeling SUV, so what? We filled it with luggage yesterday afternoon and drove 4 hrs to Tennessee in it with 4 people and our 8 month old child. When we are at home, we both have short commutes and my wife works 3 days a week so she usually drives the commander most of the time since she usually stays home when she's not working. I chose to buy another SUV because it fit our needs and I've already put it to use multiple times since we bought it.
So why not get an Early 90's mustang for less then your Altima with a 4.6 or even a 5.0 in it?IBCoupe wrote:Yes, but I'm not going to back to a weak-a** car because when I hit the gas, I need the car to be able to move.
Which brings us back to the "to get out of its own way" comment in the Aveo thread. Do we get it yet?
WTF do you need bigger speakers for? A faster computer? New clothes? Why do you need 3 meals a day? You don't NEED any of those things.PoorManQ45 wrote:What I really dislike is seeing so many large vehicles, mostly SUVs, in rush hour traffic that have only one person in them! WTF do they need that vehicle for!
Because this is America. See my prior post.PoorManQ45 wrote:So why not get an Early 90's mustang for less then your Altima with a 4.6 or even a 5.0 in it?
Ehhhh, in that situation it's all about the gearing.Looneybomber wrote:Heh, 85hp 2011 Aveo = 35mpg.
305hp 2010 mustang = 31mpg.
350hp 1997 C5 vette = 28mpg.
Inefficient? Quadrupling the HP decreases gas mileage by 20%
What we need are cars that aren't grossly underpowered, enabling them to just loaf along.
Yeah, but when you get the Aveo over 3k rpm... well not a damn thing happens.AZ89two4Tsx wrote:Ehhhh, in that situation it's all about the gearing.Looneybomber wrote:Heh, 85hp 2011 Aveo = 35mpg.
305hp 2010 mustang = 31mpg.
350hp 1997 C5 vette = 28mpg.
Inefficient? Quadrupling the HP decreases gas mileage by 20%
What we need are cars that aren't grossly underpowered, enabling them to just loaf along.
Once that ls1 gets over 3K rpm, there ain't no bragging about gas mileage there.
Thank you greg while i do drive a pickup and don't haul stuff everyday today i actually transported about 10k worth of tools in the bed of my pick-up.I've hauled countless motor's for friends,I've pulled my jeep(Won't happen with the rockwells unfortunately) through mountain passes to go four wheeling.I love my big displacement v6's and v8's.Do they get horrible gas mileage? Hell yes but the jeep was built almost completely out of recycled parts and continues to be built out of old military parts(now). Most of the parts on my dime(other than brakes,and tires) came outta a junkyard.I'm doing the world a favor by recycling parts that still have a lot of life left in them instead of going and dropping a ton of cash for a part that some meth head sweat shop laborer made.AZhitman wrote:PoorManQ45 wrote:What I really dislike is seeing so many large vehicles, mostly SUVs, in rush hour traffic that have only one person in them! WTF do they need that vehicle for!
Get over yourself. This is America. We drive what the F we want.
Why you gotta hate on the Fox bodies man?AZhitman wrote:Oh, and also because an early 90's Mustang is a colossal POS.
I'm not a Ford or Fox body fan, but I happen to like my neighbors 88 Fox body GT vert. I've been in it many times. It's a very clean unmolested stock garage queen. He regularly wins cruise night trophies. Of course it's got it's share of minor problems, some fit/finish issues and the brakes are awful (after all, it's an 80's Ford). But if you accept it for what it is (cheap sporty cruising convertible), and not a real sports car, it's really not bad.A33 wrote:Why you gotta hate on the Fox bodies man?AZhitman wrote:Oh, and also because an early 90's Mustang is a colossal POS.![]()
Now the 94-98 Mustangs were junk for sure, I wouldn't say that all the 87-93's were junk though. I had a 91 GT and a 91 LX 5.0 Coupe and loved both of them, you could run the hell out of them and still get 18mpg around town and 25mpg on the highway. I wouldn't mind having another 87-93 just for nostalgic reasons, but they're just not as visually appealing to me anymore since i've gotten older. It's hard to find one that doesn't look like a mullet mobile now and EVERYBODY drives a Mustang.


TDI Cup!Chaotic_Warlord wrote: What if someone developed a TDI powered vehicle that also had hybrid technology, oh wait I'm sure that it's already been done. America as a whole is rather snobbish when it comes to diesels, which is a shame since the rest of the planet have embraced the diesel engine and are making leaps and bounds with its fuel economy. As far as a Jetta TDI being boring, you should have tapped into your modding nature and spent some money on making performance improvements, then it wouldn't have been so boring. There are some TDI's out there that are just as fast and exciting to drive as some of their gas powered alternatives.
I can agree with that. I always advocate buying early to mid 90s high mileage vehicles. You can pick up the car for a couple bills.elwesso wrote:Honestly what makes the least amount of sense to me is buying a new car for the sole purpose of better fuel economy, especially if the car your getting rid of is fully paid for and is in decent running condition...
Good for you, you like diluting your oil with fuel...Oatmealman wrote: oh and i purposely let my truck idle for about 15 minutes on cold mornings,and i purposely run the jeep just a touch rich just to piss you off.
I am going to take a wild guess and say that you do very well in a corporate environment...AZhitman wrote: WTF do you need bigger speakers for? A faster computer? New clothes? Why do you need 3 meals a day? You don't NEED any of those things.
Get over yourself. This is America. We drive what the F we want.