Post by
sil80drifter »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/sil80drifter-u622.html
Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:05 pm
WD come on... is it really necessary to say that? Especially when:1) AEM = $1,600 (or more), and even though it's "plug and play" you still need to know what you're doing if you connect it to a boosted vehicle, because you’ll probably change a lot of the sensors anyway. At least for the SOHC, you'll need to know how to wire in Air Temp, boost, oil pressure, oil temp, egt, and a wideband (real one, not one wire), and that's like already half the wiring needed for the MS. The tuning is basically the same.
2) Yeah, we (devious) made huge leaps in ROM tuning. BUT, now, we (devious) are now using MS for (quote) 1.5 years on his 240. Not biki OR stock ECU. There is a reason for that. I trusted in devious to pick the best, most efficient way to manage our KA tuning needs 2 years ago, and that was with ROM tuning. Nowadays it seems to be MS. Both have been working well for him, and I wouldn't hesitate to pick either, but there is only so much you can do with ROM. A full standalone is quite obviously the better choice (you didn't use the stock ECU on your car did you?). If in a year devious says "xyz is what I'd use over MS," I'll have damn good reason to not hestitate and eventually follow his footsteps with that change. But for now, and for me, MS it is.
Plus, in the end, why the hell would you want to use a harness that’s easily 15+ years old anyway? Even the newest 240 is going to have 10 year old wires which I for sure would not trust farther than my own driveway. They've been through heat/frost cycles and spills and engine pulls/drop-ins, and my example may be best, are just plain s**t these days. Maybe the 97+ models can get away with using them, but I'd much rather make my own. Especially when you have pre-labeled harness kits out there which make the job so easy.
I know you've had great success with AEM EMS. No doubt if anyone has no time and doesn't care to learn his car inside-out while turboing it, and has the money, it's the best option.
But for around $500 (MS, including all sensors etc) vs. $1,600 (AEM), at least for me, there is not a doubt in my mind which system I'll go with.
And it's not like I would be half-assing it because it's cheaper. It's a proven system that's been working and has been known to perform equally well compared to much higher priced EMS systems. It's not a case of "cheap vs. good"
You know how something can be either cheap, not time consuming, and reliable, but you can always only pick two? Well,-The MS is cheap and reliable, but takes time.-The AEM is less time consuming and reliable, but not cheap.-The SAFC for example, (and please don’t throw yourself at this ill attempted comparison) is probably cheap and takes little time, but on its own it’s not very reliable (no timing control, no O2 output, doesn’t REALLY do all that well without other add-ons).
It is really up to the person which they choose.
You just sounded very critical when you expressed your view, and I felt that hey, you know, that didn't quite sit well with me.
I would also hope nobody will argue details on this (oh the AEM could be had for $1550, vs. the MS is really $600). The point is there is still always about a grand separating the two. The point is that one is more because it's easier, and the other less because it's more DIY. The point is that it's really up to the person and their situation. I guess most of dicussions in this forum state this over and over, but I feel that for this particular situation, this is very true as well.
sil80
Modified by sil80drifter at 9:48 AM 11/25/2006