But I dont think Ryan can see Russia from his housethemadscientist wrote:2008 was Obama/Biden vs Palin/McCain. Using that example, Ryan can get a book deal, FOX news jobs and get to speak at Republican rallies in adfinitum. That's job security!
But I dont think Ryan can see Russia from his housethemadscientist wrote:2008 was Obama/Biden vs Palin/McCain. Using that example, Ryan can get a book deal, FOX news jobs and get to speak at Republican rallies in adfinitum. That's job security!

I think what he is insinuating is that on many occasions, the act is consensual, and that the women only later claims to have been raped. Of course, I dont agree with that notion, I'm sure it happens, but I dont think its a large part of the overall case count.themadscientist wrote:Because it's what they believe. It seems off the wall to you and me, but to them it appears quite legitimate so they say it. I am glad they feel so righteous they confidently spew such crap in public. It lets you know what they are really about.
I will need a definitition of what constitutes a "legitimate rape." That's some alarming rhetoric. The masogonistic undercurrent of the GOP has always been distasteful to me.
brian seitzman wrote:It seems only fitting that the party who fielded a candidate who believes that the products of violent crimes against women should be legally mandated to be carried to term be forced to remain in the race until the end, regardless of his chances at success. You know, treat him metaphorically like he'd treat the children of rape and treat the GOP just like they'd treat it's victims.
I had a similar comment when Holli told me about this. I'd also like to see whatever "data" he used to generate his thought(less) process.themadscientist wrote:I will need a definitition of what constitutes a "legitimate rape."
