Kamin wrote:alot of people just dont like the SCCA. and i dont mean autocross. i mean the entire organization. Im not a big fan of them because their organizational skills and people skills BLOW. id much rather run NASA.
and as for autocross vs track. im not a big fan of autocrossing for a couple reasons. seat time is WAY too minimal. i cant learn a course that fast. i use them for shakedowns on the car when i can but im not gonna bend over backwards to make an autocross. some people take it way too seriously. its driving around cones, in a parking lot.
I agree with you about autocrossing, but for someone with very limited funds, it's a fun alternative.
I have friends that do all three: NASA, SCCA, and HPDE. The HPDE is ideal for learning a track, and fine tuning setups. But they all much prefer SCCA over NASA. While NASA seems less restrictive and less expensive, (which makes it atttractive) they all noted the likelihood of mishaps is much higher at NASA. A few called NASA events at Summit Point a demolition derby. If you don't mind getting "charcater marks" on your car, NASA might be a better deal, but if you want to keep your car pristine, do HPDE
I've settled down to mostly HPDE as I enjoy tossing cars around a track and specs are meaningless, plus the price is right for me...free. Though I do have a buddy who's been nudging me to go in with him on a spec miata.I've been thinking about it.